Cardiology
Products that provide digital image management for cardiovascular modalities.

Recent Insights
Data in this report comes from two sources: KLAS Decision Insights data (information on which vendors are being replaced, considered, and purchased and what factors drive these decisions) and KLAS performance data (quantitative ratings on metrics like functionality, ease of use, integration, etc.). For more information, see the About This Report section.
Key Findings:
- Philips, IBM Watson Health & Fujifilm Most Often Considered
- Agfa HealthCare, GE Healthcare & Change Healthcare See Less Momentum
- When Considered, Epic & ScImage Often Selected (Usually in Combination with Other Vendors)
- Integration, Functionality & Cardiologist Preference Drive Selections & Replacements
- Philips, Epic, IBM Watson Health Selected Most by Large Organizations
- Vendor Summaries
- Other Vendors in the Cardiology Space
if you don't have a login, getting started is easy.
Performance Data
Overall Score by Product
Products Appearing in Decisions
Overall Score by Question Topic
Provider Facility Size by Product
Provider Facility Type by Product
Reducing Filters
Unlike sizing filters, reducing filters DO NOT recalculate scores based on the evaluations that meet these requirements. They narrow the list of solutions to show the vendors and solutions that can meet a specific need.
This data is based on interviews with a sample of the firms' recent clients. As a result, it is not necessarily comprehensive of all work a firm may do in this segment.
We require a minimum of 2 confirmations of a service performed in the last 3 years for a solution to qualify.