The Arch
Collaborative

The Arch Collaborative

Through collaboration, measurement, and member cooperation, organizations can unlock the potential of EMR solutions to revolutionize healthcare efficiency and care-quality improvements.

The Arch Collaborative: Bridging the productivity paradox in healthcare

What is the Arch Collaborative?

  • Perhaps the following questions sound familiar:
  • “How well has our organization done at deploying our EMR?”
  • “Is clinician satisfaction at our organization above or below average? Is it improving?”
  • “Is our EMR-governance model working?”
  • “Is our EMR training effective, or is our organization wasting money?”
  • “What is the connection between physician burnout and our EMR?”
  • “Are we utilizing all of our EMR's capabilities effectively?”

Most provider organizations don’t know the answers to these questions today. Learning these answers will require industry-benchmarked measurements of user sentiment, EMR efficiency, and potential physician burnout across organizations.

When organizations learn the answers to these questions, the highest-achieving organizations will be able to share their hard-learned keys to success, thereby helping providers everywhere.

Elements of the Arch Collaborative

See examples of the base questionnaire and deliverables

View Examples

Upcoming Webinar

Topic: Summary of Best Practices Report Webinar

Tuesday, December 12, 2017 10:30 am – 11:30 am MST
View all Webinars

2018 Arch Collaborative Learning Summit

Attend the Summit and make a difference

Reserve Seats

Join the Arch Collaborative

Become part of the solution

Get Started

Elements of the Arch Collaborative

KLAS firmly believes that it is difficult to improve processes without measurement. In response to this belief, KLAS encourages all provider organizations to participate in the Arch Collaborative. Each organization may use KLAS’ EMR-measurement questionnaire and receive benchmarking results free of charge after participating for the first time. Repeated usage of the questionnaire and KLAS-facilitated collaboration with other organizations requires a provider organization to be an Executive Partner with KLAS. All participating organizations and Executive Partners are encouraged to use information collected from the Collaborative to align EMR stakeholders with appropriate governance and target the highest-impact options for EMR improvement in provider organizations and the industry.

Measurement

Collaborative participants use the same* base user questionnaire to find the answers to key questions about EMR usability. The participating organization sends this survey is sent to all EMR users in the organization.

Each organization also participates in an executive interview with KLAS that is used to benchmark the organization against peer organizations.

*All participating organizations can make deletions and vernacular changes to the survey, and Executive Partners can add custom questions.

Benchmarking

KLAS hosts the survey and benchmarks an organization’s results against those of the other participating organizations. All participating organizations receive these results in the form of benchmark charts. Executive Partners receive these results in the form of benchmark charts and a personalized benchmark report delivered to the organization 45–60 days after the survey’s cutoff date.

Collaboration

The Arch Collaborative will facilitate collaboration between Executive Partners, their vendors, and other Collaborative participants through Best Practice reports, webinars, participation at a yearly conference, and upon request by Executive Partners. If the provider organization requests, EMR vendors will also be engaged and provided with insights on how to deliver EMR environments.

You can improve EMR

Can I Improve EMR
Satisfaction and Efficiency?

With over 16,000 evaluations collected to date across dozens of organizations, caregiver EMR users are providing clear feedback that they will be satisfied with their EMRs when they meet the providers’ specific caregiving-workflow needs. This research is busting the myth that EMR dissatisfaction is largely a result of factors outside the healthcare organization’s control (user age, organization size, physician burnout, etc.).

The Collaborative research is aimed at continual learning, but some factors with the potential to increase user efficiency and satisfaction have already been clearly identified. Some of these factors include:

  • Effective, Ongoing Training: For many physicians, ”training” means getting locked into a room for a couple of hours to learn a few things that might be helpful. However, the most effective organizations are finding ways to engage physicians early and often so that they learn from each other and trained leaders. The link between training and success with an EMR is dramatic.

  • EMR Personalization: The majority of EMR users accept and use the configurations that are originally handed to them. Users who take the time to personalize the EMR to their needs are three to five times more likely to be highly satisfied with the EMR.

  • EMR Governance/Physician Engagement: Effective organizations have found ways to quickly incorporate end-user feedback into the EMR-optimization process. Less effective organizations struggle to get anyone to show up to governance meetings.

Make a Difference

Join the KLAS Community to stand with other healthcare professionals by driving change within the industry.

Join Us