Premium Reports
Contact KLAS
 Download Report Brief  Download Full Report    Zoom in charts

Preferences

   Bookmark

Related Series

EMR Technology Perception 2013
|
2013
CIS Perception 2010
|
2010
Physicians, Nurses, and EMR Adoption
|
2009

Related Segments

Related Products

Related Vendors

 End chart zoom
CIS Perception CIS Perception
* A page refresh may be necessary to see the updated image

CIS Perception
Changes in Momentum 2008 (A KLAS Perception Study)

August 15, 2008

Current Time Inside Cache Tag Helper: 5/21/2022 12:26:10 AM and Model.reportId = 458

This is KLAS’ 5th Clinical Information Systems (CIS) Perception Study, a study that included 164 provider interviews from 157 unique organizations. Information gathered here is at times compared to either clinical market share data (1,473 survey pool of hospitals 200 beds or greater) or CPOE data (303 provider interviews) obtained earlier this year.

HtmlReportContent Current Time Inside Cache Tag Helper: 5/21/2022 12:26:10 AM and Model.reportId= 458 and Model.HtmlReportContent_LastWriteTimeUtcInTicks=637406508354492627

KLAS began monitoring the CIS market in 2001. Follow-up studies were conducted in 2003, 2004, and 2006 and now in 2008. In 2001 41% had no CIS solution. By 2003 we had a new market entrant GE, a different strategy with Pyxis Visual Med and the hype of CPOE.

Vendors qualifying for ranking in the study were Cerner, Eclipsys, Epic, GE, McKesson, Meditech, QuadraMed, and Siemens.

Perception studies focus on provider perceptions rather than actual performance scores in the marketplace.

Access more information about the Clinical Information System research, or preview the report sample above.

 Download Report Brief  Download Full Report

This material is copyrighted. Any organization gaining unauthorized access to this report will be liable to compensate KLAS for the full retail price. Please see the KLAS DATA USE POLICY for information regarding use of this report. © 2022 KLAS Research, LLC. All Rights Reserved. NOTE: Performance scores may change significantly when including newly interviewed provider organizations, especially when added to a smaller sample size like in emerging markets with a small number of live clients. The findings presented are not meant to be conclusive data for an entire client base.