Filters
Centricity PACS (Global) Commentary
Filtered view: (Middle East/Africa)
Subject Expert
Monique Rasband
VP of Engagement
If you don't have a login, getting started is easy.
User Commentary
What feeling does this excerpt express?
Based only on this individual comment—not the respondent's overall evaluation.
- Positive
- Neutral
- Negative
What is this excerpt about?
One comment can relate to more than one customer-experience area.
- Culture
- Promises, expectations, and proactive service
- Loyalty
- Satisfaction, recommendation, buying again, and long-term plans
- Operations
- Training, implementation, and ease of use
- Product
- Quality, capabilities, integration, and new technology
- Relationship
- Support, partnership, and executive involvement
- Value
- Money's worth, fair charging, outcomes, and expectations
How satisfied is the respondent overall?
The category comes from their Overall Score—not from the tone of this excerpt.
- 90+
- Very Satisfied
- 70–89.9
- Satisfied
- Below 70
- Dissatisfied
- 90+
- Very Satisfied
- 80–89.9
- Satisfied
- Below 80
- Dissatisfied
What I like most about Centricity PACS is the user-friendly interface and the smooth workflow.
The biggest opportunities for improvement are enhancing system speed and improving customization...
GE HealthCare's biggest strengths are their strong system and very responsive support.
I would recommend improving performance under high workloads and providing more flexibility for...
Centricity PACS is a great system for big organizations with high volume. We have high standards...
One reason we decided to go with GE HealthCare is that we have experience with them. We tried other...
GE HealthCare is a big, well-known company, and they have a very good and well-trained team. They...
During our go-live, GE HealthCare had staff on-site to support us, and that gave us the power to...
We don’t feel that we are losing by investing in Centricity PACS because the life of a human being...
Commentary Summary
Comment Type Breakout