Tell us about you

Work Email required

Organization required

First Name required

Last Name required

Job Title required

Phone required (###) ###-####, or int ######...

City required

State/Province required

Tell us about your organization

error messages will go here...

Looks like we’re already familiar with you!

Please press next to continue with the survey.

Looks like we’re already familiar with you!

According to your account type you are not eligible to take surveys at this time. If this is a mistake, please contact KLAS.

If you are trying to access KLAS research data and reports, an email has been sent to   with a link to login.

If the email doesn't appear in your inbox, ask your IT department to add KLASresearch.com to your company spam filter's "whitelist", and check your email's spam folder.

Membership Commitment

In exchange for giving their feedback, healthcare providers can create an account to get access to industry reports, user commentary, and real-time ratings.

By submitting your account request, you are engaged in patient care as either an employee (or contractor) of your provider organization and that you confirm that you have reviewed and agree to abide by the Terms of Use for this website as updated periodically.

To learn more about how we process and protect your personal data, you may view our Privacy policy.

By submitting your account request, you confirm that you have reviewed and agree to abide by the Terms of Use for this website as updated periodically. To learn more about how we process and protect your personal data, you may view our Privacy policy.

By submitting your account request, you confirm that you have reviewed and agree to abide by the Terms of Use for this website as updated periodically.

To learn more about how we process and protect your personal data, you may view our Privacy policy.

 

To learn more about how we process and protect your personal data, you may view our Privacy policy.

 

To learn more about how we process and protect your personal data, you may view our Privacy policy.

Thank You! Your information was submitted successfully!

Next Steps - An email has been sent to . Please follow its instructions to verify your email, and login.

If the email doesn't appear in your inbox, try asking your IT department to add KLASresearch.com to your company spam filter's "whitelist", and checking your email's spam folder.

Thank You! Your information was submitted successfully!

Next Steps - A KLAS representative will contact you to discuss working with KLAS, typically within 24 to 48 hours.

If you have any further questions please contact info@klasresearch.com or 1-801-226-5120.

Surprise! Looks like we already have an account for you.

An email has been sent to blah@blah.com with a link to login.

If the email doesn't appear in your inbox, try asking your IT department to add KLASresearch.com to your company spam filter's "whitelist", and checking your email's spam folder.

Premium Reports
Subject Expert

Contact KLAS

info@klasresearch.com

801.226.5120

KLAS - Contact KLAS
 Download Report Brief  Download Full Report    Zoom in charts

Preferences

   Bookmark

Related Series

Laboratory Information Systems Performance/Perception
|
2008
Laboratory Information System (LIS) Report 2006
|
2006

 End chart zoom
Is it Time to Reevaluate My Lab Strategy?
* A page refresh may be necessary to see the updated image

Is it Time to Reevaluate My Lab Strategy?
Laboratory Vendor Market Update 2015

Authored by: Colin Buckley September 29, 2015 | Read Time: 2  minutes

Current Time Inside Cache Tag Helper: 7/29/2021 4:58:51 PM and Model.reportId = 1084

In mature HIT markets, radical innovation and clever marketing hold little sway. That means the battle between best-of-breed vendors (who want to hold on to customers) and enterprise vendors (who want to encourage migration) depends on the strength of the individual players. The determining factors can be evaluated in three key dimensions: product, service, and value. This report highlights vendor strengths and weaknesses and also explores the maturity of Epic Beaker in the laboratory market.

Healthcare Providers,
Want to see more reports?

Not a Provider, contact us for pricing details.

HtmlReportContent Current Time Inside Cache Tag Helper: 7/29/2021 4:58:51 PM and Model.reportId= 1084 and Model.HtmlReportContent_LastWriteTimeUtcInTicks=637508204935769736

1. ORCHARD AND SCC LEAD IN PERFORMANCE

Orchard Harvest LIS is the top performing lab solution in the small hospital space, while SCC fills that spot for large hospitals. Both vendors’ innovation and service improvements have set the gold standard for the laboratory market. As Beaker’s customer base has grown to include labs with more complex needs, higher expectations have led to a decline in overall customer satisfaction. Meanwhile, McKesson has seen a lot of attrition via departing Horizon customers, but those who remain are satisfied with a user-friendly product.

overall and trending over time

2. A TRADE-OFF: FUNCTIONALITY VS. SERVICE

Orchard and SCC are innovating and meeting many of their respective customer groups’ needs. While Cerner delivers a broad portfolio with advanced functionality, some providers mention the desire for more focused development on PathNet. Despite obvious gaps in functionality, Epic’s proactive service leads to strong performance ratings from IT personnel. MEDITECH customers complain of inexperienced staff and an inability to address problems, leading to low performance. Providers are nervous about Cerner NOVIUS and McKesson Lab, since the products’ lifespans are uncertain, but they report continuous good service and support.

Functionality vs Proactive Service

3. ORCHARD LEADS IN VALUE, AVOIDS SURPRISES

As the laboratory landscape continues to change and more providers migrate to their EMR vendor’s LIS, best-of-breed vendors are facing a challenge. Financial value is a large factor for most providers, and Orchard and SCC are praised for giving customers their money’s worth. Epic customers report lower value, especially lab personnel, who recognize that Beaker is not as mature as other Epic products. Cerner and Sunquest customers both tout robust functionality, though they express annoyance at nickel-and-diming practices.

Value vs Nick and Diming

4. BEAKER HAS IMPROVED BUT IS NOT READY FOR COMPLEX HOSPITALS

More Epic customers, including a few large IDNs, are starting to transition over to Beaker. For many, the integration improves their workflow, while regular updates and vendor guidance can compensate for the product’s immaturity. Small hospitals within IDNs are among the most vocal critics, as they have to adjust to a loss of flexibility in moving to a centralized LIS model. Large hospitals note weak anatomic pathology, the lack of a blood bank, and unpolished functionality. Though Beaker has steadily improved and providers are optimistic going forward, they expect a more mature product.

beaker vs previous lis

 Download Report Brief  Download Full Report

This material is copyrighted. Any organization gaining unauthorized access to this report will be liable to compensate KLAS for the full retail price. Please see the KLAS DATA USE POLICY for information regarding use of this report. © 2021 KLAS Research, LLC. All Rights Reserved. NOTE: Performance scores may change significantly when including newly interviewed provider organizations, especially when added to a smaller sample size like in emerging markets with a small number of live clients. The findings presented are not meant to be conclusive data for an entire client base.