Preferences
Related Series
Related Segments


Implementation Services for Workday ERP 2023
Part of a Series on ERP Implementations
KLAS’ recent Decision Insights data shows a large number of organizations are purchasing Workday’s enterprise resource planning (ERP) software, and for these organizations, a strong implementation partner is vital. This report examines the firms that provide leadership for implementations of Workday’s ERP suite. (Engagements for implementing other vendors’ ERP solutions are excluded from this research; KLAS plans to publish future research on firms that implement Infor’s and Oracle’s ERP platforms.)
ERP Software Vendor
Defined
ERP software vendors who provide implementation services for their own ERP software—either leading the implementation, offering project management, or otherwise providing support.
Workday’s Implementation Engagements Generally Effective, though Standardized
Workday was validated for small to midsize projects (though KLAS is aware of some larger projects) where the vendor’s own services team implemented the ERP solution. Overall, clients feel their implementations went well, especially in keeping to timelines, and many appreciate the consistency and experience of Workday’s resources. Interviewed clients say Workday takes a standardized approach and is less flexible around configuring the implementation to clients’ needs. A couple of clients regret not bringing in another firm to help with organizational change management (an aspect Workday does not address), feeling this would have smoothed the go-live and improved adoption.
Business Transformation and Implementation Leadership Firms
Defined
Firms acting as the overall implementation leader for highly complex ERP projects. Projects require business transformation, application implementation management, and technical expertise. Engagements often span the implementation life cycle and are strategic in nature. They are typically with larger health systems and include >10 consultants.
For Very Large Organizations and High Complexity, KPMG Stands Out as a Partner Due to Deep Bench of Technical Resources and Expertise
For more-complex engagements, KPMG leads with consistent delivery and excellent resources. Clients highlight consultants’ hard work, trustworthiness, and commitment. They also mention KPMG’s deep bench of technical, industry-experienced experts who provide best practices. Most respondents see KPMG as a strategic partner. Those who are least satisfied point to gaps in strategic and best-practice contributions, particularly around execution and integration, leading to post-implementation challenges. PwC (limited data) also delivers consistently for very large organizations, though on narrower engagements—respondents implemented one ERP pillar each (HR for three, supply chain for one). Clients describe PwC as a good partner that goes above and beyond the scope of work to ensure success. Consultants identify issues and help solve them. Clients share PwC could improve cross-functional communication and knowledge transfer to consultants performing the work. One client faced turnover challenges among PwC resources that they felt limited the transformational aspects of the project.
Interviewed clients report a mixed experience with Deloitte (limited data), who was engaged by some of the largest organizations in this research for highly complex Workday ERP implementations. Client-reported strengths include Deloitte’s implementation process, project and change management, and tactical ability. While the firm is seen as expensive overall, clients say they consistently avoid charging for every little thing. All three respondents say they would engage Deloitte again. On a less positive note, all three report some significant challenges: lack of consultant experience after being sold on their expertise, execution misses that required rework, and/or difficulty connecting industry best practices with change management and unique aspects of the organization. Deloitte clients want to see more leadership and guidance.
High Satisfaction with Huron Driven by Strong Consultants and Consistent Execution
Huron clients highlight consistent execution by the firm. The vast majority took a transformational approach, and all of these clients feel the firm exceeded their expectations. Respondents point to strong partnership and executive involvement. Clients feel Huron understood their culture and long-term interests. Respondents also mention the firm brought a playbook of best practices, which helped guide the implementation and change management. Consultants are seen as knowledgeable and skilled. A couple of clients mention resource misses and say Huron was responsive, replacing or adding resources as needed. Avaap (limited data) is validated mostly for transformational ERP implementations that are less complex on average than others in this research. Interviewed clients often describe Avaap as a strong partner with excellent technical expertise who kept their Workday implementation on track. The least satisfied respondent wanted to see stronger project management with more concrete metrics; they also experienced inconsistent resource quality (though lesser-quality resources were replaced quickly). One other client felt the firm’s supply chain and HR expertise was insufficient.
Implementation Leadership Firms
Defined
Firms engaged to provide overall project leadership/management for low/moderate-complexity projects. Provide application implementation management, project management, and technical expertise. Most include some change management. Typical engagements are with small/midsize health systems and include <10 consultants.
