All Categories chevron icon Value Based Care chevron icon Patient Engagement chevron icon Patient Portals
2008 Category Leader Patient Portals

2008 KLAS Category Leader Patient Portals

2024 BEST IN KLAS

Who is theKLAS Category Leader?

Medfusion (Merged to NextGen)

Solutions Not Ranked

Limited Data Products

Score

MyChart*

89.1

Component [C], Not Primary [NP], Regional [R] or Limited Market Share [MS]

*Does not meet minimum KLAS Konfidence level.

Trend does not include the Best KLAS score

See the latest BEST IN KLAS 2018

2024 Best in KLAS Awards - Global Software
2024 GLOBAL
2024 Best in KLAS Awards - Software and Services
2024 BEST IN KLAS

How do Patient Portals solutions compare?


Past Patient Portals Awards

2024
Patient Portals 2024 Patient Portals
2023
Patient Portals 2023 Patient Portals
2022
Patient Portals 2022 Patient Portals
2021
Patient Portals 2021 Patient Portals
2020
Patient Portals 2020 Patient Portals
2019
Patient Portals 2019 Patient Portals
2018
Patient Portals 2018 Patient Portals
2017
Patient Portals 2017 Patient Portals
2015/2016
Patient Portals 2016 Patient Portals
2014
Patient Portals 2014 Patient Portals
2013
Patient Portals 2013 Patient Portals
2012
Patient Portals 2012 Patient Portals
2011
Patient Portals 2011 Patient Portals
2010
Patient Portals 2010 Patient Portals
2009
Patient Portals 2009 Patient Portals
2008
Patient Portals 2008 Patient Portals
2007
Patient Portals (Ambulatory) 2007 Patient Portals (Ambulatory)
Related ReportsView All Reports
Performance
KLAS article icon
Patient Self-Scheduling 2024
06 March 24    |   Adam Cherrington and Ciera Walker
As the digital landscape grows in healthcare and other industries, patients are expecting more seamless and convenient access to healthcare and therefore report that self-scheduling is one of their top healthcare engagement priorities . Provider organizations are responding by offering patient self-scheduling functionality to both increase patient convenience and reduce staff burden. This report focuses on five standalone patient self-scheduling solutions to understand their ease of use, why they were chosen over other types of solutions (e.g., EHR functionality), and whether they are worth the money. Additional insights about the broader patient self-scheduling market are also included.
White Paper
KLAS article icon
Digital Front Door Solutions 2023
03 August 23    |   Spencer Snyder and Stephen Bitteker
The term “digital front door” has become popular in recent years across the healthcare industry. Increasingly, it is used to refer to patient interactions not only before visits but also during and after care. The Health Management Academy and KLAS Research have partnered to create this guide, aimed at helping healthcare organizations understand the market as a whole and their vendor options.
Performance
KLAS article icon
MEDITECH Complete Look 2023
18 July 23    |   Paul Warburton and Tyson Blauer
When making a core HIT purchasing decision, healthcare organizations must take into account how prospective partners deliver across a variety of key technology areas. This MEDITECH Expanse “complete look” provides a high-level analysis of the key products that make up MEDITECH’s enterprise suite. (Other reports in the series do the same for Altera Digital Health [Allscripts] , Epic , Evident , and Oracle Health [Cerner] .) This report focuses on the core Expanse suite; data on MEDITECH’s MAGIC, C/S, and 6.x platforms is excluded.
Performance
KLAS article icon
Oracle Health (Cerner) Complete Look 2023
18 July 23    |   Paul Warburton and Tyson Blauer
When making a core HIT purchasing decision, healthcare organizations must take into account how prospective partners deliver across a variety of key technology areas. This Oracle Health (Cerner) “complete look” provides a high-level analysis of the key products that make up Oracle Health’s enterprise suite. (Other reports in the series do the same for Altera Digital Health [Allscripts] , Epic , Evident , and MEDITECH .)
Performance
KLAS article icon
Epic Complete Look 2023
18 July 23    |   Paul Warburton and Tyson Blauer
When making a core HIT purchasing decision, healthcare organizations must take into account how prospective partners deliver across a variety of key technology areas. This Epic “complete look” provides a high-level analysis of the key products that make up Epic’s enterprise suite. (Other reports in the series do the same for Altera Digital Health [Allscripts] , Evident , MEDITECH , and Oracle Health [Cerner] .)
Performance
KLAS article icon
Independent Ambulatory Patient Portals 2023
28 February 23    |   Alex McIntosh and Coray Tate
Patient portals (tools used by healthcare providers to engage with patients) can greatly influence a patient’s ability to seek and receive care. Since the outbreak of COVID-19, healthcare organizations have become keenly interested in technology that gives patients ownership of their health and enhances office efficiencies. Though KLAS has historically looked at how portals perform in the IDN setting, this report examines the experience of customers in the independent ambulatory space (clinics not owned by a hospital/health system) to share their perspective and help other such organizations understand portals’ impact on patient care.
Perception
KLAS article icon
Patient Perspectives on Patient Engagement Technology 2022
26 May 22    |   Adam Cherrington and Dan Czech
The pandemic has emphasized the need for healthcare organizations to better accommodate patients’ needs and decrease barriers to effective care. However, patients are frequently absent from discussions around healthcare information technology (HIT). In KLAS’ previous report on the patient perspective , we discovered a lack of alignment between patients’ engagement technology priorities and those of provider organizations and vendors. Since then, KLAS has sought to gain a deeper understanding of what is needed from vendors and providers to drive greater alignment with patients. This report seeks to highlight the patient voice and is one of many KLAS initiatives aimed at more deeply understanding and measuring the patient perspective on HIT.

Konfidence

Konfidence level
Konfidence Level Description
Products must have at least 30 live organizations participating for software and at least 15 live organizations for professional services. Exception to this is Transcription Services (30).
Products must have at least 20 live organizations participating for software and at least 10 live organizations for professional services. Exception to this is Transcription Services (20).
Products must have at least 15 live organizations participating for software and at least 6 live organizations for professional services. Exception to this is Transcription Services
-
The Konfidence level on this product rating is low. These results are for early trend detection. As more performance data is received, the result is likely to have a wide variance.
We use cookies! We use essential and basic aggregated, depersonalized Google Analytics cookies to provide the type of content which our visitors are most interested in.  Cookie Policy    
​