Step 1 of
Step 2 of
Step 3 of
Step 17 of
All Categories chevron icon Ambulatory & Post-Acute Care chevron icon Physician Practice Solutions chevron icon Patient Intake Management

Phreesia

Subject Expert
Trey Dye
Research Director
KLAS Research Director - Trey Dye
 
Step 16 of
  Read User Comments
Step 15 of
 Compare Products
View Advanced Filters
Step 14 of

Trending Filters

By Years
1
2
3

Featured  Reports

Patient Self-Scheduling 2024: An Early Look at Standalone Solutions
Patient Self-Scheduling 2024:
An Early Look at Standalone Solutions
March 2024
View Report
Patient Intake Management 2024: Where Are Vendors Delivering Value?
View Report
Patient Engagement Ecosystem 2023: An Update on Vendor-Reported Capabilities
View Report

Preferences

Add Bookmark   Bookmark

Does this page look different?
Get a summary of what's new.
Get a tour.



Overall Score    Filtered view: ##.#   Segment Average ##.#

Average for Patient Intake Management ##.#
50
##.#
 
100
Software Average for KLAS Rated Products ##.#

Single Physician

The product does not have 15 surveys from facilities with 2-10 physicians, but has at least 15 when including surveys from single physician facilities.

Component

Solution that typically includes most but not all components that comprise a complete system or that serves only a subset of the market.

Limited market share

This solution does not have a sufficient number of live customers to qualify for a Best in KLAS ranking.

Not primary

Solution is not the vendor’s lead product in the category but may still be purchased.

Regional

Solution for which the majority of data comes from organizations located in the same, small geographical area.

Superseded

Legacy solutions or other solutions that are not generally marketed or whose marketing is superseded by another solution in the same category.

Emerging technology

Solution is new/emerging and has yet to meet standard data level qualifications. Designation will be removed once solution meets the qualifications.

Market Energy

This is an indication of the relative considerations of Market Energy within the shown products from the

Decision Insights KLAS Data

Market Energy Levels:

Low Market Energy
Medium Market Energy
High Market Energy
Not Enough Data

Org Sample Size

  • n = total survey sample size
  • u = # of unique organizations surveyed
Step 4 of
Step 5 of

Overall Score Trending (1 Year) Filtered view:

to see the full dataset.

If you don't have a login, getting started is easy.

Provider Organizations
Fill out our registration form to verify your organization.
HIT Companies
Contact a KLAS representative for plans and pricing.
Step 6 of

Latest Comments    See all (138) comments Filtered view: ##.#% ##.#% ##.#%  Download as Excel

Step 7 of
Step 8 of

Score Breakdown (1 Year)    Filtered view:

  Culture
Segment avg. ##.#
Segment avg. ##.#
##.#
 
 
Software avg. ##.#
Click for full details
Keeps ALL promises (Yes|No)
Segment avg. ##.#
Segment avg. ##.#
##%
 
Software avg. ##.#
Product works as promoted (1-9)
Segment avg. ##.#
Segment avg. ##.#
##.#
 
Software avg. ##.#
Proactive service (1-9)
Segment avg. ##.#
Segment avg. ##.#
##.#
 
Software avg. ##.#
  Loyalty
Segment avg. ##.#
Segment avg. ##.#
##.#
 
 
Software avg. ##.#
Part of long-term plans (Yes|No)
Segment avg. ##.#
Segment avg. ##.#
##%
 
Software avg. ##.#
Would you buy again (Yes|No)
Segment avg. ##.#
Segment avg. ##.#
##%
 
Software avg. ##.#
Likely to recommend (1-9)
Segment avg. ##.#
Segment avg. ##.#
##.#
 
Software avg. ##.#
Overall satisfaction (1-9)
Segment avg. ##.#
Segment avg. ##.#
##.#
 
Software avg. ##.#
Forecasted overall satisfaction (1-9)
Segment avg. ##.#
Segment avg. ##.#
##.#
 
Software avg. ##.#
  Operations
Segment avg. ##.#
Segment avg. ##.#
##.#
 
 
Software avg. ##.#
Quality of implementation (1-9)
Segment avg. ##.#
Segment avg. ##.#
##.#
 
