Aerial for Payer Care Management Commentary
Filtered view: All
Subject Expert
Mac Boyter
Senior Vice President of Insights
If you don't have a login, getting started is easy.
User Commentary
We stopped using Aerial because it wasn’t going to fully be able to meet the CMS requirements for...
We struggled with Aerial to get turnaround times updated based on CMS regulations. My understanding...
Medecision wasn’t developing their product to fully support the CMS requirements. Their solution was...
The support we’ve gotten from Medecision has been very good so far.
I’d like Medecision to keep the innovation up with the new platform, and then hopefully support is...
We have an internally developed stratification engine that we integrate with Medecision for care...
We are not going to move to Medecision’s new platform; we decided to just stick with Aerial.
We are excited about Medecision’s AI-based capabilities.
When we need support for Aerial, Medecision’s support people don’t seem to understand their own...
Medecision wanted us to upgrade to some newer solution because we're on a legacy platform, but we...
Medecision has done nothing to positively impact our program in recent years. The integration for...
The care management solutions that we've been looking at cost less than Aerial, so Medecision’s...
Aerial has been a stable system actually for a while.
Medecision has been incredible. One of the things that really impressed me was their Aerial...
Medecision is very good at resolving issues. If they cannot resolve something, we get an answer back...
I really like the functionality across modules in the platform, especially in the case management...
There are some areas where Medecision could improve The Medecision Platform. Their provider feeds,...
Working with Medecision has been great. They have been very responsive. If they cannot do something,...
I do not have the ability right now with the platform to run my own reports because Medecision is...
Commentary Summary
Comment Type Breakout