KLAS Contact
Contact KLAS
Contact KLAS
2024 BEST IN KLAS
Preferences
Related Series
2022
2020
2018
2017
2015
2013
2012
2011
2011
2010
2009
2008
2008
2008
2007
2007
2006
2006
2006
2005
2005
Related Segments
PACS - Community Hospital Report 2005
KLAS' 2005 Community Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) report looks specifically at hospitals with 200 beds or less. The report provides a snapshot of today’s community hospital PACS vendors (200 beds or less) and compares their strengths and weaknesses against one another, all community hospital PACS vendors and the KLAS HIT average (the average of all healthcare information technology products in the KLAS database).
This report features a total of 20 vendors. Eight community hospital PACS vendor products are compared in the main body of the report: DR Systems Dominator, Fuji Synapse, GE Centricity PACS v.2.0, McKesson Horizon Medical Imaging, Merge eMed Matrix, NovaRad PACS, Philips EasyAccess, and Philips iSite (Stentor).
An Early Data section features vendors whose products have not yet met KLAS' minimum confidence level in order to be compared with the vendors in the main body of the report. These vendors include: Agfa Impax, AMICAS Vision Series, BRIT Systems, Dynamic Imaging IntegradWeb, Intelerad IntelePACS, Kodak DirectView, RamSoft PowerServer, RAYPAX, ScImage PicomEnterprise, Siemens SIENET, and SmartPACS.
An Addendum contains one vendor, ITL for which KLAS has no data, however, a vendor overview was provided.
Project Manager
Robert Ellis
This material is copyrighted. Any organization gaining unauthorized access to this report will be liable to compensate KLAS for the full retail price. Please see the KLAS DATA USE POLICY for information regarding use of this report. © 2024 KLAS Research, LLC. All Rights Reserved. NOTE: Performance scores may change significantly when including newly interviewed provider organizations, especially when added to a smaller sample size like in emerging markets with a small number of live clients. The findings presented are not meant to be conclusive data for an entire client base.