Premium Reports
Patient Privacy Monitoring 2019
New

Patient Privacy Monitoring 2019
Who Stands Out in a Highly Competitive Market?

Authored by: | Read Time: 3 minutes

The patient privacy environment today includes heightened regulatory demands, constrained resources, and an increasing number of PHI breaches, which are often tied to inappropriate insider access. Organizations can no longer protect patient privacy and meet regulatory demands simply by combing audit logs. They need patient privacy monitoring vendors who deliver partner-level service and strong solutions that limit false positives. KLAS interviewed 106 provider organizations to find out which vendors excel in these areas and which decision factors are key in purchasing decisions today.

Key Findings

  1. Protenus, FairWarning (MPS), and Maize Analytics Excel at Meeting Needs
  2. Delivery Inconsistent from FairWarning (Non-MPS) and Iatric Systems
  3. Protenus, Maize Analytics, and FairWarning (MPS) Reduce False-Positive Burden on Customers
  4. FairWarning, Maize Analytics, and Protenus Often Considered; Purchasing Decisions Driven Largely by Ability to Reduce False Positives
 Download Report Brief  Download Full Report

This material is copyrighted. Any organization gaining unauthorized access to this report will be liable to compensate KLAS for the full retail price. Please see the KLAS DATA USE POLICY for information regarding use of this report. © 2019 KLAS Enterprises, LLC. All Rights Reserved. NOTE: Performance scores may change significantly when including newly interviewed provider organizations, especially when added to a smaller sample size like in emerging markets with a small number of live clients. The findings presented are not meant to be conclusive data for an entire client base.