Preferences
Related Series
Imprivata Digital Identity Platform 2022
Benefits & Challenges of Deep Adoption
Amid a changing workforce and mounting security pressures, healthcare organizations recognize the growing need for a holistic approach to managing digital identities. The development and adoption of HIT solutions capable of enabling a holistic strategy are in an early state, with most organizations leveraging multiple vendors to manage things such as identity, access, and compliance. Previous KLAS research found that Imprivata—whose single sign-on solution has a large healthcare footprint—is currently the only vendor to offer a broad digital identity platform. Building on that research, this report explores the potential benefits and challenges of deeply adopting Imprivata’s offerings. Insights come from in-depth interviews with 6 organizations identified by Imprivata as “deep adopters” as well as from 15 organizations within the vendor’s broader customer base (referred to in this report as “general adopters”). Other vendors will be evaluated as their solutions expand to offer broad capabilities.
KLAS-Measured Components of Imprivata Digital ldentity Platform
A Note about SecureLink
During the course of this research, Imprivata finalized their acquisition of SecureLink, including the Maize Analytics patient privacy monitoring solution. Customers of this multiyear Best in KLAS product report high value from the solution’s AI/ML capabilities and strong training and support. KLAS will continue to monitor the impact of the acquisition and how Imprivata incorporates the solution into their digital identity platform.
For Deep Adopters, Optimism about Vision and Future Overshadows Current Challenges
The Imprivata digital identity platform is used deeply by a small portion of the vendor’s very large healthcare customer base. These customers have adopted multiple digital identity products from Imprivata and can offer insight into the platform’s readiness for the customer base at large. Despite real product challenges (specifically on the compliance side), the deep adopters interviewed by KLAS generally give Imprivata’s digital identity platform a thumbs-up due to their high confidence in Imprivata based on strong executive-level relationships. They do note a few opportunities for Imprivata to improve their implementation process and make resources available to help set customers up for success—one deep adopter had difficulty setting up the identity governance solution and wanted more help scaling the product; another has felt a lack of connection with Imprivata following the implementation and has not yet seen an ROI. A few deep adopters report that while they are optimistic about Imprivata’s innovation, they sometimes take a wait-and-see approach with new developments to ensure the technology is on par with other offerings in the market.
“Imprivata does pretty well in the modern workspace. In fact, the product works as well as anything else out there, from what I can tell. In the hybrid world that we live in now, Imprivata is the only game I see in town. Part of the reason that I would shop for anything else is that it has been over five years since we implemented this technology.” —CIO
Impact on Clinician Efficiency Unquestioned; Impact on Security Still Developing
In healthcare, a digital identity platform needs to serve clinicians while also facilitating greater security. Both deep and general adopters of Imprivata report a strong, positive impact on clinicians—users find the SSO to be a lifesaver, facilitating instant logins to critical applications and reducing wasted time. Feedback on Imprivata’s security impact is mixed. Customers that report increased security note better authentication practices, locked workstations, and reduced instances of passwords being visibly posted on computers. Other organizations struggle to find the right balance in maintaining security best practices without frustrating clinicians with things like frequent system time-outs. These customers actively look for more guidance from Imprivata on how to best leverage the tools to secure their environments.
“The product has changed the lives of our clinicians. They are happier today than they have ever been. . . . The product has been a game changer for our clinicians. The number-one goal of deploying Imprivata’s system was to enhance clinician satisfaction, and it most certainly has done that.” —CISO
“We can make our environment more secure, but doing that is not easy. One of our goals with Imprivata IAM Suite was to enhance security. We have done that by limiting the life of a session. I would love to trim time-outs even more to enhance our security, but that is like squeezing water out of a stone. We are in a very happy place with the product. The product gets us where we want to be, but I wish we could squeeze some more out of it. I am not sure how best to do that.” —CISO
Intrasuite Product Integration Still Early
Across healthcare, strong intrasuite product integration often lags when vendors rapidly expand through acquisition. Deep adopters of the Imprivata platform report varied experiences with integration between the vendor’s various products and modules. One deep adopter scored Imprivata a 9 (out of 9) for integration (both internal and external), describing integration as a strong point for the vendor. Conversely, a less-satisfied customer specifically highlighted identity governance as an area in which integration is lacking. However, based on Imprivata’s track record, deep adopters who report integration challenges are optimistic that improvements will come. General adopters are much less likely to be satisfied with Imprivata’s integration with external solutions, and some note that other IAM vendors they use don’t have as many integration challenges. In particular, general adopters using Imprivata’s drug diversion and patient privacy monitoring solutions are more likely to report integration challenges.
