Thank you !

Access info about PACS on your dashboard or bookmark under

(Your Products / Your Organization's Products)

We are currently researching PACS.

Will you help us?

Take A Survey

Premium Reports
 Download Report Brief  Download Full Report    Zoom in charts

Preferences

   Bookmark

Related Series

PACS 2020
|
2020
PACS 2018
|
2018
PACS 2017
|
2017
PACS 2015
|
2015
PACS Technology 2013
|
2013
Community and Ambulatory PACS 2012
|
2012
PACS 2011
|
2011
Ambulatory RIS/PACS
|
2011
A Read on PACS
|
2010
The New PACS Market
|
2009
Ambulatory PACS 2008
|
2008
Community Hospital PACS 2008
|
2008
PACS - Acute Care 2008
|
2008
Ambulatory PACS 2007
|
2007
Community Hospital PACS 2007
|
2007
Ambulatory PACS 2006
|
2006
Acute Care PACS 2006
|
2006
PACS - Ambulatory/Imaging Center Report 2005
|
2005
PACS - Community Hospital Report 2005
|
2005
PACS - Acute Care Large Study 2005
|
2005

Related Segments

Related Products

Related Vendors

 End chart zoom
Community PACS 2006 Community PACS 2006
* A page refresh may be necessary to see the updated image

Community PACS 2006

November 3, 2006

Current Time Inside Cache Tag Helper: 10/27/2021 3:41:01 AM and Model.reportId = 390

KLAS' Community PACS 2006 report studies vendor performance among community PACS offerings. The report answers questions such as "Which vendor performs best, according to providers in community hospital settings?" and "What advice do providers offer to those researching a community PACS solution?"

Thank you !

Access info about PACS on your dashboard or bookmark under

(Your Products / Your Organization's Products)

We are currently researching PACS.

Will you help us?

Take A Survey

HtmlReportContent Current Time Inside Cache Tag Helper: 10/27/2021 3:41:01 AM and Model.reportId= 390 and Model.HtmlReportContent_LastWriteTimeUtcInTicks=637406508389749086

Select Findings of Interest

  • There has been a meaningful increase in positive commentary (60 percent to 69 percent, 2005 to 2006) against a KLAS all product average increase of 61 percent to 62 percent.
  • Negative commentary shows many of the issues are the same from 2005 to 2006 and are related to service, support, documentation and training.
  • More studies were done through PACS; the overwhelming majority report 85 percent or more of all studies done through PACS, which is a solid 10 percent increase from that reported in 2005.

Vendors Included in the Report

This report includes a total of 27 products from 27 vendors. Vendor products with greater than 15 unique organizations included in the research qualify for the Main Body. Those with more than six but less than 15 unique organizations included in the research qualify for the Early Data section. Specific to the 2006 Community PACS report there are 11 products that qualify to be in the Main Body of the report, 12 that qualify for the Early Data section, and four products that have Vendor Overviews and Technical Assessments only.

The 11 vendors/products that qualified to be included in the Main Body of the report are: Agfa IMPAX, AMICAS Vision Series PACS, BRIT PACS, DR Systems Dominator, Fuji Synapse, GE Centricity PACS v. 2.0, Infinitt SmartPACS, McKesson Horizon Medical Imaging, Merge eMed FUSION Matrix PACS, NovaRad NovaPACS, Philips iSite (Stentor).

Benefit from the experience of 405 providers in this 518-page report.

 Download Report Brief  Download Full Report

This material is copyrighted. Any organization gaining unauthorized access to this report will be liable to compensate KLAS for the full retail price. Please see the KLAS DATA USE POLICY for information regarding use of this report. © 2021 KLAS Research, LLC. All Rights Reserved. NOTE: Performance scores may change significantly when including newly interviewed provider organizations, especially when added to a smaller sample size like in emerging markets with a small number of live clients. The findings presented are not meant to be conclusive data for an entire client base.