2021 Best In KLAS Interactive Patient Systems

Perception

Patient Perspectives on Patient Engagement Technology 2022

26 May 22 | Adam Cherrington and Dan Czech

The pandemic has emphasized the need for healthcare organizations to better accommodate patients’ needs and decrease barriers to effective care. However, patients are frequently absent from discussions around healthcare information technology (HIT). In KLAS’ previous report on the patient perspective , we discovered a lack of alignment between patients’ engagement technology priorities and those of provider organizations and vendors. Since then, KLAS has sought to gain a deeper understanding of what is needed from vendors and providers to drive greater alignment with patients. This report seeks to highlight the patient voice and is one of many KLAS initiatives aimed at more deeply understanding and measuring the patient perspective on HIT.

Provider organizations’ efforts to improve the patient experience have typically relied on standardized, retrospective benchmarking data (predominantly from the CMS-regulated CAHPS survey). However, to really amplify the voice of the patient and meet the rising demands of healthcare consumerism, organizations also need customizable tools that allow them to respond to patient feedback in real time and quickly identify service-recovery options. This report examines the opportunity that exists for the industry to augment a CAHPS-centric approach with more customizable capabilities.

Along with buzzwords like “AI” and “population health,” the term “digital front door” has become more popular but lacks a consensual definition. For this study, KLAS spoke to 27 leading organizations to understand what digital front door means to them, what digital front door strategies and key technologies they use, and what outcomes they have seen. Based on the lessons they have learned along the way, these organizations (most of which use Cerner or Epic for their core EMR) also shared advice for peers seeking to build or improve their digital front door strategies.

Patient engagement technology continues to be offered by a large group of vendors aiming to solve varied, complex challenges—leading to the need for clarity about what capabilities vendors offer to meet provider and payer organizations’ core needs. This study, along with additional deep-dive content on KLAS’ website , seeks to show which vendors report the broadest capability sets, which vendors made the most progress over the last two years, and how the industry as a whole has matured. For reader ease, links to relevant online content are provided where applicable. Note that the data in this report is based on vendor-reported information.

Company/solution	Overall score	Total evaluations	Trend (2020-2021)	Culture	Loyalty	Operations	Product	Relationship	Value	Censinet assessment

pCare (TVR Communications)	92.7	n=25	0%	A	A+	A	A	A	A-

Epic MyChart Bedside	87.8	n=21	0%	B+	A	B+	B	A-	B

SONIFI Health Interactive Patient Engagement Solutions	87.5	n=25	0%	A-	A-	B	B+	B+	B+

Avidex (TeleHealth Services) TeleHealth Services TigrPX Patient Engagement & Education System	85.7	n=15	N/A	A	B+	B	B	B+	B

Get Well GetWellNetwork getwell Inpatient	85.3	n=39	0%	A-	B+	B	B+	A-	C+
	50.0	100.0		*Limited Data

Company/solution	Trend (2020-2021)	Culture	Loyalty	Operations	Product	Relationship	Value

pCare (TVR Communications) 92.7 n=25 COMMENTS	0%	A	A+	A	A	A	A-
Epic MyChart Bedside 87.8 n=21 COMMENTS	0%	B+	A	B+	B	A-	B
SONIFI Health Interactive Patient Engagement Solutions 87.5 n=25 COMMENTS	0%	A-	A-	B	B+	B+	B+
Avidex (TeleHealth Services) TeleHealth Services TigrPX Patient Engagement & Education System 85.7 n=15 COMMENTS	N/A	A	B+	B	B	B+	B
Get Well GetWellNetwork getwell Inpatient 85.3 n=39 COMMENTS	0%	A-	B+	B	B+	A-	C+

Company/solution	Overall performance score	Total evaluations	Culture	Loyalty	Operations	Product	Relationship	Value	Censinet assessment

eVideon Patient Experience Platform * [R] L	94.9	n=14	A+	A+	A	A	A+	A+

Company/solution	Overall performance score	Total evaluations

eVideon Patient Experience Platform * [R] L culture A+ loyalty A+ operations A product A relationship A+ value A+	94.9	n=14

Interactive Patient Systems

Past Interactive Patient Systems Awards

Contact KLAS

Tell us about your organization

How can we help you?