Meona (Global) Commentary
Filtered view: (Dach)
Subject Expert
Eder Lagemann
VP of Engagement
If you don't have a login, getting started is easy.
User Commentary
Meona has done a good job of meeting our needs for an electronic charting solution and medication...
I would not recommend Meona. If the system we will be moving to includes a good electronic charting...
The only problem with the solution is that my colleagues and I have had to create a lot of...
In terms of vision, Mesalvo would rate off the charts, but when it comes to implementation, they...
The vendor’s implementation times are very long. Often, Mesalvo installs an update, and then errors...
We have a list of issues from years ago that are still outstanding. I have requested that we have...
The support is very good. The support people are usually proactive. However, we do need to chase...
There is a new guideline coming into force, but the functionality to meet that guideline does not...
I wouldn't recommend this product. Mesalvo has a problem. There are many project managers who do...
We had an agreement on some functionality with Mesalvo. There was even a mock-up. But it wasn't...
Working groups are being formed by customers for certain diseases or certain treatment groups. All...
The integration is diabolical. We are unable to implement a significant number of interfaces that we...
The solution is comprehensible and intuitive. It works in principle. It is quite good.
Mesalvo used to be very good at meeting the needs of all their clients. But that led to us having to...
Meona's greatest strengths are its user friendliness and its intuitive usability.
Mesalvo needs to have faster response times when we have urgent needs.
In Meona, there are major gaps in billing, particularly when it comes to analysis and reports. Those...
The vendor’s greatest strength is the product’s ease of use for clinical users.
The biggest areas of improvement for the product are its quality and reliability.
Commentary Summary
Comment Type Breakout