Tell us about you

Work Email required

Organization required

First Name required

Last Name required

Job Title required

Phone required (###) ###-####, or int ######...

City required

State/Province required

Tell us about your organization

error messages will go here...

Looks like we’re already familiar with you!

Please press next to continue with the survey.

Looks like we’re already familiar with you!

According to your account type you are not eligible to take surveys at this time. If this is a mistake, please contact KLAS.

If you are trying to access KLAS research data and reports, an email has been sent to   with a link to login.

If the email doesn't appear in your inbox, ask your IT department to add KLASresearch.com to your company spam filter's "whitelist", and check your email's spam folder.

Membership Commitment

In exchange for giving their feedback, healthcare providers can create an account to get access to industry reports, user commentary, and real-time ratings.

By submitting your account request, you are engaged in patient care as either an employee (or contractor) of your provider organization and that you confirm that you have reviewed and agree to abide by the Terms of Use for this website as updated periodically.

To learn more about how we process and protect your personal data, you may view our Privacy policy.

By submitting your account request, you confirm that you have reviewed and agree to abide by the Terms of Use for this website as updated periodically. To learn more about how we process and protect your personal data, you may view our Privacy policy.

By submitting your account request, you confirm that you have reviewed and agree to abide by the Terms of Use for this website as updated periodically.

To learn more about how we process and protect your personal data, you may view our Privacy policy.

 

To learn more about how we process and protect your personal data, you may view our Privacy policy.

 

To learn more about how we process and protect your personal data, you may view our Privacy policy.

Thank You! Your information was submitted successfully!

Next Steps - An email has been sent to . Please follow its instructions to verify your email, and login.

If the email doesn't appear in your inbox, try asking your IT department to add KLASresearch.com to your company spam filter's "whitelist", and checking your email's spam folder.

Thank You! Your information was submitted successfully!

Next Steps - A KLAS representative will contact you to discuss working with KLAS, typically within 24 to 48 hours.

If you have any further questions please contact info@klasresearch.com or 1-801-226-5120.

Surprise! Looks like we already have an account for you.

An email has been sent to blah@blah.com with a link to login.

If the email doesn't appear in your inbox, try asking your IT department to add KLASresearch.com to your company spam filter's "whitelist", and checking your email's spam folder.

The Results of Provider Votes on Vendor Connectivity - Cover

The Results of Provider Votes on Vendor Connectivity

The song is finished, and the TV screen flashes a message: It is time to vote! The selection of the next American Idol commences. For provider organizations, connecting to outside EMRs is a part of their everyday life, and the October Interoperability 2015 study gave them a chance to vote on the easiest and most difficult vendors to connect with when sharing outside patient data. 

Interoperability would be much more amusing if it were a talent contest with little impact on patient care. However, it is serious business to try and put the right information in clinicians' hands in the best format and at the most appropriate time to help diagnose and care for patients. Here's how the votes stack up by EMR vendor.

Answering the Question

More than 240 healthcare organizations gave their candid perspective by listing the EMR vendors that fit the criteria in response to the question: Which EMR vendors are easiest/most difficult to connect to when exchanging data outside of your organization? 

Participants could pick more than one EMR vendor in either scenario. Unlike the votes for the American Idol, the EMR vendor votes typically came with a lot of commentary where providers gave reasons for the selections. 

Epic Interfacing

One large university health system says that Epic-to-Epic interfacing is a piece of cake. To KLAS, that is no surprise since the connections between organizations using Epic's EMR were voted by far the easiest outside connections, but that is interesting mostly if you are an Epic client.

The Commitment of athenahealth 

Being able to connect to a foreign EMR is where the rubber meets the road. athenahealth is the overall provider favorite when looking at the ratio of easiest to most difficult votes, summarized well by this study participant: "What matters most right now is seeing vendors be committed to achieving interoperability. I would say that athenahealth is the most committed to it." In short, participants saw athenahealth as the company that says, "we can, if" rather than "we cannot, because."

Votes for Cerner

Cerner stood out as the other EMR vendor whose easiest to connect with votes significantly outnumbered their most difficult to connect with votes. As this provider explains, Cerner is relatively easy to work with when it comes to exchanging data because they can throw CCDs around pretty easily.

Stuck in the Middle

The rest of the EMR vendors were near the middle, where the ratio of positive and negative votes canceled each other out. Allscripts ended up slightly on the positive side of the ledger, while GE, Greenway, McKesson, MEDITECH, and NextGen Healthcare fell on the negative side. The exception was eClinicalWorks. Providers reported eClinicalWorks to be the most challenging vendor to exchange patient records with, as highlighted in this provider comment: "eClinicalWorks needs to make some real progress now. It feels like every connection we want to make is a custom connection."

The Winner

Not every participating organization could articulate specific EMR vendors that were easier or more difficult to work with; a majority, however, did have an opinion. When the 237 individual votes were counted, athenahealth was tagged the new American Idol--I mean, the easiest EMR vendor to share data with. Their example is worth emulating.


Next week we'll look at who the providers voted as the most effective EMR vendors to connect with.

Klas blogs

Latest tweets