Preferences
Related Series
Related Segments
Debt Collection Services 2023
How Are Firms Fostering Partnership & Driving Outcomes?
Amid current economic challenges, healthcare organizations are contracting with debt collection services firms (often multiple at a time) to ensure financial stability, leverage specialized expertise, and comply with complex regulations. These firms possess the resources and knowledge to efficiently and ethically recover unpaid medical bills—supporting positive patient relationships and saving time for health systems so they can focus on providing quality care. In a market where most firms perform highly, this report—KLAS’ first on debt collection services—examines which firms provide strong technology, foster partnerships, and drive outcomes across organization sizes.
Note: While there are many regional debt collection firms, this report focuses on firms with a national presence.
State Collection Service Highlighted for Proactive Communication & Expertise; RSi Clients See Firm as a Responsive Partner
State Collection Service stands out for delivering positive client experiences across organization sizes, though most respondents are larger organizations (1,001+ beds). Over 75% of respondents feel State Collection Service exceeds their expectations due to the firm’s proactive communication and ability to stay on top of changing state regulations. Additionally, clients highlight that the firm is an accommodating, easy-to-work-with partner and that staff interact well with patients during the collection process. Only one respondent reports they wouldn’t work with State Collection Service again, saying the firm didn’t provide the same speed and level of engagement as other firms.
“My favorite things about State Collection Service are their leadership team and their ability to help us. The firm wants to be a good partner. They want to adopt our values and work side by side with us. State Collection Service is one of my favorite firms because of the ease of communication and of working together. They are very good at those things.” —Director
RSi also works with organizations of all sizes. Over half of respondents are highly satisfied, rating the firm’s overall performance above 90 (on a 100-point scale); further, all respondents but one are pleased with the value they receive from RSi’s services. RSi is described as a good, responsive partner due to the quality of their staff, who are noted as being open, honest, and transparent. One less-satisfied respondent wishes the firm’s team had better aligned with the client organization; another reports RSi’s performance could improve, noting that their own organization achieved better outcomes than the firm did.
“We have had a good experience with RSi. They have a great team that always keeps in close contact with us. Their CEO is very hands on in terms of client relationships. Anytime there is an issue or something we need to talk about, the firm is quick to jump on a call and work through things. We have had a good relationship over the years.” —Director
Clients of Balanced Healthcare Receivables* Report Strong Value through Consistent Collections
Interviewed clients of Balanced Healthcare Receivables (BHR)* are highly satisfied with the firm’s services. All respondents report receiving value and feel the firm drives outcomes by achieving favorable collection rates and providing consistent results with no red tape. Clients also appreciate BHR’s inbound call model for its short hold times, which reduce the dropped-call rate.
*Limited data
“We are receiving our money’s worth with Balanced Healthcare Receivables; they take on a burden for us that we do not have the bandwidth for. We see success with payments coming in. Balanced Healthcare Receivables is very consistent. We see results. Balanced Healthcare Receivables is a great firm to work with, and we have had no red tape throughout the years we have been with Balanced Healthcare Receivables.” —Director
Firstsource* Technology Enhances Execution; ARStrat* Shows Signs of Inconsistent Delivery across Client Sizes
Firstsource* respondents highlight the firm’s ability to execute engagements, citing their online presence, portal that facilitates easy patient payments, and lack of issues during file transfers and other account maintenance. Respondents also note that compared to other companies, Firstsource has more advanced technology for patients and healthcare organizations and that the firm leverages this technology to increase collection rates.
*Limited data
“Firstsource is making strides to leverage technology more than other agencies. They are using electronic communication other than just phone calls or mail to contact patients and give them an opportunity to pay. That area is one the firm has really employed that other agencies haven’t employed to the same extent.” —Director
Highly satisfied ARStrat* respondents appreciate the firm’s stable leadership and strong partnership. They also report that the firm’s resources plan ahead and collaborate to accomplish client goals. In general, interviewed clients are less satisfied with the firm’s technology and online presence; respondents note that ARStrat doesn’t currently have a client portal or a way for patients to pay online. A couple of smaller organizations (a clinic and a hospital with 1–200 beds) report unkept promises and poor communication as well.
*Limited data
“ARStrat bends over backward to give us anything that we want. I have had the same representatives for a long time, and I know them personally. They call to check in. Even the top-level executives call me to make sure that I am happy. They sincerely want to make sure that everything is good with us. Sometimes ARStrat has limitations with slowness in their tech department. We will ask them for something, and they will say they will get it to us today, but it ends up taking a week or so.” —Director
Despite Variation in Client Experience, All Firms Maintain a Positive Patient Experience
Healthcare organizations face a difficult challenge with balancing the need to collect money for delivered services while also preserving good patient relationships, and they want their debt collection firms to contribute to maintaining these relationships as the firms work to recover funds from delinquent accounts. Early insights show that all measured firms generally do well maintaining a positive patient experience. As KLAS gathers more data on patient satisfaction with debt collection firms, we will provide further firm-differentiating insights.
About This Report
Each year, KLAS interviews thousands of healthcare professionals about the IT solutions and services their organizations use. For this report, interviews were conducted between October 2022 and October 2023 using KLAS’ standard quantitative evaluation for healthcare services, which is composed of 9 numeric ratings questions and 3 yes/no questions, all weighted equally. Combined, the ratings for these questions make up the overall performance score, which is measured on a 100-point scale. The questions are organized into five client experience pillars—loyalty, operations, relationship, services, and value.
To supplement the client satisfaction data gathered with the standard evaluation, KLAS also asked interviewed clients the following question specific to debt collection services: on a scale of 1–9, how satisfied are you with your firm’s ability to maintain a positive patient experience?
Sample Sizes
Unless otherwise noted, sample sizes displayed throughout this report (e.g., n=16) represent the total number of unique client organizations interviewed for a given firm or service. However, it should be noted that to allow for the representation of differing perspectives within any one client organization, samples may include surveys from different individuals at the same organization. The table below shows the total number of unique organizations interviewed for each firm or service as well as the total number of individual respondents.
Some respondents choose not to answer particular questions, meaning the sample size for any given firm or solution can change from question to question. When the number of unique organization responses for a particular question is less than 10, the score for that question is marked with an asterisk (*) or otherwise designated as “limited data.” If the sample size is less than 5, no score is shown. Where textual content relies on limited data, the firm name is marked with an asterisk. Note that when a firm has a low number of reporting sites, the possibility exists for KLAS scores to change significantly as new surveys are collected.
Writer
Natalie Hopkins
Designer
Jessica Bonnett
Project Manager
Sydney Toomer
This material is copyrighted. Any organization gaining unauthorized access to this report will be liable to compensate KLAS for the full retail price. Please see the KLAS DATA USE POLICY for information regarding use of this report. © 2026 KLAS Research, LLC. All Rights Reserved. NOTE: Performance scores may change significantly when including newly interviewed provider organizations, especially when added to a smaller sample size like in emerging markets with a small number of live clients. The findings presented are not meant to be conclusive data for an entire client base.