Tell us about you

Work Email required

Organization required

First Name required

Last Name required

Job Title required

Phone required (###) ###-####, or int ######...

City required

State/Province required

Tell us about your organization

error messages will go here...

Looks like we’re already familiar with you!

Please press next to continue with the survey.

Looks like we’re already familiar with you!

According to your account type you are not eligible to take surveys at this time. If this is a mistake, please contact KLAS.

If you are trying to access KLAS research data and reports, an email has been sent to   with a link to login.

If the email doesn't appear in your inbox, ask your IT department to add KLASresearch.com to your company spam filter's "whitelist", and check your email's spam folder.

Membership Commitment

In exchange for giving their feedback, healthcare providers can create an account to get access to industry reports, user commentary, and real-time ratings.

By submitting your account request, you are engaged in patient care as either an employee (or contractor) of your provider organization and that you confirm that you have reviewed and agree to abide by the Terms of Use for this website as updated periodically.

To learn more about how we process and protect your personal data, you may view our Privacy policy.

By submitting your account request, you confirm that you have reviewed and agree to abide by the Terms of Use for this website as updated periodically. To learn more about how we process and protect your personal data, you may view our Privacy policy.

By submitting your account request, you confirm that you have reviewed and agree to abide by the Terms of Use for this website as updated periodically.

To learn more about how we process and protect your personal data, you may view our Privacy policy.

 

To learn more about how we process and protect your personal data, you may view our Privacy policy.

 

To learn more about how we process and protect your personal data, you may view our Privacy policy.

Thank You! Your information was submitted successfully!

Next Steps - An email has been sent to . Please follow its instructions to verify your email, and login.

If the email doesn't appear in your inbox, try asking your IT department to add KLASresearch.com to your company spam filter's "whitelist", and checking your email's spam folder.

Thank You! Your information was submitted successfully!

Next Steps - A KLAS representative will contact you to discuss working with KLAS, typically within 24 to 48 hours.

If you have any further questions please contact info@klasresearch.com or 1-801-226-5120.

Surprise! Looks like we already have an account for you.

An email has been sent to blah@blah.com with a link to login.

If the email doesn't appear in your inbox, try asking your IT department to add KLASresearch.com to your company spam filter's "whitelist", and checking your email's spam folder.

Premium Reports
Subject Expert

Contact KLAS

info@klasresearch.com

801.226.5120

KLAS - Contact KLAS
 Download Report Brief  Download Full Report    Zoom in charts

Preferences

   Bookmark

Related Series

Quality, Patient Safety, and Risk Management 2017
|
2017
Quality Management 2014
|
2014
Quality Management 2013
|
2013

 End chart zoom
Quality Management 2019
* A page refresh may be necessary to see the updated image

Quality Management 2019
The Search for a One-Stop Shop

Authored by: Ryan Pretnik and Shea Smart March 12, 2019 | Read Time: 2  minutes

Current Time Inside Cache Tag Helper: 7/26/2021 11:00:06 PM and Model.reportId = 1287

Expectations for quality management vendors have shifted—while provider organizations were previously satisfied with basic regulatory reporting tools, they are now looking for a single platform that provides more robust quality improvement functionality. However, development from several quality management vendors has remained fairly stagnant, and many organizations find they must fill the gaps with population health management tools, EMRs, and BI solutions. Against this backdrop, this report explores (1) the correlation between trust and customer loyalty, (2) customer satisfaction with current functionality, and (3) which vendors use strong guidance to ensure customer success.

Healthcare Providers,
Want to see more reports?

Not a Provider, contact us for pricing details.

HtmlReportContent Current Time Inside Cache Tag Helper: 7/26/2021 11:00:06 PM and Model.reportId= 1287 and Model.HtmlReportContent_LastWriteTimeUtcInTicks=637534095316969551

Conduent Has Yet to Deliver on Juvo Promises; IBM Watson Health Customers Least Likely to Stay

customer loyalty vs vendor keeps all promisesPrimarily due to unkept promises regarding the long-awaited Juvo platform, customers of market share leader Conduent have reported an almost 10-point drop in satisfaction over the last year, and several are considering other vendors. Delays with the new platform have exacerbated frustrations with Conduent’s existing technology, which customers view as antiquated, saying they must have in-depth coding and SQL knowledge to effectively use it. IBM Watson Health (Truven) customers are the least likely to say they would buy their product again or stay with their vendor long term. Customers feel IBM has done little to develop new technology and is less focused on relationships than Truven was.


Ambulatory-Focused Vendors Satisfy Regulatory Needs; Development from Premier and Vizient Remains Stagnant

product has needed functionalityAmbulatory organizations who don’t want more than compliance reporting are highly satisfied with the easy-to-use tools from Mingle Health, Healthmonix, and SPH Analytics. Premier and Vizient customers report much lower functionality satisfaction. While Premier’s compliance reporting is satisfactory for both acute and ambulatory care organizations, functionality beyond that—specifically the data-visualization and reporting tools—is difficult to use without a technical background. As a result, end users may pull the wrong data, causing them to perceive it as inaccurate. Vizient customers would like more-timely data and the ability to view data across an entire IDN instead of just at the individual organization level. Historically, Vizient customers reported that the regulatory reporting was not kept up to date. To fill this gap, in April 2018, Vizient partnered with Medisolv to provide customers with Medisolv’s MIPS and eCQM reporting.


Nuance, Medisolv Dedicate Resources to Helping Customers Optimize Their Data

proactive service vs percent highly satisfiedNuance and Medisolv both offer highly proactive service, which contributes to their high percentages of highly satisfied customers. Nuance provides dedicated support staff, and in their regular webinars, Nuance shares best practices and walks customers through regulatory changes. Many members of Medisolv’s dedicated support team have clinical backgrounds, enabling them to build relationships with and effectively explain the tool to end users. Conduent has the lowest percentage of customers that are highly satisfied, and many feel Conduent’s guidance leaves much to be desired. Customers report that Conduent’s support staff takes a passive approach to helping customers improve quality and often takes days to respond to requests for help.


Vendor Bottom Lines

vendor bottom lines
 Download Report Brief  Download Full Report

This material is copyrighted. Any organization gaining unauthorized access to this report will be liable to compensate KLAS for the full retail price. Please see the KLAS DATA USE POLICY for information regarding use of this report. © 2021 KLAS Research, LLC. All Rights Reserved. NOTE: Performance scores may change significantly when including newly interviewed provider organizations, especially when added to a smaller sample size like in emerging markets with a small number of live clients. The findings presented are not meant to be conclusive data for an entire client base.