Who is theKLAS Category Leader?



How do they score? In five key performance categories

Market Segment Average   EBSCO Information Services


Sales & Contracting

Implementation & Training

Functionality & Upgrades

Service & Support

General

50
100

Solutions Not Ranked

Limited Data Products

Score

Component [C], Not Primary [NP], Regional [R] or Limited Market Share [MS]

*Does not meet minimum KLAS Konfidence level.

Trend does not include the Best KLAS score

See the latest BEST IN KLAS 2018

2024 Best in KLAS Awards - Global Software
2024 GLOBAL
2024 Best in KLAS Awards - Software and Services
2024 BEST IN KLAS

How do Clinical Decision Support - Point of Care Clinical Reference solutions compare?


EBSCO Information Services Logo
EBSCO Health DynaMed and DynaMed Plus (disease reference)
Konfidence
Average for Clinical Decision Support - Point of Care Clinical Reference90.9
50
 
100
 

2

EBSCO Information Services Logo
EBSCO Health Nursing Reference Center (nursing reference)
 
 

3

Elsevier Logo
Clinical Pharmacology powered by ClinicalKey (drug reference)
 
 

4

IBM Logo
Truven Health Micromedex Medication Management (drug reference)
 
 

4

Wolters Kluwer Logo
Lexicomp Online (drug reference)
 
 

6

Wolters Kluwer Logo
UpToDate (disease reference)
 
Software 80.0
 

Past Clinical Decision Support - Point of Care Clinical Reference Awards

Konfidence

Konfidence level
Konfidence Level Description
Products must have at least 30 live organizations participating for software and at least 15 live organizations for professional services. Exception to this is Transcription Services (30).
Products must have at least 20 live organizations participating for software and at least 10 live organizations for professional services. Exception to this is Transcription Services (20).
Products must have at least 15 live organizations participating for software and at least 6 live organizations for professional services. Exception to this is Transcription Services
-
The Konfidence level on this product rating is low. These results are for early trend detection. As more performance data is received, the result is likely to have a wide variance.
​