Tell us about you

Work Email required

Organization required

First Name required

Last Name required

Job Title required

Phone required (###) ###-####, or int ######...

City required

State/Province required

Tell us about your organization

error messages will go here...

Looks like we’re already familiar with you!

Please press next to continue with the survey.

Looks like we’re already familiar with you!

According to your account type you are not eligible to take surveys at this time. If this is a mistake, please contact KLAS.

If you are trying to access KLAS research data and reports, an email has been sent to   with a link to login.

If the email doesn't appear in your inbox, ask your IT department to add KLASresearch.com to your company spam filter's "whitelist", and check your email's spam folder.

Membership Commitment

In exchange for giving their feedback, healthcare providers can create an account to get access to industry reports, user commentary, and real-time ratings.

By submitting your account request, you are engaged in patient care as either an employee (or contractor) of your provider organization and that you confirm that you have reviewed and agree to abide by the Terms of Use for this website as updated periodically.

To learn more about how we process and protect your personal data, you may view our Privacy policy.

By submitting your account request, you confirm that you have reviewed and agree to abide by the Terms of Use for this website as updated periodically. To learn more about how we process and protect your personal data, you may view our Privacy policy.

By submitting your account request, you confirm that you have reviewed and agree to abide by the Terms of Use for this website as updated periodically.

To learn more about how we process and protect your personal data, you may view our Privacy policy.

 

To learn more about how we process and protect your personal data, you may view our Privacy policy.

 

To learn more about how we process and protect your personal data, you may view our Privacy policy.

Thank You! Your information was submitted successfully!

Next Steps - An email has been sent to . Please follow its instructions to verify your email, and login.

If the email doesn't appear in your inbox, try asking your IT department to add KLASresearch.com to your company spam filter's "whitelist", and checking your email's spam folder.

Thank You! Your information was submitted successfully!

Next Steps - A KLAS representative will contact you to discuss working with KLAS, typically within 24 to 48 hours.

If you have any further questions please contact info@klasresearch.com or 1-801-226-5120.

Surprise! Looks like we already have an account for you.

An email has been sent to blah@blah.com with a link to login.

If the email doesn't appear in your inbox, try asking your IT department to add KLASresearch.com to your company spam filter's "whitelist", and checking your email's spam folder.

Premium Reports
Subject Expert

Contact KLAS

info@klasresearch.com

801.226.5120

KLAS - Contact KLAS
 Download Report Brief  Download Full Report    Zoom in charts

Preferences

   Bookmark

Related Series

 No Related Series

 End chart zoom
Epic HIE 2014
* A page refresh may be necessary to see the updated image

Epic HIE 2014
Everywhere, Elsewhere, or Nowhere Else?

Authored by: Mark Allphin May 8, 2014 | Read Time: 3  minutes

Current Time Inside Cache Tag Helper: 7/24/2021 1:42:28 PM and Model.reportId = 922

Wide-ranging praise from customers has made Epic a top-ranked software vendor in many KLAS reports. One area, however, is often a subject of criticism: Epic’s ability to share clinical data outside of an Epic ecosystem. Among many customers and competitors, Epic has a reputation as a closed system that is unsuitable for the collaboration and interoperability seen as vital for patients and providers alike. The goal of this report is to test that reputation among organizations said to be sharing clinical data between Epic and non-Epic systems today, examine how that is being accomplished, and highlight the strengths and weaknesses of Epic’s approach. Via 28 provider interviews, we look through the eyes of both Epic customers and the non-Epic organizations with which they share patient information.

Healthcare Providers,
Want to see more reports?

Not a Provider, contact us for pricing details.

HtmlReportContent Current Time Inside Cache Tag Helper: 7/24/2021 1:42:28 PM and Model.reportId= 922 and Model.HtmlReportContent_LastWriteTimeUtcInTicks=637498863799477241

how ready is epic interoperability for prime time industry use

WORTH KNOWING

EPIC-TO-NON-EPIC SHARING IS REAL:

KLAS validated twenty-seven unique instances of Epic customers sharing data with providers using other EMRs. Four out of five are doing so through an intermediary such as a non-Epic HIE or HISP solution. One out of five is achieving interoperability directly between EMRs. In most cases, information is delivered in a CCD format via industry-standard protocols for pushing (XDR) and pulling data (XCA, XDS.b).

EPIC STANDS FIRM:

While interoperability standards are supposed to facilitate sharing, most say significant effort is needed to bridge the gap between vendors’ unique implementations of those standards. HIE organizations and non-Epic providers say Epic is capable but inflexible and that other vendors must meet Epic where Epic stands. This report did not compare standards adherence, but for providers, variability among vendors underscores the value proposition of intermediary HIEs and HISPs.

EASIER FOR EPIC CUSTOMERS:

For Epic end users, sharing with other health systems is a stress-free experience. Epic handles the configuration, and then the already-familiar Care Everywhere tool suddenly has access to outside data. For non-Epic providers, interoperability is often a bumpier ride. When a vendor does not already support the standards Epic uses, providers often face extensive development and expensive interfaces. Once interoperability is in place, usability varies for non-Epic users: some enjoy easy access to Epic data inside their own EMRs, but others must use HIE portals outside their clinical workflow.

AFFORDABILITY NOT A PROBLEM:

While sharing with other Epic facilities incurs no extra charge, providers mentioned that it does result in new volume-based fees. Some objected to such charges on principle, but most cost-related feedback centered on interfaces—whose costs were seen as reasonable when coming from Epic but prohibitive when coming from other EMR vendors.

how do epic facilities share

STILL NO PLUG AND PLAY

Overall, Epic is ready for prime-time sharing with non-Epic systems, but this does not mean that interoperability is without bumps. Providers described some turbulence that is not always unique to Epic: Vendors do not all support the same standards in the same way, preserving a role for HIEs and HISPs. Vendor teamwork is needed, and providers may have to referee. Non-Epic vendors typically must be more flexible in closing gaps. While CCDs have a standard structure, providers fill them out differently based on their EMR's capability, quality of available data, and willingness to share. Even as designed, CCDs don't deliver the depth, breadth, and timeliness of data many desire. Some describe CCDs as no more than electronic faxes. CCDs often contain a mix of discrete and read-only data. The ability to import and reconcile data elements varies by EMR and provider source.

which vendors were connecting to epichow does your vendor performthe epic system is as mature as any other in the industry

 Download Report Brief  Download Full Report

This material is copyrighted. Any organization gaining unauthorized access to this report will be liable to compensate KLAS for the full retail price. Please see the KLAS DATA USE POLICY for information regarding use of this report. © 2021 KLAS Research, LLC. All Rights Reserved. NOTE: Performance scores may change significantly when including newly interviewed provider organizations, especially when added to a smaller sample size like in emerging markets with a small number of live clients. The findings presented are not meant to be conclusive data for an entire client base.