Premium Reports
Contact KLAS
 Download Report Brief  Download Full Report    Zoom in charts

Preferences

   Bookmark

Related Series

Cardiology PACS 2006
|
2006
Cardiology PACS Study 2005
|
2005

Related Segments

 End chart zoom
Cardiology PACS 2007 Cardiology PACS 2007
* A page refresh may be necessary to see the updated image

Cardiology PACS 2007

 
October 18, 2007

As healthcare providers continue to scramble to find clinical efficiencies and operational effectiveness improvements in cardiology services, market needs expand beyond the cath and echo modalities into vascular, peripheral vascular and nuclear cardiology areas, providers more aggressively seek remote and Web access to imaging as well as reports and frustration increases with the lack of interface.

In this third annual Cardiology PACS (CPACS) report, KLAS investigates where CPACS vendors are having the most success or struggle in extending imaging systems to improve patient care, workflow and clinician satisfaction by leveraging technology. Providers share their insight and advice about how to improve selection and implementation of CPACS.

The report details product/vendor scoring for the following vendors:

  • AGFA
  • DIGISONICS
  • EMAGEON
  • GE
  • MCKESSON
  • OPTIMED
  • PHILIPS
  • PROSOLV (FUJIFILM)
  • RADINFO SYSTEMS
  • SCIMAGE
  • SIEMENS
  • THINKING SYSTEMS

Benefit from the advice of over 350 providers in this year’s 465-page report.

author - Robert Ellis
Project Manager
Robert Ellis
 Download Report Brief  Download Full Report

This material is copyrighted. Any organization gaining unauthorized access to this report will be liable to compensate KLAS for the full retail price. Please see the KLAS DATA USE POLICY for information regarding use of this report. © 2024 KLAS Research, LLC. All Rights Reserved. NOTE: Performance scores may change significantly when including newly interviewed provider organizations, especially when added to a smaller sample size like in emerging markets with a small number of live clients. The findings presented are not meant to be conclusive data for an entire client base.

Related Segments

​