Premium Reports
Contact KLAS
 Download Report Brief  Download Full Report    Zoom in charts

Preferences

   Bookmark

Related Series

Cardiology 2022
|
2022
Cardiology 2020
|
2021
Cardiovascular Structured Reporting 2018
|
2018
Cardiology 2017
|
2017
Cardiology 2016
|
2016
Cardiology 2015
|
2015
CVIS 2014
|
2014
Cardiology 2013
|
2013
Cardiology 2012
|
2012
Cardiology 2011
|
2011
Cardiology IT
|
2010
In Search of a CVIS
|
2009
Cardiology Reporting 2007
|
2007
Cardiology Reporting and Hemodynamics Report 2005
|
2005

Related Segments

 End chart zoom
Cardiology 2025 Cardiology 2025
* A page refresh may be necessary to see the updated image

Cardiology 2025
In a Complex Market, Support & Relationships Are Key to Customer Satisfaction

author - Monique Rasband
Author
Monique Rasband
author - Ciera Walker
Author
Ciera Walker
 
February 12, 2025 | Read Time: 8  minutes

Because cardiology is a highly complex environment, the effective use of cardiology HIT solutions requires healthcare organizations to proactively manage structured reporting, procedure and equipment changes, and image archiving. Currently, organizations are considering what is next for their cardiology imaging solution, specifically with the cloud and AI, and cardiology is increasingly being considered as part of enterprise imaging. Still, healthcare organizations commonly feel their solution’s development is stale and that structured reporting is challenging. In this complex space, vendor relationships have become a marked differentiator, as organizations highly value support and training from engaged, knowledgeable contacts who can help guide users through the solution’s complexity. To help organizations find which vendors may best meet their needs as well as what elements are most necessary for success, this report examines customer satisfaction with cardiology vendors (especially around their support and training), customers’ future plans with their cardiology solutions, and the adoption of structured reporting. Additionally, an update on customer satisfaction with hemodynamics solutions is provided.

Note: Respondent organizations may be using multiple cardiology solutions and/or a hemodynamics solution; not all respondents could share feedback on each module or on their hemodynamics solution.

to see the full dataset.

If you don't have a login, getting started is easy.

Provider Organizations
Fill out our registration form to verify your organization.
HIT Companies
Contact a KLAS representative for plans and pricing.

Key Findings:

  1. Merge Customers Benefit from Knowledgeable, Engaged Contacts; Fujifilm Customers Moving to Long-Awaited Version That Unites Radiology & Cardiology
  2. Siemens & GE Customers Report Training Struggles & Lower Structured Reporting Adoption; Siemens Provides Stable Vendor Relationships, GE Noted for Support Improvements Through Buggy Updates
  3. Some Philips Respondents Are Considering Leaving Due to Insufficient Support
  4. Epic Customers Appreciate Strong Relationships, Acknowledge Lengthy Build Times for Structured Reporting
author - Carlisa Cramer
Writer
Carlisa Cramer
author - Nikki Christensen
Designer
Nikki Christensen
author - Sydney Toomer
Project Manager
Sydney Toomer
 Download Report Brief  Download Full Report

This material is copyrighted. Any organization gaining unauthorized access to this report will be liable to compensate KLAS for the full retail price. Please see the KLAS DATA USE POLICY for information regarding use of this report. © 2025 KLAS Research, LLC. All Rights Reserved. NOTE: Performance scores may change significantly when including newly interviewed provider organizations, especially when added to a smaller sample size like in emerging markets with a small number of live clients. The findings presented are not meant to be conclusive data for an entire client base.

Related Segments

​