Premium Reports
Enterprise Scheduling 2007 Market Review

Enterprise Scheduling 2007 Market Review

April 20, 2007

Current Time Inside Cache Tag Helper: 10/28/2020 11:27:16 PM and Model.reportId = 441

Implementing Enterprise Scheduling is a significant project. It requires workflow redesign and interaction with registration and ADT, revenue cycle intake, clinical treatment planning, order entry, and case management. As an application, it presents one of the most complex interface and integration planning challenges and ongoing maintenance that is daunting. These applications are expensive to design, develop, test, and deliver for the vendors and are similarly a large investment on the part of the healthcare providers to select, implement, test, train, and maintain.

Healthcare Providers,
Want to see more reports?

Not a Provider, contact us for pricing details.

HtmlReportContent Current Time Inside Cache Tag Helper: 10/28/2020 11:27:16 PM and Model.reportId= 441 and Model.HtmlReportContent_LastWriteTimeUtcInTicks=636106015869041066

This report includes a total of 10 products from 10 vendors. There are six products that qualify to be in the Main Body of the report and four that qualify for the Early Data section:

Main Body vendors (research collected includes at least 15 unique organizations) include:

  • Cerner Scheduling Management
  • Epic Cadence Scheduling
  • McKesson Pathways Healthcare Scheduling v.8-10
  • QuadraMed Tempus TempusOne
  • SCI Solutions Schedule Maximizer

Early data vendors (research collected includes at least six unique organizations) include:

  • CQI Care Tracker – Enterprise
  • Per-Se One-Call
  • Siemens Soarian Scheduling
  • StatSchedules StratScheduler

 Download Report Brief  Download Full Report

This material is copyrighted. Any organization gaining unauthorized access to this report will be liable to compensate KLAS for the full retail price. Please see the KLAS DATA USE POLICY for information regarding use of this report. © 2020 KLAS Research, LLC. All Rights Reserved. NOTE: Performance scores may change significantly when including newly interviewed provider organizations, especially when added to a smaller sample size like in emerging markets with a small number of live clients. The findings presented are not meant to be conclusive data for an entire client base.