Thank you !

Access info about Clinical Decision Support - Care Plans & Order Sets on your dashboard or bookmark under

(Your Products / Your Organization's Products)

We are currently researching Clinical Decision Support - Care Plans & Order Sets.

Will you help us?

Take A Survey

Premium Reports
 Download Report Brief  Download Full Report    Zoom in charts

Preferences

   Bookmark

Related Series

Clinical Decision Support 2020
|
2020
CDS 2016
|
2016
CDS Order Sets and Care Plans 2014
|
2014
Clinical Decision Support 2013
|
2013
Clinical Decision Support 2012
|
2012
Clinical Decision Support 2011
|
2011
Clinical Decision Support 2010
|
2010

Related Segments

Related Products

Related Vendors

 End chart zoom
CDS Point of Care Reference 2021 CDS Point of Care Reference 2021
* A page refresh may be necessary to see the updated image
New

CDS Point of Care Reference 2021
Cost Pressures & Competitive Options Top of Mind

author - Joe VanDeGraaff
Author
Joe VanDeGraaff
author - Jennifer Despain
Author
Jennifer Despain
 
October 5, 2021 | Read Time: 6  minutes

Current Time Inside Cache Tag Helper: 10/15/2021 6:31:08 PM and Model.reportId = 1834

Healthcare organizations typically use multiple clinical point-of-care reference systems to satisfy different users and address various use cases. But COVID-19 cost pressures, recent system updates, and the desire to standardize care have prompted organizations to reevaluate existing solutions and their CDS strategy. To help organizations navigate their options, this report seeks to illuminate the pros and cons of established clinical point-of-care solutions; it also provides an early look at the recent collaboration between EBSCO Information Services and IBM Watson Health.

Thank you !

Access info about Clinical Decision Support - Care Plans & Order Sets on your dashboard or bookmark under

(Your Products / Your Organization's Products)

We are currently researching Clinical Decision Support - Care Plans & Order Sets.

Will you help us?

Take A Survey

to see the full dataset.

if you don't have a login, getting started is easy.

Provider Organizations
Fill out our registration form to verify your organization.
HIT Companies
Contact a KLAS representative for plans and pricing.
Current Time Inside Cache Tag Helper: 10/15/2021 6:31:08 PM and Model.reportId = 1834

Key Findings:

  1. Strong Physician Preference for Wolters Kluwer Juxtaposed with Concerns about Cost
  2. EBSCO Content Drives Outcomes; Elsevier's Deep Content Difficult to Access at Point of Care
  3. New-to-Market EBSCO & IBM Offering Has Early Appeal; Support Structure Needs Clarity
  4. Elsevier & IBM Perceived as Slow with New Content Delivery; Wolters Kluwer Interface Seen as Outdated
  5. Unresponsive Support a Concern for Some IBM Customers; EBSCO Stands Out for Strong Relationships
  6. Solution Snapshots
author - Sarah Hanson
Writer
Sarah Hanson
author - Madison Fujimoto
Designer
Madison Fujimoto
author - Natalie Jamison
Project Manager
Natalie Jamison
 Download Report Brief  Download Full Report

This material is copyrighted. Any organization gaining unauthorized access to this report will be liable to compensate KLAS for the full retail price. Please see the KLAS DATA USE POLICY for information regarding use of this report. © 2021 KLAS Research, LLC. All Rights Reserved. NOTE: Performance scores may change significantly when including newly interviewed provider organizations, especially when added to a smaller sample size like in emerging markets with a small number of live clients. The findings presented are not meant to be conclusive data for an entire client base.