Preferences
Related Series
Related Segments
Interactive Patient Systems 2017
Turning Interactivity into Outcomes
Interactive patient systems (IPS) represent a major investment compared to the televisions and video players they replace. Fortunately, IPS solutions have been largely successful in meeting two key needs: educating and entertaining patients. But that is just the beginning of what IPS solutions can do, say vendors. Expanded capabilities—such as EMR integration, real-time patient communication, and additional entertainment options—promise to further improve patients’ experiences and engagement. This report examines which IPS vendors most consistently deliver on their customers’ expected outcomes.
1. TVR Communications Leads Performance; Early Epic Users Also Pleased
TVR Communications outperforms the average IPS vendor in all areas of sales, support, and technology. The limited sample of Epic customers are similarly satisfied. Customers of either vendor are pleased with outcomes, despite neither having the most comprehensive capabilities. Customers of GetWellNetwork and SONIFI Health have deeper functionalities and thus higher expectations; some report inconsistent follow-through (GetWellNetwork) and a need for more proactive service (SONIFI). Some TeleHealth Services customers and a small sample of Allen Technologies users say their IPS platforms are outdated and that outcomes are constrained by a lack of advanced functionality. Cerner is the only vendor whose customers scored performance below an 80. The limited group of early Cerner adopters say development is incomplete.
2. Cerner and Epic Displacing Few Best-of-Breed Vendors
In other market segments, providers have historically fled best-of-breed vendors for hospital solutions that fully integrate with their core EMR. So far, IPS seems to be the exception as Cerner and Epic EMR customers have declined to leave their best-of-breed IPS solution in favor of the IPS solution from their EMR vendor. Cerner EMR customers say integration gives CareAware MyStation some cost advantages, but nearly two-thirds say the product’s maturity and functionality do not yet justify migrating. About two-thirds of Epic EMR customers say they are planning or considering a MyChart Bedside implementation. The product’s EMR integration successfully delivers patient-portal-like capabilities to hospital patient rooms. Some say MyChart Bedside is unlikely to displace their current IPS solution because it lacks key IPS functionality, including entertainment options.
3. GetWellNetwork Customers Report High Expectations for Functionality Despite Uneven Delivery
Most providers say their IPS vendor delivers a quality product, but many report a lack of the advanced capabilities that produce the most meaningful outcomes. Market-share leader GetWellNetwork offers a broader functional portfolio, though some customers say usability falls short. As GetWellNetwork customers adopt advanced capabilities, like real-time patient communication, their expectations grow for better reporting analytics. TVR Communications consistently delivers the education functionality their customers value most. Across all vendors, providers most often say that a lack of EMR integration is the single largest barrier to achieving more meaningful outcomes.
Fully Rated Vendors
GetWellNetwork
Primary Outcomes/Benefits
Real-time patient communication tools lead to high patient satisfaction.
Common Solution Gaps
EMR integration unrealized for some. More flexible reporting tools would help measure and manage outcomes.
Bottom Line
An industry leader in mindshare and marketshare. Visionary in pursuit of larger cross-continuum patient engagement goals, which involve their acquisitions of Seamless Medical Systems, Marbella, and Skylight. Some inconsistent deployment of capabilities among customers.
SONIFI Health
Primary Outcomes/Benefits
Strong education delivery; praised for entertainment capabilities as well.
Common Solution Gaps
EMR integration still needed by some providers. Challenges, such as cost, prevent some from optimizing capabilities and user adoption.
Bottom Line
Expanded from roots in hospitality with tools for managing overall patient experience. Can be less proactive in helping providers optimize value. Some say technology is dated. Seven of twenty-six interviewed organizations are considering other options.
TeleHealth Services
Primary Outcomes/Benefits
Achieves patient education goals, including quality measure targets for education and patient satisfaction.
Common Solution Gaps
Customers using older versions say technology is outdated and difficult to use.
Bottom Line
Simpler technology, good support, lower cost. Customers seek more meaningful outcomes via upgrades or by switching vendors.
TVR Communications
Primary Outcomes/Benefits
Patients benefit most from education delivery. Entertainment features boost patient satisfaction.
Common Solution Gaps
Some customers are catching up with EMR integration. Cost of upgrading old TVs a challenge.
Bottom Line
2017 KLAS Category Leader. Consistently high ratings in all areas of sales, product, and service. A leader at meeting core IPS needs. Customers mostly in the Northeast.
Below Konfidence Vendors
Allen Technologies
Primary Outcomes/Benefits
Education and entertainment features lead to greater patient satisfaction.
Common Solution Gaps
Some praise the product quality, while others claim realiability issues caused by outdated technology.
Bottom Line
A supportive, sometimes reactive vendor. Technology issues limit outcomes for some. Many customers are standalone hospitals.
Cerner
Primary Outcomes/Benefits
EMR integration improves clinical efficiency. Patients benefit from access to medical records.
Common Solution Gaps
Platform still maturing. Customers waiting for holes to be filled.
Bottom Line
Integrated IPS for Cerner customers shows promise, but migrations are on hold as development continues.
Epic
Primary Outcomes/Benefits
Access to EMR data augments educational content.
Common Solution Gaps
Complexity of tablet interface presents usability challenges for some. Sterility concerns with tablets.
Bottom Line
Epic customers pleased with additional capability, but system is not a full IPS replacement. Most Epic customers are planning or considering rollouts.
Other Validated Vendor
Oneview Healthcare
Bottom Line
Early positive feedback focuses on education and innovative technology, including interactive touchscreens. Smaller US customer base.
Designer
Jess Wallace-Simpson
Project Manager
Robert Ellis
This material is copyrighted. Any organization gaining unauthorized access to this report will be liable to compensate KLAS for the full retail price. Please see the KLAS DATA USE POLICY for information regarding use of this report. © 2024 KLAS Research, LLC. All Rights Reserved. NOTE: Performance scores may change significantly when including newly interviewed provider organizations, especially when added to a smaller sample size like in emerging markets with a small number of live clients. The findings presented are not meant to be conclusive data for an entire client base.