Tell us about you

Work Email required

Organization required

First Name required

Last Name required

Job Title required

Phone required (###) ###-####, or int ######...

City required

State/Province required

Tell us about your organization

error messages will go here...

Looks like we’re already familiar with you!

Please press next to continue with the survey.

Looks like we’re already familiar with you!

According to your account type you are not eligible to take surveys at this time. If this is a mistake, please contact KLAS.

If you are trying to access KLAS research data and reports, an email has been sent to   with a link to login.

If the email doesn't appear in your inbox, ask your IT department to add KLASresearch.com to your company spam filter's "whitelist", and check your email's spam folder.

Membership Commitment

In exchange for giving their feedback, healthcare providers can create an account to get access to industry reports, user commentary, and real-time ratings.

By submitting your account request, you are engaged in patient care as either an employee (or contractor) of your provider organization and that you confirm that you have reviewed and agree to abide by the Terms of Use for this website as updated periodically.

To learn more about how we process and protect your personal data, you may view our Privacy policy.

By submitting your account request, you confirm that you have reviewed and agree to abide by the Terms of Use for this website as updated periodically. To learn more about how we process and protect your personal data, you may view our Privacy policy.

By submitting your account request, you confirm that you have reviewed and agree to abide by the Terms of Use for this website as updated periodically.

To learn more about how we process and protect your personal data, you may view our Privacy policy.

 

To learn more about how we process and protect your personal data, you may view our Privacy policy.

 

To learn more about how we process and protect your personal data, you may view our Privacy policy.

Thank You! Your information was submitted successfully!

Next Steps - An email has been sent to . Please follow its instructions to verify your email, and login.

If the email doesn't appear in your inbox, try asking your IT department to add KLASresearch.com to your company spam filter's "whitelist", and checking your email's spam folder.

Thank You! Your information was submitted successfully!

Next Steps - A KLAS representative will contact you to discuss working with KLAS, typically within 24 to 48 hours.

If you have any further questions please contact info@klasresearch.com or 1-801-226-5120.

Surprise! Looks like we already have an account for you.

An email has been sent to blah@blah.com with a link to login.

If the email doesn't appear in your inbox, try asking your IT department to add KLASresearch.com to your company spam filter's "whitelist", and checking your email's spam folder.

Premium Reports
Subject Expert

Contact KLAS

info@klasresearch.com

801.226.5120

KLAS - Contact KLAS
 Download Report Brief  Download Full Report    Zoom in charts

Preferences

   Bookmark

Related Series

Teleradiology Services 2011
|
2011
Teleradiology Study 2010
|
2010

 End chart zoom
Teleradiology 2013
* A page refresh may be necessary to see the updated image

Teleradiology 2013
Serving the Emergency Department

November 5, 2013 | Read Time: 4  minutes

Current Time Inside Cache Tag Helper: 7/29/2021 3:10:20 PM and Model.reportId = 848

As government regulations expand and reimbursements shrink, some radiology groups are considering bringing night and weekend reads back in-house, and a few have already made the leap. Hospitals looking to save some money are contracting directly with teleradiology firms. Providers are looking for teleradiology firms to demonstrate their value and offer excellent service. Which vendors can take care of ED needs best? Who has the best report quality and is most consistent with turnaround times? KLAS spoke with 213 providers to find out.

Healthcare Providers,
Want to see more reports?

Not a Provider, contact us for pricing details.

HtmlReportContent Current Time Inside Cache Tag Helper: 7/29/2021 3:10:20 PM and Model.reportId= 848 and Model.HtmlReportContent_LastWriteTimeUtcInTicks=637497874715806787

TELERADIOLOGY 2013
Serving the Emergency Department


Report Author: Brady Heiner


As government regulations expand and reimbursements shrink, some radiology groups are considering bringing night and weekend reads back in-house, and a few have already made the leap. Hospitals looking to save some money are contracting directly with teleradiology firms. Providers are looking for teleradiology firms to demonstrate their value and offer excellent service. Which vendors can take care of ED needs best? Who has the best report quality and is most consistent with turnaround times? KLAS spoke with 213 providers to find out.

overall performance


WORTH KNOWING


STATRAD, RAYS, AND TRS IN A TIGHT RACE FOR BEST REPORT QUALITY These top performers show stellar report quality is tied to overall satisfaction and all three have improved since the 2011 report. StatRad clients said that reports are very consistent no matter which physician reads them. TRS reports are also described as consistent. Rays customers said there were few discrepancies and that reports are thorough but concise. On the other end of the spectrum, regional players Alta Vista and RadNet have room to improve their report quality. Alta Vista customers said they find misreads periodically, and RadNet customers said that reports are sometimes not detailed enough. Overall, great reports strike a balance between detail, accuracy, and brevity.


