All Categories chevron icon Imaging Systems chevron icon Imaging Software chevron icon Cardiology
2006 Best In KLAS Cardiology PACS Acute

2006 Best in KLAS Cardiology PACS (Acute)

Who is Best in KLAS?

See the latest BEST IN KLAS 2018

2025 Best in KLAS Awards - Global Software
2025 GLOBAL
2025 Best in KLAS Awards - Software and Services
2025 BEST IN KLAS

How do Cardiology PACS solutions compare?


Philips Logo
Calysto (Witt)
Konfidence
50
84.4
 
100
 

2

Fujifilm Logo
ProSolv Cardiovascular
82.6
 
 

3

ScImage Logo
PicomEnterprise
81.8
 
 

4

McKesson Logo
Horizon CPACS
79.5
 
 

5

Merative Logo
Emageon Vericis (Camtronics)
76.8
 
 

6

AGFA HealthCare Logo
Agfa Heartlab Encompass
76.3
 
 

7

Philips Logo
Xcelera
74.6
 
 

8

GE HealthCare Logo
GE Centricity CPACS
72.0
 
 

9

Siemens Healthineers Logo
Siemens KinetDx
69.7
 
 

10

OptiMed Logo
CPACS
61.3
 
Software 0.0
 

Past Cardiology PACS Awards

2025
Cardiology 2025 Cardiology
2024
Cardiology 2024 Cardiology
2023
Cardiology 2023 Cardiology
2022
Cardiology 2022 Cardiology
2021
Cardiology 2021 Cardiology
2020
Cardiology 2020 Cardiology
2019
Cardiology 2019 Cardiology
2018
Cardiology 2018 Cardiology
2017
Cardiology 2017 Cardiology
2015/2016
Cardiology 2016 Cardiology
2014
Cardiology 2014 Cardiology
2013
Cardiology 2013 Acute Care Acute Care
2012
Cardiology 2012 Acute Care Acute Care
2011
Cardiology 2011 Acute Care Acute Care
2010
Cardiology 2010 Acute Care Acute Care
2009
Cardiology 2009 Cardiology
2008
Cardiology 2008 Cardiology
2007
Cardiology PACS 2007 Acute Acute
2006
Cardiology PACS 2006 Acute Acute
2005
Cardiology PACS 2005 Cardiology PACS
Related ReportsView All Reports
Perception
KLAS article icon
Imaging AI 2024
27 November 24    |   Jonathan Christensen and Monique Rasband
The number of FDA-approved AI solutions for imaging has ballooned to over 300 in recent years, and during that time, adoption of various solution types (AI platforms, operational/reporting AI, and pixel AI) has also increased dramatically. Just over 50% of surveyed organizations are starting to use AI algorithms for at least one imaging use case—a significant jump from 2018, when 17% of interviewed organizations were piloting or live with an AI solution. To understand the prevalence of imaging AI adoption, this report draws from interviews with 206 US-based organizations (about 25% are imaging groups; remainder are health systems) and shares an early look at which solutions are most used and considered in this crowded market. Note that this report doesn’t explore customer satisfaction with AI solutions; KLAS intends to address this in future research. Note: This report focuses on AI used for diagnostic imaging, workflow triage, and other imaging-specific use cases. It does not cover general AI tools, including those used for ambient speech or voice recognition.
Performance
KLAS article icon
Epic Complete Look 2023
18 July 23    |   Paul Warburton and Tyson Blauer
When making a core HIT purchasing decision, healthcare organizations must take into account how prospective partners deliver across a variety of key technology areas. This Epic “complete look” provides a high-level analysis of the key products that make up Epic’s enterprise suite. (Other reports in the series do the same for Altera Digital Health [Allscripts] , Evident , MEDITECH , and Oracle Health [Cerner] .)
Perception
KLAS article icon
Optum/Change Healthcare Merger
16 August 22    |   Boyd Stewart and Sam Eaquinto
In January 2021, Optum announced their intentions to acquire Change Healthcare. The merger remains unfinalized, however, as the US Department of Justice blocked the deal in February 2022 due to anticompetition concerns—such a merger would give UnitedHealth Group, Optum’s parent company and the nation’s largest insurer, access to rivals’ sensitive data. The legal proceeding is ongoing and scheduled to go to trial August 1, 2022. This report shares Optum and Change Healthcare customers’ reactions to the merger and their perceptions of its impact. Between March 2021 and April 2022, KLAS interviewed 48 individuals from 46 unique organizations; of these respondents, 9% are Optum customers, 56% are Change Healthcare customers, and 35% are customers of both vendors.

Konfidence

Konfidence level
Konfidence Level Description
Products must have at least 30 live organizations participating for software and at least 15 live organizations for professional services. Exception to this is Transcription Services (30).
Products must have at least 20 live organizations participating for software and at least 10 live organizations for professional services. Exception to this is Transcription Services (20).
Products must have at least 15 live organizations participating for software and at least 6 live organizations for professional services. Exception to this is Transcription Services
-
The Konfidence level on this product rating is low. These results are for early trend detection. As more performance data is received, the result is likely to have a wide variance.
We use cookies! We use essential and basic aggregated, depersonalized Google Analytics cookies to provide the type of content which our visitors are most interested in.  Cookie Policy    
​