PACS Aurora (Global) (Mostly Brazil) Commentary
Filtered view: (Latin America)
If you don't have a login, getting started is easy.
User Commentary
The business area is inclined to go with another vendor's solution so that everything is within that...
The PACS Aurora tool is good. There's an imaging aspect where I hear some complaints. The doctors...
Whenever Pixeon's team identifies something, they will always notify us proactively. When there is...
Pixeon doesn't avoid charging for every little thing. Even when we request an internal configuration...
Pixeon has always maintained a solid relationship with us. They meet our needs properly. Their...
The product itself is fine, but users sometimes struggle. Physicians or patients don’t always notice...
Pixeon’s PACS includes post-processing and AI features for specific areas, and that shows that the...
The PACS needs to connect with mainly HIS products. We are currently developing a new integration. I...
The system has been running smoothly. We have added more modalities to the PACS, and it has been...
If I were making the product decision again, I would study the decision more carefully. Our...
Having AI within PACS Aurora could help with diagnostics. Imagine a radiologist reviewing 100 images...
I would definitely look into other PACS products if I were looking because there are some things I...
I have very smooth access to PACS Aurora. Inside the hospital, outside, or wherever I am, I don’t...
Commentary Summary
Comment Type Breakout