Premium Reports
Clinical Documentation Improvement (CDI) 2018

Clinical Documentation Improvement (CDI) 2018
Workflows and Prioritization Drive Quality and Financial Outcomes

Authored by: Daniel Zeitner and Paul Warburton September 13, 2018 | Read Time: 4  minutes

Current Time Inside Cache Tag Helper: 11/25/2020 3:51:40 AM and Model.reportId = 1266

Closing gaps in clinical documentation leads to improved revenue and higher documentation quality. Provider organizations using CDI tools need vendor partners who have proven solutions that can drive clinical and financial outcomes, enable smooth workflows in the midst of regulation changes, and prioritize CDI tasks to maximize the impact of clinical documentation specialists (CDSs). In examining these capabilities, this report primarily evaluates the performance of software vendors and their solutions, though CDI services firms are also evaluated regarding how well their guidance and training drive outcomes.

Healthcare Providers,
Want to see more reports?

Not a Provider, contact us for pricing details.

HtmlReportContent Current Time Inside Cache Tag Helper: 11/25/2020 3:51:40 AM and Model.reportId= 1266 and Model.HtmlReportContent_LastWriteTimeUtcInTicks=637406508366972646


Industry Insight & Context

CLINICAL DOCUMENTATION IMPROVEMENT


All operations within a hospital are impacted by EMR documentation. Ensuring the accuracy of that documentation is a challenge, and the complexity is increasing as healthcare regulations, reimbursements, and care practices evolve. Because of this complexity, provider organizations look to clinical documentation improvement (CDI) vendors to provide tools and services that improve efficiency and drive financial gains (which a majority of customers report achieving). The chart below shows the functionality and services CDI vendors offer and how frequently that functionality is adopted by the customers KLAS interviewed for this study.


cdi functionality and services being leveraged

stick football player iconA Note about Tackling Outpatient CDI

Across all vendors, provider organizations see significant revenue improvements when they use CDI tools and services. However, there are still major opportunities for development when it comes to outpatient documentation improvement. Provider organizations express high interest in this area, which is made complex by the myriad differences between the various outpatient specialties and the significant volume of outpatient services that most organizations have. This complexity can make it difficult to standardize software or determine where CDI efforts will have the greatest impact, but it also makes outpatient CDI an area of high opportunity. All vendors in this study are currently building out tools and collaborating with customers, but so far only MModal has a GA tool specific to the outpatient setting.



Clinical Documentation Improvement 2018


cdi software vendors

hand shake iconNuance, ChartWise Drive Strong Financial ROI; Iodine Drives Efficiency

Customers state that Nuance’s strong front-end education drives positive financial outcomes and that ongoing reporting and metric tracking give them clear visibility into the solution’s financial ROI. ChartWise customers see strong revenue improvement because the vendor is attuned to their needs and because the vendor’s proactive, nimble support helps customers fully leverage and optimize the solution. Iodine Software offers a high level of partnership, and their uniquely automated prioritization tool empowers CDSs to maximize their efficiency. The vendor relationship is lacking for many 3M customers, leaving them to drive outcomes on their own.


drives tangible outcomes

clip board iconIodine’s Prioritization Tools Disrupting CDI; 3M’s Overhyped

prioritization functionality current customer adoption and satisfactionOne of the biggest innovations in CDI over the last few years has been the creation of prioritization tools. Initially developed specifically for prioritization, Iodine Software’s robust tool stands out for the high levels of satisfaction it generates, and its highly accurate algorithms allow overtaxed CDSs to maximize their impact. Optum and 3M have seen increased adoption of their prioritization tools; results have varied. Optum customers report that markers help guide CDSs; more tweaking is needed to reduce false positives. 3M customers’ expectations for the new tool were set too high, and they struggle to get needed support when the tool doesn’t work as expected (e.g., it gives numerous false positives). ChartWise recommends customers hire adequate staff to review all documentation rather than use a prioritization tool, and many of their customers prefer to let CDSs determine their own workflows.


world network iconFor ChartWise, Nuance Customers, Efficient Workflows Stem from Integration and Training

vendor ability to help drive efficient workflowsIntegration and training can alleviate the CDI workflow challenges of having to work in multiple systems, a persistent pain point for physicians. Though all vendors can improve in this area, ChartWise has done more than others to develop EMR integration and facilitate smooth workflows. Both ChartWise and Nuance customers note receiving face-to-face training that helps them optimize CDS workflows. Nuance, 3M, and Optum offer integration between CAC and CDI functionality, which improves coder/CDS collaboration. Nuance’s broad technology platform (which includes NLP and the no-longer developed CAC solution) helps streamline workflows. 3M and Optum also offer broader platforms, though customers of both vendors want to see more nimble system development and improved issue resolution. 3M customers report lingering implementation challenges due to lack of knowledgeable support resources. MModal customers say the tool is easy to use and that CAPD functionality helps physicians improve initial documentation. nThrive customers report problems with double entry and upgrades that don’t address usability issues.


cdi services firms

blue ribbon iconClaro Healthcare Delivers Value and Satisfaction

value vs satisfactionFor help optimizing their CDI program or to outsource their CDI altogether, provider organizations often engage a CDI services firm. Among these firms, Claro Healthcare stands out for driving value. They do this by keeping promises made during the sales process and providing highly knowledgeable and skilled consultants who drive value through education. Navigant customers see value from highly knowledgeable consultants who help them mature their CDI program. Some Navigant customers feel the tool’s lack of functionality breadth limits the firm from driving value as highly as they could. Broader firms PwC and Huron have knowledgeable consultants with a great deal of CDI expertise that helps drive revenue improvement.

 Download Report Brief  Download Full Report

This material is copyrighted. Any organization gaining unauthorized access to this report will be liable to compensate KLAS for the full retail price. Please see the KLAS DATA USE POLICY for information regarding use of this report. © 2020 KLAS Research, LLC. All Rights Reserved. NOTE: Performance scores may change significantly when including newly interviewed provider organizations, especially when added to a smaller sample size like in emerging markets with a small number of live clients. The findings presented are not meant to be conclusive data for an entire client base.