Tell us about your organization
Tell us about you
Work Email required
Organization required
First Name required
Last Name required
Job Title required
Phone required (###) ###-####, or int ######...
City required
State/Province required
Business Information
Looks like we’re already familiar with you!
Please press next to continue with the survey.
Looks like we’re already familiar with you!
According to your account type you are not eligible to take surveys at this time. If this is a mistake, please contact KLAS.
If you are trying to access KLAS research data and reports, an email has been sent to with a link to login.
If the email doesn't appear in your inbox, ask your IT department to add KLASresearch.com to your company spam filter's "whitelist", and check your email's spam folder.
Membership Commitment
In exchange for giving their feedback, healthcare providers can create an account to get access to industry reports, user commentary, and real-time ratings.
By submitting your account request, you are engaged in patient care as either an employee (or contractor) of your provider organization and that you confirm that you have reviewed and agree to abide by the Terms of Use for this website as updated periodically.
To learn more about how we process and protect your personal data, you may view our Privacy policy.
By submitting your account request, you confirm that you have reviewed and agree to abide by the Terms of Use for this website as updated periodically. To learn more about how we process and protect your personal data, you may view our Privacy policy.
By submitting your account request, you confirm that you have reviewed and agree to abide by the Terms of Use for this website as updated periodically.
To learn more about how we process and protect your personal data, you may view our Privacy policy.
To learn more about how we process and protect your personal data, you may view our Privacy policy.
To learn more about how we process and protect your personal data, you may view our Privacy policy.
Thank You! Your information was submitted successfully!
Next Steps - An email has been sent to . Please follow its instructions to verify your email, and login.
If the email doesn't appear in your inbox, try asking your IT department to add KLASresearch.com to your company spam filter's "whitelist", and checking your email's spam folder.
Thank You! Your information was submitted successfully!
Next Steps - A KLAS representative will contact you to discuss working with KLAS, typically within 24 to 48 hours.
If you have any further questions please contact info@klasresearch.com or 1-800-920-4109.
Surprise! Looks like we already have an account for you.
An email has been sent to blah@blah.com with a link to login.
If the email doesn't appear in your inbox, try asking your IT department to add KLASresearch.com to your company spam filter's "whitelist", and checking your email's spam folder.
Oops! Looks like you don't currently have access.
Your current membership doesn't include access to this page, but don’t worry we can fix that.
To obtain access to this data,
contact Contact KLAS
at
KLAS Contact
Global EMR Purchasing Decisions 2014
Usability and Integration Driving Mindshare
Current Time Inside Cache Tag Helper: 1/26/2021 11:38:47 AM and Model.reportId = 956
Healthcare systems outside the United States continue to make decisions on EMR technology. Which vendors are being selected and why? What criteria are most important? And what scares providers most about implementing such technology? KLAS spoke with potential buyers around the globe to find out.Healthcare Providers,
Want to see more reports?
Not a Provider, contact us for pricing details.
HtmlReportContent Current Time Inside Cache Tag Helper: 1/26/2021 11:38:47 AM and Model.reportId= 956 and Model.HtmlReportContent_LastWriteTimeUtcInTicks=637406508633269356
WORTH KNOWING:
SIX VENDORS HAVE GLOBAL MINDSHARE—CERNER AND EPIC LEAD.
Though Cerner† and Epic do not lead in global EMR market share,large and small provider organizations consider them far more often than they do any other vendors. Providers are most likely to lean toward Cerner as a probable choice, but Epic has significantly increased in mindshare despite a small global footprint—providers feel compelled to consider Epic based on their reputation in the market. The next most seriously considered vendors are MEDITECH, InterSystems, Allscripts, and Siemens. Reported market share for Siemens, InterSystems, and Agfa is not reflected in current mindshare.
FUNCTIONALITY VS. COSTCONUNDRUM.
Nearly 75% of providers listed usability as a top EMR criterion. Providers feel Epic is the clear leader in clinical usability and mention Cerner’s population health solutions. Perceived lower-cost solutions from Allscripts, CSC, InterSystems,and MEDITECH face an uphill battle; as providers weight their selections heavily toward usability and technology,higher-cost solutions Cerner and Epic benefit. Providers noted that no vendor clearly stands out in terms of mobility.
REGIONAL SOLUTIONS LOSINGGROUND IN THE UK.
Epic, InterSystems, Allscripts, and Cerner have seen the largest gains in UK mindshare since 2012. Alternatively,local products from System C and CSC have seen relatively little growth in mindshare as global competitors have increased exposure thanks to recent installs/contracts in the country. Cerner leads in overall mindshare in the UK, having capitalized on their increased performance and existing customer base.
† Data for this report was collected prior to Cerner’s announcement of their decision to acquire Siemens’ healthcare division.
This material is copyrighted. Any organization gaining unauthorized access to this report will be liable to compensate KLAS for the full retail price. Please see the KLAS DATA USE POLICY for information regarding use of this report. © 2021 KLAS Research, LLC. All Rights Reserved. NOTE: Performance scores may change significantly when including newly interviewed provider organizations, especially when added to a smaller sample size like in emerging markets with a small number of live clients. The findings presented are not meant to be conclusive data for an entire client base.