Software avg. ##.#
Quality of training (1-9)
Segment avg. ##.#
Segment avg. ##.#
##.#
 
Software avg. ##.#
Ease of use (1-9)
Segment avg. ##.#
Segment avg. ##.#
##.#
 
Software avg. ##.#
  Product
Segment avg. ##.#
Segment avg. ##.#
##.#
 
 
Software avg. ##.#
Supports integration goals (1-9)
Segment avg. ##.#
Segment avg. ##.#
##.#
 
Software avg. ##.#
Overall product quality (1-9)
Segment avg. ##.#
Segment avg. ##.#
##.#
 
Software avg. ##.#
Product has needed functionality (1-9)
Segment avg. ##.#
Segment avg. ##.#
##.#
 
Software avg. ##.#
Delivery of new technology (1-9)
Segment avg. ##.#
Segment avg. ##.#
##.#
 
Software avg. ##.#
  Relationship
Segment avg. ##.#
Segment avg. ##.#
##.#
 
 
Software avg. ##.#
Quality of support (1-9)
Segment avg. ##.#
Segment avg. ##.#
##.#
 
Software avg. ##.#
Vendor executive involvement (1-9)
Segment avg. ##.#
Segment avg. ##.#
##.#
 
Software avg. ##.#
  Value
Segment avg. ##.#
Segment avg. ##.#
##.#
 
 
Software avg. ##.#
Avoids charging for every little thing (Yes|No)
Segment avg. ##.#
Segment avg. ##.#
##%
 
Software avg. ##.#
Drives Tangible Outcomes (1-9)
Segment avg. ##.#
Segment avg. ##.#
##.#
 
Software avg. ##.#
Money’s worth (1-9)
Segment avg. ##.#
Segment avg. ##.#
##.#
 
Software avg. ##.#
Step 9 of
Step 10 of
Step 11 of
Score Distribution
 
 
 Mean
9
##.#%
8
##.#%
7
##.#%
6
##.#%
5
##.#%
4
##.#%
3
##.#%
2
##.#%
1
##.#%
Facility Type
 
 
Standalone Facilities
Multi-site Facilities
90%
10%

Step 12 of
Step 13 of
 Download as Excel  Print / Save as PDF
View All Reports
Related Reports
Performance
KLAS article icon
Patient Intake Management 2024
16 February 24    |   Adam Cherrington and Spencer Snyder
Consumerism and patient-centric tools are an increasing focus in healthcare— previous KLAS research validated that patients’ top priority for patient engagement technology is the ability to schedule appointments and check in online. Patient intake management solutions offer such capabilities, among others, and can help improve patient engagement and satisfaction. These solutions experienced exponential growth during the COVID-19 pandemic , and they continue to be important as healthcare organizations work toward increased efficiency and cost savings. While all measured vendors have room to improve functionality (e.g., two-way patient texting, patient satisfaction surveys), this report validates the breadth and depth of patient intake management solutions, identifies the outcomes these solutions drive, and examines the respective merits of third-party and EHR solutions.
Performance
KLAS article icon
Patient Engagement Ecosystem 2023
13 July 23    |   Adam Cherrington and Dan Czech
Amid the pressures of today’s economic environment, healthcare organizations are investing heavily in patient engagement technology to help reduce costs, alleviate staffing challenges, and consolidate technology in other areas. Both provider and payer organizations seek to understand what patient engagement capabilities vendors offer that can meet their core needs. This study (along with additional deep-dive content that will be published on KLAS’ website) is an update to KLAS’ 2021 report and shows which vendors report the broadest capability sets, which vendors have made the most progress over the last two years, and how the industry as a whole has matured. For reader ease, links to relevant online content are provided where applicable. Note that the data in this study is based primarily on vendor-reported information, accompanied by a limited amount of KLAS performance data.
,
We use cookies! We use essential and basic aggregated, depersonalized Google Analytics cookies to provide the type of content which our visitors are most interested in.  Cookie Policy    
​