Who is Best in KLAS?

See the latest BEST IN KLAS 2018

2025 Best in KLAS Awards - Global Software
2025 GLOBAL
2025 Best in KLAS Awards - Software and Services
2025 BEST IN KLAS

How do IT Advisory Services solutions compare?


Impact Advisors Logo
Impact Advisors
Konfidence
Average for IT Advisory Services91.5
50
96.6
 
100
 

2

MedSys Group Logo
MedSys Group
96.2
 
 

3

Tegria Logo
Navin, Haffty & Associates (NHA)
94.7
 
 

4

Tegria Logo
Cumberland
92.1
 
 

5

Chartis Logo
Group (Aspen Advisors)
91.5
 
 

5

PwC Logo
PwC
91.5
 
 

7

Nordic Logo
Consulting
90.4
 
 

8

ECG Management Consultants Logo
Kurt Salmon
90.0
 
 

9

Computer Task Group, Incorporated, a Cegeka Company Logo
CTG
88.7
 
 

10

Emids Logo
Encore
88.6
 
 

11

ECG Management Consultants Logo
ECG Management Consultants
88.4
 
 

12

Deloitte Logo
Consulting
86.7
 
 

13

Accenture Logo
Sagacious Consultants
86.6
 
 

14

Jacobus Consulting Logo
Jacobus
86.3
 
 

15

Hayes Management Consulting, LLC Logo
Hayes Management Consulting
85.3
 
 

16

Accenture Logo
Health
82.9
 
 

17

Experis Health Solutions Logo
Leidos Health
81.0
 
 

18

Oracle Health Logo
Cerner
79.4
 
 

19

Healthcare Triangle Logo
Cornerstone Advisors
78.5
 
 

20

Oracle Health Logo
Cerner (Siemens)
67.3
 
Professional Services 87.9
 

How do the top three solutions trend?



Past IT Advisory Services Awards

Konfidence

Konfidence level
Konfidence Level Description
Products must have at least 30 live organizations participating for software and at least 15 live organizations for professional services. Exception to this is Transcription Services (30).
Products must have at least 20 live organizations participating for software and at least 10 live organizations for professional services. Exception to this is Transcription Services (20).
Products must have at least 15 live organizations participating for software and at least 6 live organizations for professional services. Exception to this is Transcription Services
-
The Konfidence level on this product rating is low. These results are for early trend detection. As more performance data is received, the result is likely to have a wide variance.