Premium Reports
Contact KLAS
 Download Report Brief  Download Full Report    Zoom in charts



Related Series

Cardiology 2022
Cardiology 2020
Cardiovascular Structured Reporting 2018
Cardiology 2017
Cardiology 2016
Cardiology 2015
CVIS 2014
Cardiology 2013
Cardiology 2012
Cardiology 2011
Cardiology IT
In Search of a CVIS
Cardiology Reporting and Hemodynamics Report 2005

Related Segments

 End chart zoom
Cardiology Reporting 2007 Cardiology Reporting 2007
* A page refresh may be necessary to see the updated image

Cardiology Reporting 2007

March 2, 2007

KLAS' fourth report on Cardiology-related IT solutions takes an in-depth look at clinician focused Cardiology Reporting systems.

The report features ten products from nine vendors. There are eight products that qualify to be in the Main Body of the report: Agfa Heartlab Encompass, Emageon VERICIS (Camtronics), GE Centricity Cardiology Reporting, LUMEDX CardioDoc, McKesson Horizon Cardiology Reporting (Medcon), Philips Calysto (Witt), Philips Xcelera, and Siemens KinetDx.

In addition, an Early Data section features two vendors whose products have not yet met KLAS' minimum confidence level in order to be compared with the other vendors in the main body of the report. Information on these vendors does exist (to varying degrees) and is noted, as available. The Early Data vendors and their respective products include Goodroe CathSource and ProSolv Cardiovascular Reporting.

Questions answered in the report:

  • How vendors rank overall based on 40 performance Indicators
  • How the Cardiology Reporting Market Segment scores on average compared to the KLAS HIT Average
  • What percent of healthcare providers indicated that their CPACS vendor was the same as their Cardiology Reporting vendor?
  • Why Vendors Are Typically Selected
  • Why Vendors Are Typically NOT selected
  • Which vendors are considered in the Cardiology Reporting selection process?
  • What is the total number of procedures completed annually by survey participants?
  • What interfaces are implemented for the reporting system? What interfaces are missing?
  • What quantifiable benefits/results have the survey participants realized so far?
  • What functionality is missing, if any?
  • How well each vendor performs in several areas of functional strength – procedural documentation, management reporting, remote access, etc.
 Download Report Brief  Download Full Report

This material is copyrighted. Any organization gaining unauthorized access to this report will be liable to compensate KLAS for the full retail price. Please see the KLAS DATA USE POLICY for information regarding use of this report. © 2024 KLAS Research, LLC. All Rights Reserved. NOTE: Performance scores may change significantly when including newly interviewed provider organizations, especially when added to a smaller sample size like in emerging markets with a small number of live clients. The findings presented are not meant to be conclusive data for an entire client base.

Related Segments