Home chevron icon Imaging Systems chevron icon Imaging Software chevron icon Cardiology
2013 Best In KLAS Cardiology Acute Care

2013 Best in KLAS Cardiology (Acute Care)

Who is Best in KLAS?

See the latest BEST IN KLAS 2018

2024 Best in KLAS Awards - Global Software
2024 GLOBAL
2024 Best in KLAS Awards - Software and Services
2024 BEST IN KLAS

How do Cardiology solutions compare?


Merative Logo
Merge Healthcare Cardio
Konfidence
Average for Cardiology75.3
40
 
100
 

2

Intelerad Logo
Digisonics DigiView
 
 

3

Siemens Healthineers Logo
Siemens syngo Dynamics
 
 

4

McKesson Logo
Cardiology
 
 

5

Intelerad Logo
LUMEDX Apollo Advance
 
 

6

Philips Logo
Xcelera
 
 

7

Fujifilm Logo
FUJIFILM Synapse cardiovascular
 
 

8

GE HealthCare Logo
GE Healthcare Centricity Cardiology DMS
 
 

9

AGFA HealthCare Logo
Agfa HealthCare IMPAX Cardiovascular
 
Software 0.0
 

How do the top three solutions trend?


Merative-Merge Healthcare Cardio
Intelerad-Digisonics DigiView
Siemens Healthineers-Siemens syngo Dynamics

Past Cardiology Awards

2024
Cardiology 2024 Cardiology
2023
Cardiology 2023 Cardiology
2022
Cardiology 2022 Cardiology
2021
Cardiology 2021 Cardiology
2020
Cardiology 2020 Cardiology
2019
Cardiology 2019 Cardiology
2018
Cardiology 2018 Cardiology
2017
Cardiology 2017 Cardiology
2015/2016
Cardiology 2016 Cardiology
2014
Cardiology 2014 Cardiology
2013
Cardiology 2013 Acute Care Acute Care
2012
Cardiology 2012 Acute Care Acute Care
2011
Cardiology 2011 Acute Care Acute Care
2010
Cardiology 2010 Acute Care Acute Care
2009
Cardiology 2009 Cardiology
2008
Cardiology 2008 Cardiology
2007
Cardiology PACS 2007 Acute Acute
2006
Cardiology PACS 2006 Acute Acute
2005
Cardiology PACS 2005 Cardiology PACS
Related ReportsView All Reports
Performance
KLAS article icon
Cardiology 2022
23 August 22    |   Monique Rasband and Sidney Tate
Healthcare organizations have steadily invested in cardiology solutions despite the COVID-19 pandemic, and structured reporting continues to be top of mind in their search for a vendor to unify cardiology modalities and imaging overall. Over 25% of the 183 interviewed organizations are actively planning to replace their current vendor or would do so if given the option, leading to a dynamic, volatile market where no one vendor consistently leads in customer satisfaction. This report (1) examines the breadth of customer-reported structured reporting adoption and customer satisfaction to help organizations determine which vendors can best meet their needs and (2) provides an update on customer satisfaction with hemodynamics solutions. Note: For this report, a respondent organization had to be live with structured reporting in at least one module for their perspective to be included.
Perception
KLAS article icon
Optum/Change Healthcare Merger
16 August 22    |   Boyd Stewart and Sam Eaquinto
In January 2021, Optum announced their intentions to acquire Change Healthcare. The merger remains unfinalized, however, as the US Department of Justice blocked the deal in February 2022 due to anticompetition concerns—such a merger would give UnitedHealth Group, Optum’s parent company and the nation’s largest insurer, access to rivals’ sensitive data. The legal proceeding is ongoing and scheduled to go to trial August 1, 2022. This report shares Optum and Change Healthcare customers’ reactions to the merger and their perceptions of its impact. Between March 2021 and April 2022, KLAS interviewed 48 individuals from 46 unique organizations; of these respondents, 9% are Optum customers, 56% are Change Healthcare customers, and 35% are customers of both vendors.
Decision Insights
KLAS article icon
Cardiology 2021
14 July 21    |   Doug Tolley, Monique Rasband and Sam Eaquinto
While enterprise imaging (EI) is on healthcare organizations’ minds, many currently use multiple vendors for different imaging needs. For cardiology in particular, organizations frequently must piece together multiple systems to meet their structured reporting needs. Today, a number of organizations are replacing their legacy cardiology solutions and/or evaluating cardiology in the context of their long-term EI strategy (including structured reporting in the CVIS). No cardiology offering stands out with great customer satisfaction—each of the last three years has seen a different vendor win Best in KLAS for cardiology. This report examines 38 recent cardiology purchase decisions and the factors driving these decisions.

Konfidence

Konfidence level
Konfidence Level Description
Products must have at least 30 live organizations participating for software and at least 15 live organizations for professional services. Exception to this is Transcription Services (30).
Products must have at least 20 live organizations participating for software and at least 10 live organizations for professional services. Exception to this is Transcription Services (20).
Products must have at least 15 live organizations participating for software and at least 6 live organizations for professional services. Exception to this is Transcription Services
-
The Konfidence level on this product rating is low. These results are for early trend detection. As more performance data is received, the result is likely to have a wide variance.
We use cookies! We use essential and basic aggregated, depersonalized Google Analytics cookies to provide the type of content which our visitors are most interested in.  Cookie Policy    
​