Premium Reports
Population Health Management 2018

Population Health Management 2018
Decision Insights Report

Authored by: Doug Tolley and Sam Eaquinto June 22, 2018 | Read Time: 6  minutes

When purchasing a population health management (PHM) solution, provider organizations can choose from three general types of vendors, each of which comes with a potential disadvantage. Organizations can (1) choose from the established vendors, who tend to have lower overall customer satisfaction; (2) start with their EMR vendor, though EMR solutions can be immature and lack the required functionality depth; or (3) select an upstart company—though their potential can be alluring, these vendors lack a proven track record. In a rapidly evolving market where few vendors deliver as much as they promise, what are the best options available? Which PHM vendors have high market consideration, above-average customer retention, or high customer satisfaction? And do any vendors have all three? 

The A-List: Enli and Epic

Who Has Market Energy?

Market Satisfaction Leader

What Drives New Energy?

Is Population Health a Replacement Market?

Promises Kept?

Does Facility Size Influence Vendor Selection?

Who Should CIOs Keep an Eye On?

 Download Full Report

This material is copyrighted. Any organization gaining unauthorized access to this report will be liable to compensate KLAS for the full retail price. Please see the KLAS DATA USE POLICY for information regarding use of this report. © 2020 KLAS Research, LLC. All Rights Reserved. NOTE: Performance scores may change significantly when including newly interviewed provider organizations, especially when added to a smaller sample size like in emerging markets with a small number of live clients. The findings presented are not meant to be conclusive data for an entire client base.