Premium Reports
 Download Report Brief  Download Full Report    Zoom in charts

Preferences

   Bookmark

Related Series

EDIS 2013
|
2013
EDIS 2011
|
2011
EDIS 2010 - Functionality vs. Integration
|
2010
Emergency Department Information Systems
|
2009
EDIS Perception Study 2007
|
2007
Emergency Department Report 2006
|
2006

 End chart zoom
Emergency Department Systems 2008 Emergency Department Systems 2008
* A page refresh may be necessary to see the updated image

Emergency Department Systems 2008

July 2, 2008

Current Time Inside Cache Tag Helper: 10/27/2021 10:43:28 PM and Model.reportId = 456

Hospital executives now recognize that ED automation is almost essential for today’s healthcare environment. ED automation helps solve many of the problems that ED environments face today including increased patient volumes, clinician shortages, and compliance with patient safety standards.

HtmlReportContent Current Time Inside Cache Tag Helper: 10/27/2021 10:43:28 PM and Model.reportId= 456 and Model.HtmlReportContent_LastWriteTimeUtcInTicks=637406508563380239

As hospitals realize the effectiveness of ED automated solutions to fill many of their pressing needs, adoption rates as well as individual site usage have steadily increased and will continue to do so.

The ongoing debate regarding feature/function versus enterprise/integration continues. However, improved interfacing among standalone vendors has given them more opportunities to win contracts, and compelled providers to look more thoroughly at features and functions than they may have previously.

Best-of-breed EDIS vendors generally deliver more robust functionality, are easier to use, and are more customizable, but need to interface to third-party clinicals. On the other hand, enterprise EDIS vendor products are maturing, with more focus on making the solution match ED clinician workflow. They continue to enjoy significant wins as a result of being part of larger enterprise decisions.

Products qualifying for ranking in this 651 page Emergency Department Systems report were:

  • Allscripts HealthMatics ED
  • Cerner Millennim FirstNet
  • Eclipsys Sunrise Emergency Care
  • EmpowER Systems Empower ED
  • Epic ASAP ED
  • McKesson Horizon Emergency Care
  • MEDHOST EDMS
  • Meditech C/S EDM
  • Picis ED PulseCheck
  • T-System T-SystemEV
  • Wellsoft EDIS

Early findings were also included for CMR, EDIMS EDIM, Emergisoft EmergisoftED, LOGICARE OnTrack, and PCTS Amelior .

 Download Report Brief  Download Full Report

This material is copyrighted. Any organization gaining unauthorized access to this report will be liable to compensate KLAS for the full retail price. Please see the KLAS DATA USE POLICY for information regarding use of this report. © 2021 KLAS Research, LLC. All Rights Reserved. NOTE: Performance scores may change significantly when including newly interviewed provider organizations, especially when added to a smaller sample size like in emerging markets with a small number of live clients. The findings presented are not meant to be conclusive data for an entire client base.