ALTA VISTA, RADNET, & ONRAD NEED TO WORK BETTER WITH THE ED To stay competitive in teleradiology, vendors have to be able to meet the needs of the ED. Providers noted two major issues that are negatively affecting ED satisfaction. One is turnaround times for stat reads, and the other is communication and setting expectations with the ED. Generally, the vendors who keep the ED in the loop, specifically StatRad, vRad, and Rays, are able to maintain higher satisfaction. Alta Vista, ONRAD and RadNet struggle the most in meeting ED needs.


HITTING EXPECTATIONS WITH TURNAROUND TIMES IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN SPEED ONRAD has great turnaround times, but this is not reflected in their overall performance score because they do not set proper expectations. On the other hand, vRad and TRS customers are very pleased with turnaround times that are on average slower than ONRAD’s. TRS and vRad are hitting expectations with their customers, and therefore those customers are overall more satisfied even though their preliminary reports take a little longer.


REGIONAL SPECIALIZATION DOES NOT MEAN REGIONAL SUCCESS All three regional vendors, Alta Vista, ONRAD, and RadNet, perform at or near the bottom in their respective geographies despite their focus in those regions.


average turnaround time for preliminary reads


teleradiology vendor performance rating


BOTTOM LINE ON VENDORS


RANKED—FULLY RATED
RAYS—Highest performer in a high-performing market. Excellent communication, and service is proactive. Clients impressed by report quality. Preliminary read turnaround times not quickest but meeting expectations. Performs well with the ED, who is happy with stat read turnaround times. Clients concentrated in the Southeast. Full-service firm, offering on-site radiologists. Hospitals own 37% of the contracts with Rays.


STATRAD—One-hundred percent of preliminary reads done under 30 minutes. Maintains excellent report quality even with quick turnaround. Highest ED satisfaction. Great value for providers. Providers appreciate communication and involvement from StatRad staff and are most likely to recommend.


TRS—Radiology groups see the offshore company as less of a competitive threat to their hospital accounts. Maintains turnaround times under 30 minutes for 56% of clients and sets expectations well. Providers get excellent value. No major problems with offshore operations—in fact one of the highest scores for access to reading physicians.

  

VRAD—Overall performance improved over past three years. Not offering the quickest turnaround times, but provider expectations are met. Report quality has improved; communication more proactive and better interaction with the ED. Nearly 40% of contracts are with hospitals, which is one of the highest in the study and a red flag for some radiology groups.


REGIONAL AND NON-RANKED

ALTA VISTA—Inconsistent preliminary read turnaround times. Best with access to reading physicians, and good ED satisfaction due to open lines of communication. Some quality issues with misreads. Lowest rating for handling provider’s volume flexibility. Most customers are in the central U.S.; Alta Vista stands to lose some customers.

  

ONRAD—Consistently quick turnaround times for preliminary and stat reads—almost all under 30 minutes. Many still receiving faxed reports, though setup is adequate for most. Ratings for access to reading physician and ED satisfaction lower than those of ranked vendors. Small hiccups with executive involvement and communication. Largest proportion of hospital-owned contracts (50%). Clients mostly in western U.S.

  

RADNET—Lowest overall performance in the study. A few customers indicated moving to a new vendor. RadNet not creating value for clients—several feel nickel-and-dimed. Turnaround times not as quick as other vendors’, and the technology earns the lowest rating by far. Physician access is not meeting needs because it is typically through an intermediary. Clients are concentrated in the northeastern U.S.


RADISPHERE—Found primarily in ambulatory setting. Primarily specializing in subspecialty reads; doing more final reads than other vendors. Final read quality is good, but turnaround time for preliminary reads is much longer than average—only 36% under 30 minutes. Access to reading physician and communication are lacking.


contract ownership and success rate


klas logo


This material is copyrighted. Any organization gaining unauthorized access to this report will be liable to compensate KLAS for the full retail price. Please see the KLAS DATA USE POLICY for information regarding use of this report. © 2014 KLAS Enterprises, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

 

 

 

 Download Report Brief  Download Full Report

This material is copyrighted. Any organization gaining unauthorized access to this report will be liable to compensate KLAS for the full retail price. Please see the KLAS DATA USE POLICY for information regarding use of this report. © 2021 KLAS Research, LLC. All Rights Reserved. NOTE: Performance scores may change significantly when including newly interviewed provider organizations, especially when added to a smaller sample size like in emerging markets with a small number of live clients. The findings presented are not meant to be conclusive data for an entire client base.