2021 Best In KLAS Digital Pathology (Non-US) Europe

Use of digital pathology for primary diagnosis † has recently seen a rapid increase in both interest and adoption, thanks to benefits like improved efficiency and remote reading/telepathology capabilities (see KLAS’ 2019 report ). The COVID-19 pandemic has spurred even greater consideration of remote-reading options, and some organizations are looking to digital pathology to mitigate anticipated pathologist shortages in the future. Overall, Europe has seen the greatest adoption of digital pathology. For this report, KLAS interviewed pathology groups across 15 European countries who are live with digital pathology for primary diagnosis. The following pages share performance insights on Philips, Sectra, and Tribun Health—the market leaders in considerations and live customers for digital pathology image management systems (IMS).

The Best in KLAS report recognizes software and services companies who excel in helping healthcare professionals improve patient care. All rankings are a direct result of the feedback of thousands of providers over the last year. A Best in KLAS award signifies to the healthcare IT industry the commitment and partnership that the top vendors should provide. Read the report to see the top-rated medical software and services for 2021. Watch sessions from our first-ever virtual Best In KLAS Award Show to hear from the winning vendors in each segment. View Awards Show Recordings

Performance

A Digital Pathology Addendum 2020

15 October 20 | Eder Lagemann and Jonathan Christensen

In 2019, KLAS published our first look at digital pathology solutions. A number of leading organizations using digital pathology solutions for primary diagnosis were interviewed, with particular focus on reference sites from vendors in North America and Europe. The study highlighted some of the most prevalent vendors in the market, such as Philips and Sectra. KLAS also validated organizations using or considering other vendors, including TRIBVN Healthcare, for imaging management (i.e., PACS/workflow). TRIBVN Healthcare came to KLAS’ attention too late for them to be fully measured in the 2019 report. However, the vendor has since shared a customer list with KLAS, and this addendum examines the experience of those customers. The framework below—from the 2019 report—details the technologies that healthcare organizations need to get started with digital pathology. For more on the performance of other digital pathology vendors, the best practices recommended by successful organizations, and potential benefits of the technology, see the full report .

Company/solution	Overall score	Total evaluations	Trend (2020-2021)	Culture	Loyalty	Operations	Product	Relationship	Value	Censinet assessment

Sectra Digital Pathology Solution (Non-US)	91.3	n=7	N/A	A-	A+	B+	A-	A-	A

TRIBUN Health TRIBVN Healthcare CaloPix (Non-US)	90.9	n=6	N/A	A	A	A-	B+	A	A
	50.0	100.0		*Limited Data

Company/solution	Trend (2020-2021)	Culture	Loyalty	Operations	Product	Relationship	Value

Sectra Digital Pathology Solution (Non-US) 91.3 n=7 COMMENTS	N/A	A-	A+	B+	A-	A-	A
TRIBUN Health TRIBVN Healthcare CaloPix (Non-US) 90.9 n=6 COMMENTS	N/A	A	A	A-	B+	A	A

Digital Pathology (Non-US) Europe

Past Digital Pathology (Non-US) Europe Awards

Contact KLAS

Tell us about your organization

How can we help you?