CrossVue and Collaborative Solutions Inconsistent; Impact Advisors (Limited Data) Exceeds Expectations
CrossVue, a cross-industry firm, frequently delivers a satisfactory experience. Satisfied clients say the firm exceeded their expectations around customization, request turnaround time, individual partnership, and service/support. Clients share CrossVue can be a strong partner, highlighting the firm’s ability to help solve problems, not just install software. A couple of clients report gaps in strategic guidance, specifically noting that they felt unprepared for next steps. Of the four dissatisfied respondents, all note frustration with inconsistent resource quality, and some report communication challenges with individual resources.
Collaborative Solutions, a Cognizant Company, is a global cross-industry firm providing implementation leadership and consulting. Interviewed clients report an inconsistent experience with the firm’s resources. More-satisfied clients highlight the strength of the firm’s project managers and their partnership. A couple of clients mention flexibility during contracting, and all say the firm avoids charging for every little thing. Less-satisfied clients more often had transformational engagements. Some respondents say consultants were less knowledgeable than they appeared and, in some cases, lacked sufficient subject-matter expertise. A couple of clients also report post-go-live issues that required additional work.
Impact Advisors (limited data) is a healthcare-specific consulting firm and one of Workday’s newest ERP implementation partners. The firm is seen as a partner by clients and often described as honest and trustworthy. Respondents share they have access to executive-level leadership for guidance or other help. Consultants are high quality, get along well with the organizational teams, and are knowledgeable. Impact Advisors is viewed as expensive but worth the money. Clients say resources also help connect clients with other experts as needed and go out of their way to highlight areas for clients to focus on outside the statement of work.
Top Recommendations from Firms for a Successful Workday ERP Implementation
- Determine your strategic vision and expected outcomes up front
- Clearly define project governance and decision-making structures
- Don’t neglect the change management process as part of the implementation
Each firm’s complete response can be found in the full report.
How KLAS Can Help:
KLAS’ new Landmark Insights initiative focuses on helping organizations successfully navigate large HIT implementations. At strategic points in the process, KLAS conducts in-depth interviews with all stakeholders to identify misalignment and detect and address problems early. Early insights from this initiative can be found here. To learn more about how to participate, visit the KLAS website or contact the Landmark Insights team at landmark@klasresearch.com.
About This Report
Each year, KLAS interviews thousands of healthcare professionals about the IT solutions and services their organizations use. For this report, interviews were conducted over the last 18 months using KLAS’ standard quantitative evaluation for healthcare services, which is composed of 9 numeric ratings questions and 3 yes/no questions, all weighted equally. Combined, the ratings for these questions make up the overall performance score, which is measured on a 100-point scale. The questions are organized into five customer experience pillars—loyalty, operations, relationship, services, and value.
This report focuses specifically on implementations of Workday’s ERP suite. Workday has dedicated partners for their implementations, with different levels of partnership achieved based on experience. A list of these partners and more information about them can be found here.
Sample Sizes
Unless otherwise noted, sample sizes displayed throughout this report (e.g., n=16) represent the total number of unique client organizations interviewed for a given firm or service. However, it should be noted that to allow for the representation of differing perspectives within any one client organization, samples may include surveys from different individuals at the same organization. The table to the right shows the total number of unique organizations interviewed for each firm or service as well as the total number of individual respondents.
Some respondents choose not to answer particular questions, meaning the sample size for any given firm or service can change from question to question. When the number of unique organization responses for a particular question is less than 6, the score for that question is marked with an asterisk (*) or otherwise designated as “limited data.” If the sample size is less than 3, no score is shown. Note that when a firm has a low number of reporting sites, the possibility exists for KLAS scores to change significantly as new surveys are collected.

Writer
Amanda Wind

Designer
Madison Moniz
This material is copyrighted. Any organization gaining unauthorized access to this report will be liable to compensate KLAS for the full retail price. Please see the KLAS DATA USE POLICY for information regarding use of this report. © 2025 KLAS Research, LLC. All Rights Reserved. NOTE: Performance scores may change significantly when including newly interviewed provider organizations, especially when added to a smaller sample size like in emerging markets with a small number of live clients. The findings presented are not meant to be conclusive data for an entire client base.