VIVACE MV PACS (Global) (Mostly Brazil) Commentary
Filtered view: (Latin America)
Subject Expert
Monique Rasband
VP of Engagement
If you don't have a login, getting started is easy.
User Commentary
VIVACE MV PACS is still new, and we have direct access to the consultant who trained us, and that...
With VIVACE MV PACS, everything is now connected. It receives studies from x-ray, CT, endoscopy,...
I have been looking for other recent solutions because the contracts for both VIVACE MV PACS and our...
MV is transparent with charges, but they are just unsuitable for us. At this moment, we are...
MV's biggest opportunity to improve the product is to add AI features to support diagnosis. MV could...
MV's greatest strengths are the technology and the flexibility of the solution architecture. I like...
The product is widely used in other healthcare facilities, and it works properly.
I would like to see the vendor broaden the tool's usability across other healthcare institutions.
The vendor's biggest opportunities to improve the product are with support, implementation,...
When we request customizations, even if those are not on the vendor’s road map, they treat the...
We often talk about structural updates, like upgrading versions to improve reporting and...
The system is very intuitive. The doctors like that. It helps a lot with the implementation. I lose...
With the latest version, the vendor avoids charging for every little thing. They did charge us...
Because the doctors today already have their own vendor workstations, there aren’t bottlenecks at...
Our physicians have asked to switch PACS a few times, but we have managed to convince them to stay....
We get an ROI from VIVACE MV PACS, but the system's cost is quite high. I have seen MV's AI work. We...
It usually takes a few months for us to do an update to VIVACE MV PACS, but historically, it was...
These days, we don’t do anything without a business case. We analyze returns on investments and...
Commentary Summary
Comment Type Breakout