Tell us about you

Work Email required

Organization required

First Name required

Last Name required

Job Title required

Phone required (###) ###-####, or int ######...

City required

State/Province required

Tell us about your organization

error messages will go here...

Looks like we’re already familiar with you!

Please press next to continue with the survey.

Looks like we’re already familiar with you!

According to your account type you are not eligible to take surveys at this time. If this is a mistake, please contact KLAS.

If you are trying to access KLAS research data and reports, an email has been sent to   with a link to login.

If the email doesn't appear in your inbox, ask your IT department to add KLASresearch.com to your company spam filter's "whitelist", and check your email's spam folder.

Membership Commitment

In exchange for giving their feedback, healthcare providers can create an account to get access to industry reports, user commentary, and real-time ratings.

By submitting your account request, you are engaged in patient care as either an employee (or contractor) of your provider organization and that you confirm that you have reviewed and agree to abide by the Terms of Use for this website as updated periodically.

To learn more about how we process and protect your personal data, you may view our Privacy policy.

By submitting your account request, you confirm that you have reviewed and agree to abide by the Terms of Use for this website as updated periodically. To learn more about how we process and protect your personal data, you may view our Privacy policy.

By submitting your account request, you confirm that you have reviewed and agree to abide by the Terms of Use for this website as updated periodically.

To learn more about how we process and protect your personal data, you may view our Privacy policy.

 

To learn more about how we process and protect your personal data, you may view our Privacy policy.

 

To learn more about how we process and protect your personal data, you may view our Privacy policy.

Thank You! Your information was submitted successfully!

Next Steps - An email has been sent to . Please follow its instructions to verify your email, and login.

If the email doesn't appear in your inbox, try asking your IT department to add KLASresearch.com to your company spam filter's "whitelist", and checking your email's spam folder.

Thank You! Your information was submitted successfully!

Next Steps - A KLAS representative will contact you to discuss working with KLAS, typically within 24 to 48 hours.

If you have any further questions please contact info@klasresearch.com or 1-801-226-5120.

Surprise! Looks like we already have an account for you.

An email has been sent to blah@blah.com with a link to login.

If the email doesn't appear in your inbox, try asking your IT department to add KLASresearch.com to your company spam filter's "whitelist", and checking your email's spam folder.

Thank you !

Access info about Ambulatory EMR on your dashboard or bookmark under

(Your Products / Your Organization's Products)

Premium Reports
Subject Expert

Contact KLAS

info@klasresearch.com

801.226.5120

KLAS - Contact KLAS
 Download Report Brief  Download Full Report    Zoom in charts

Preferences

   Bookmark

Related Series

Ambulatory EMR Usability 2017
|
2017
Ambulatory EMR Usability 2013
|
2013

Related Segments

Related Products

Related Vendors

 End chart zoom
Is Ambulatory EMR Usability Improving?
* A page refresh may be necessary to see the updated image

Is Ambulatory EMR Usability Improving?

Authored by: Erik Bermudez June 18, 2015 | Read Time: 2  minutes

Current Time Inside Cache Tag Helper: 7/29/2021 9:27:30 AM and Model.reportId = 982

EMR vendors are being tasked with developing increasingly complex systems that are faster, more intuitive, and easier to use. While around two-thirds of physicians and physician leaders reported that a certain amount of progress had been made since 2013, there is still much work to be done, and data reveals significant usability differences.

Thank you !

Access info about Ambulatory EMR on your dashboard or bookmark under

(Your Products / Your Organization's Products)

Healthcare Providers,
Want to see more reports?

Not a Provider, contact us for pricing details.

HtmlReportContent Current Time Inside Cache Tag Helper: 7/29/2021 9:27:30 AM and Model.reportId= 982 and Model.HtmlReportContent_LastWriteTimeUtcInTicks=637505764166331302

1. ATHENAHEALTH AND EPIC HAVE THE BEST USABILITY

athenahealth and Epic lead the market in physician productivity and effectiveness. athenahealth is consistently improving their EMR’s usability by offering more effective quality improvement tools, engaging with physicians, and improving their CDS, problem list, and ePrescribing functionality, which is now robust. SAC’s customizability and Allscripts’ consistent development of SAC have enabled providers to reach a high degree of productivity and effectiveness.

usability productivity vs effectiveness

2. CERNER AND ECLINICALWORKS MAKE THE MOST PROGRESS

Many Cerner and eClinicalWorks customers reported moderate to significant usability improvements. Cerner has moved into the top tier of performers by engaging more with physicians, improving Dynamic Documentation, and enabling their EMR to adapt better across multiple specialties. eClinicalWorks has made meaningful improvements to their product’s usability, jumping from the eighth spot to the fourth. They provide a visually appealing user interface and are steadily improving the core functionality, particularly for medication reconciliation.

emr usability improvement over the past 2 years

3. GREENWAY SEES NO IMPROVEMENT; GE DROPS THREE SPOTS

While Greenway has pushed regular upgrades, providers have experienced post-upgrade software glitches, especially with v.17, that often hinder the usability. Customers also reported that the CDS functionality inhibits the overall usability, often describing the CDS piece as too complex, too intrusive, or not evident enough. Only 3 of 15 GE CPS EMR customers noted any overall usability improvement in the last two years. GE’s usability has suffered due to challenges with documentation and ePrescribing.

modular usability ratings

4. WIDENING GAP BETWEEN ALLSCRIPTS TOUCHWORKS EHR, NEXTGEN, AND TOP PERFORMERS

NextGen customers are able to highly customize the EHR, but these efforts are often lost and have to be redone because of complex upgrades that impede usability progress—less than half of providers say new features improve the usability. Allscripts TouchWorks EHR customers have found that strong customization tools are absent and promised ePrescribing functionality hasn’t come to fruition.

5. VENDORS DRIVE USABILITY THROUGH DIFFERENT APPROACHES

athenahealth and eClinicalWorks are the primary drivers of their EMRs’ usability and provide frequent, meaningful updates to the user experience. Epic and Cerner achieve usability success through an equal partnership with providers. Epic shares best practices and consistently develops new workflows and functionality. Cerner is moving toward a mentoring role by offering new, helpful tools, like playbooks. Allscripts customers appreciate being able to customize the flexible SAC technology.

vendor contribution to emr usability

 Download Report Brief  Download Full Report

This material is copyrighted. Any organization gaining unauthorized access to this report will be liable to compensate KLAS for the full retail price. Please see the KLAS DATA USE POLICY for information regarding use of this report. © 2021 KLAS Research, LLC. All Rights Reserved. NOTE: Performance scores may change significantly when including newly interviewed provider organizations, especially when added to a smaller sample size like in emerging markets with a small number of live clients. The findings presented are not meant to be conclusive data for an entire client base.