Premium Reports
Contact KLAS
 Download Report Brief  Download Full Report    Zoom in charts

Preferences

   Bookmark

Related Series

PACS 2022
|
2022
PACS 2020
|
2020
PACS 2018
|
2018
PACS 2017
|
2017
PACS 2015
|
2015
PACS Technology 2013
|
2013
Community and Ambulatory PACS 2012
|
2012
PACS 2011
|
2011
Ambulatory RIS/PACS
|
2011
A Read on PACS
|
2010
The New PACS Market
|
2009
Ambulatory PACS 2008
|
2008
Community Hospital PACS 2008
|
2008
Ambulatory PACS 2007
|
2007
Community Hospital PACS 2007
|
2007
Ambulatory PACS 2006
|
2006
Community PACS 2006
|
2006
Acute Care PACS 2006
|
2006
PACS - Ambulatory/Imaging Center Report 2005
|
2005
PACS - Community Hospital Report 2005
|
2005
PACS - Acute Care Large Study 2005
|
2005

Related Segments

 End chart zoom
PACS - Acute Care 2008 PACS - Acute Care 2008
* A page refresh may be necessary to see the updated image

PACS - Acute Care 2008

 
April 1, 2008

Healthcare providers report that implementing a PACS solution streamlines efficiency, improves quality patient care, and increases cost savings. With more than 70 PACS solutions available to CIOs and imaging department directors, vendor selection is not much easier today than it was when KLAS first began monitoring PACS vendor performance in 2001.

Interest in the PACS market continues to grow, and data regarding PACS solutions is some of the most accessed in the KLAS database. In this year’s report, KLAS collected data from more than 600 respondents employed at large hospitals with 200 beds or more in order to report on current vendor performance and trends in the PACS market.

Key findings include:

  • 7% of respondents mentioned that they are considering replacing their current PACS vendor. Which vendors are they replacing?
  • 51% of respondents believe that their PACS has all needed functionality. Which PACS products provide healthcare organizations with the administrative tools, management reports, interfaces and functionality to meet their needs?
  • Half of the vendors that qualified for ranking scored above the market segment average (80.5 out of 100). The other half scored below the average. Which vendors are healthcare providers rating well? What makes them successful?

Products qualifying for ranking in the study were:

  • Agfa IMPAX
  • AMICAS Vision Series
  • Carestream (Kodak) DirectView
  • Cerner Millennium ProVision
  • DR Systems Unity
  • Emageon Enterprise Visual
  • FUJIFILM Synapse
  • GE Centricity IW (Dynamic Imaging)
  • GE Centricity PACS
  • McKesson Horizon Medical Imaging
  • Philips iSite
  • Siemens syngo Imaging

Early findings were also included for Aspyra AccessNET, Intelerad IntelePACS, Merge Healthcare Fusion, NoveRad NovaPACS, ScImage PicomEnterprise Radiology, Sectra PACS, and Siemens SIENET.

author - Robert Ellis
Project Manager
Robert Ellis
 Download Report Brief  Download Full Report

This material is copyrighted. Any organization gaining unauthorized access to this report will be liable to compensate KLAS for the full retail price. Please see the KLAS DATA USE POLICY for information regarding use of this report. © 2024 KLAS Research, LLC. All Rights Reserved. NOTE: Performance scores may change significantly when including newly interviewed provider organizations, especially when added to a smaller sample size like in emerging markets with a small number of live clients. The findings presented are not meant to be conclusive data for an entire client base.

Related Segments

​