How do Clinical Implementation Principal solutions compare?
Perot Systems [Cerner, Meditech and Various]
Konfidence
Average for Clinical Implementation Principal79.1
50
Perot Systems [Cerner, Meditech and Various]
100
2
[Epic Only]
[Epic Only]
3
Consulting [Epic and Various]
Consulting [Epic and Various]
4
ACS [McKesson, Meditech, and Various]
ACS [McKesson, Meditech, and Various]
5
Cerner [Cerner Only]
Cerner [Cerner Only]
6
Siemens [Siemens Only]
Siemens [Siemens Only]
7
[McKesson Only]
[McKesson Only]
8
Eclipsys [Eclipsys Only]
Eclipsys [Eclipsys Only]
9
CSC (FCG) [Cerner, Eclipsys, Epic and Meditech]
CSC (FCG) [Cerner, Eclipsys, Epic and Meditech]
10
[Cerner, Eclipsys, Epic, Meditech and Various]
[Cerner, Eclipsys, Epic, Meditech and Various]
Professional Services 0.0
Past Clinical Implementation Principal Awards
Konfidence
Konfidence level
Konfidence Level Description
Products must have at least 30 live organizations participating for software and at least 15 live organizations for professional services. Exception to this is Transcription Services (30).
Products must have at least 20 live organizations participating for software and at least 10 live organizations for professional services. Exception to this is Transcription Services (20).
Products must have at least 15 live organizations participating for software and at least 6 live organizations for professional services. Exception to this is Transcription Services
-
The Konfidence level on this product rating is low. These results are for early trend detection. As more performance data is received, the result is likely to have a wide variance.
We use cookies! We use essential and basic aggregated, depersonalized Google Analytics cookies to provide the type of content which our visitors are most interested in. Cookie Policy
​