“To me, a perfect score looks like a system where everything will talk to itself, and we would know about everything that we have already built and configured for single sign-on and vice versa. Currently, we use a separate product for that. I did like the integration between the MFA and single sign-on functionality. That has worked out nicely. That integration has allowed us to rapidly deploy MFA. It is just the identity governance portion that is off on its own.” —CIO
Relationships Drive Customers to Go Deep with Imprivata; Increased Partnership Is a Key Benefit
Imprivata’s track record of customer success has been a key driver for the early deep adopters of the vendor’s digital identity platform. All respondents who shared their organization’s motivations for going deep with Imprivata cite prior experience with the vendor as a decision factor, and nearly all report a high level of partnership as the biggest benefit. Deep adopters receive a high level of involvement from Imprivata’s executive leadership team and report benefits from the technology in the form of convenience for their clinicians and automation of historically manual processes.
“A good thing about Imprivata is that their roots are in healthcare. They have obviously moved more to the security side, but they have always been there to help providers and enable what providers do. Partnering with Imprivata was a win for us. Our providers have a level of trust in Imprivata that other companies on the security side may not have. We looked at a bunch of nonclinical cybersecurity companies, but those companies did too much. We needed an identity governance system so that we could interface it with our ERP system and put in logins based on titles. Other companies wanted to sell us a complete suite of products, but Imprivata just sold us what we needed. That worked out well for us.” —CIO
Customers Not Adopting Imprivata Deeply Still Value Niche Solutions
Nearly two-thirds of interviewed general adopters have considered using Imprivata’s digital identity platform more deeply, though few report near-term plans to make that jump. Reported barriers include cost concerns or lack of funding, the ability to achieve better integration with non-Imprivata products, and other IT priorities. Those not considering deeper adoption of Imprivata are invested in other products and not looking to switch or aren’t aware of Imprivata’s broader offerings. Use of multiple vendors is the norm in the IAM market, and vendors commonly used to augment Imprivata’s offering include Microsoft and Duo for MFA, SailPoint and Micro Focus for IDG, and VMware for mobile device management. Nearly all respondents who use a third-party product say they are unlikely to switch to Imprivata or are unsure of their future plans.
“We use another platform for both internal and external digital identities, and that platform meets our needs. Imprivata is one of those vendors that started in SSO and grew into the digital identity area. But digital identity isn’t the vendor’s core competency. I don’t think their products are as mature as some others.” —CTO
About This Report
The data in this report comes from two sources: (1) KLAS’ standard quantitative evaluation for healthcare software, and (2) supplemental evaluations tailored specifically for Imprivata deep adopters and general adopters. Interviews were conducted over the last 12 months.
Each year, KLAS interviews thousands of healthcare professionals about the IT solutions and services their organizations use. For this report, interviews were conducted over the last 12 months using KLAS’ standard quantitative evaluation for healthcare software, which is composed of 16 numeric ratings questions and 4 yes/no questions, all weighted equally. Combined, the ratings for these questions make up the overall performance score, which is measured on a 100-point scale. The questions are organized into six customer experience pillars—culture, loyalty, operations, product, relationship, and value.
To supplement the customer satisfaction data gathered with the standard evaluation, KLAS also created two supplemental evaluations to delve deeper into several questions specific to the customer experiences of deep adopters and general adopters.
Sample Sizes
Unless otherwise noted, sample sizes displayed throughout this report (e.g., n=16) represent the total number of unique customer organizations interviewed for a given vendor or solution. However, it should be noted that to allow for the representation of differing perspectives within any one customer organization, samples may include surveys from different individuals at the same organization. The table below shows the total number of unique organizations interviewed for each type of adopter as well as the total number of individual respondents.
Some respondents choose not to answer particular questions, meaning the sample size can change from question to question. When the number of unique organization responses for a particular question is less than 15, the score for that question is marked with an asterisk (*) or otherwise designated as “limited data.” If the sample size is less than 6, no score is shown. Note that when a vendor has a low number of reporting sites, the possibility exists for KLAS scores to change significantly as new surveys are collected.
Writer
Elizabeth Pew
Designer
Madison Moniz
Project Manager
Robert Ellis
This material is copyrighted. Any organization gaining unauthorized access to this report will be liable to compensate KLAS for the full retail price. Please see the KLAS DATA USE POLICY for information regarding use of this report. © 2024 KLAS Research, LLC. All Rights Reserved. NOTE: Performance scores may change significantly when including newly interviewed provider organizations, especially when added to a smaller sample size like in emerging markets with a small number of live clients. The findings presented are not meant to be conclusive data for an entire client base.