Preferences
Related Series
Related Segments


CDS Point of Care Reference 2021
Cost Pressures & Competitive Options Top of Mind
Current Time Inside Cache Tag Helper: 6/8/2023 6:26:51 AM and Model.reportId = 1834
Healthcare organizations typically use multiple clinical point-of-care reference systems to satisfy different users and address various use cases. But COVID-19 cost pressures, recent system updates, and the desire to standardize care have prompted organizations to reevaluate existing solutions and their CDS strategy. To help organizations navigate their options, this report seeks to illuminate the pros and cons of established clinical point-of-care solutions; it also provides an early look at the recent collaboration between EBSCO Information Services and IBM Watson Health.if you don't have a login, getting started is easy.
Key Findings:
- Strong Physician Preference for Wolters Kluwer Juxtaposed with Concerns about Cost
- EBSCO Content Drives Outcomes; Elsevier's Deep Content Difficult to Access at Point of Care
- New-to-Market EBSCO & IBM Offering Has Early Appeal; Support Structure Needs Clarity
- Elsevier & IBM Perceived as Slow with New Content Delivery; Wolters Kluwer Interface Seen as Outdated
- Unresponsive Support a Concern for Some IBM Customers; EBSCO Stands Out for Strong Relationships
- Solution Snapshots

Writer
Sarah Hanson

Designer
Madison Moniz

Project Manager
Natalie Jamison
This material is copyrighted. Any organization gaining unauthorized access to this report will be liable to compensate KLAS for the full retail price. Please see the KLAS DATA USE POLICY for information regarding use of this report. © 2023 KLAS Research, LLC. All Rights Reserved. NOTE: Performance scores may change significantly when including newly interviewed provider organizations, especially when added to a smaller sample size like in emerging markets with a small number of live clients. The findings presented are not meant to be conclusive data for an entire client base.