2012 Best In KLAS Practice Management 1-10 Physicians

2012 Best in KLAS Practice Management (1-10 Physicians)

Who is Best in KLAS?

Solutions Not Ranked

Score

Component [C], Not Primary [NP], Regional [R] or Limited Market Share [MS]

CareCloud Central [1]*

73.0

*Does not meet minimum KLAS Konfidence level.

Trend does not include the Best KLAS score

See the latest BEST IN KLAS 2018

2021 Best in KLAS Awards - Global Software
2021 GLOBAL
2021 Best in KLAS Awards - Software and Professional Services
2021 BEST IN KLAS

How do Practice Management solutions compare?


athenahealth Logo
athenahealth athenaCollector
Konfidence
Average for Practice Management78.0
40
 
100
 

2

Greenway Health Logo
Greenway Medical PrimeSuite Practice
 
 

3

eMDs Logo
e-MDs Bill
 
 

4

Medical Mastermind Logo
Software Unlimited Medical Mastermind PM
 
 

5

Optum Logo
OptumInsight Ingenix CareTracker PM
 
 

6

AdvancedMD Logo
AdvancedMD PM
 
 

7

NextGen Healthcare Logo
NextGen Healthcare EPM
 
 

8

Henry Schein MicroMD Logo
Henry Schein Medical MicroMD PM
 
 

9

eClinicalWorks Logo
eClinicalWorks PM
 
 

10

eMDs Logo
Aprima PM
 
 

11

Virence Health Logo
GE Healthcare Centricity Practice Solution PM
 
 

12

Cerner Logo
Cerner PowerWorks Specialty PM
 
 

13

Allscripts Logo
Allscripts PM
 
 

14

CompuGroup Medical Logo
CompuGroup Medical HPM
 
 

15

Greenway Health Logo
Vitera Intergy (Sage)
 
 

16

eMDs Logo
McKesson Practice Partner Billing and Scheduling
 
Software 0.0
 

Past Practice Management Awards

2021
Practice Management 2021 11-75 Physicians 11-75 Physicians
Practice Management 2021 Over 75 Physicians Over 75 Physicians
2020
Practice Management 2020 11-75 Physicians 11-75 Physicians
Practice Management 2020 Over 75 Physicians Over 75 Physicians
2019
Practice Management 2019 11-75 Physicians 11-75 Physicians
Practice Management 2019 Over 75 Physicians Over 75 Physicians
2018
Practice Management 2018 11-75 Physicians 11-75 Physicians
Practice Management 2018 Over 75 Physicians Over 75 Physicians
2017
Practice Management 2017 11-75 Physicians 11-75 Physicians
Practice Management 2017 Over 75 Physicians Over 75 Physicians
2015/2016
Practice Management 2016 1-10 Physicians 1-10 Physicians
Practice Management 2016 11-75 Physicians 11-75 Physicians
Practice Management 2016 Over 75 Physicians Over 75 Physicians
2014
Practice Management 2014 1-10 Physicians 1-10 Physicians
Practice Management 2014 11-75 Physicians 11-75 Physicians
Practice Management 2014 Over 75 Physicians Over 75 Physicians
2013
Practice Management 2013 1-10 Physicians 1-10 Physicians
Practice Management 2013 11-75 Physicians 11-75 Physicians
Practice Management 2013 Over 75 Physicians Over 75 Physicians
2012
Practice Management 2012 1-10 Physicians 1-10 Physicians
Practice Management 2012 11-75 Physicians 11-75 Physicians
Practice Management 2012 Over 75 Physicians Over 75 Physicians
2011
Practice Management 2011 1-10 Physicians 1-10 Physicians
Practice Management 2011 11-75 Physicians 11-75 Physicians
Practice Management 2011 Over 75 Physicians Over 75 Physicians
2010
Practice Management 1 Physician 1 Physician
Practice Management 2-5 Physicians 2-5 Physicians
Practice Management 26-100 Physicians 26-100 Physicians
Practice Management 6-25 Physicians 6-25 Physicians
Practice Management Over 100 Physicians Over 100 Physicians
2009
Practice Management 1 Physician 1 Physician
Practice Management 2-5 Physicians 2-5 Physicians
Practice Management 26-100 Physicians 26-100 Physicians
Practice Management 6-25 Physicians 6-25 Physicians
Practice Management Over 100 Physicians Over 100 Physicians
2008
Practice Management 1 Physician 1 Physician
Practice Management 2-5 Physicians 2-5 Physicians
Practice Management 26-100 Physicians 26-100 Physicians
Practice Management 6-25 Physicians 6-25 Physicians
Practice Management Over 100 Physicians Over 100 Physicians
2007
Ambulatory Billing and Scheduling (1-5 Physicians) Ambulatory Billing and Scheduling (1-5 Physicians)
Ambulatory Billing and Scheduling 26-100 Physicians 26-100 Physicians
Ambulatory Billing and Scheduling 6-25 Physicians 6-25 Physicians
Ambulatory Billing and Scheduling Over 100 Physicians Over 100 Physicians
2006
Ambulatory Billing and Scheduling 1-5 Physicians 1-5 Physicians
Ambulatory Billing & Scheduling 26-100 Physicians 26-100 Physicians
Ambulatory Billing and Scheduling 6-25 Physicians 6-25 Physicians
Ambulatory Billing & Scheduling Over 100 Physicians Over 100 Physicians
2005
Ambulatory Billing and Scheduling 1-5 Physicians 1-5 Physicians
Ambulatory Billing & Scheduling 26-100 Physicians 26-100 Physicians
Ambulatory Billing and Scheduling 6-25 Physicians 6-25 Physicians
Ambulatory Billing & Scheduling Over 100 Physicians Over 100 Physicians
Related Reports View All Reports
Best in KLAS
KLAS article icon
2021 Best in KLAS Awards - Software and Professional Services
02 February 21    |   Mark Allphin and Sam Eaquinto
The Best in KLAS report recognizes software and services companies who excel in helping healthcare professionals improve patient care. All rankings are a direct result of the feedback of thousands of providers over the last year. A Best in KLAS award signifies to the healthcare IT industry the commitment and partnership that the top vendors should provide. Read the report to see the top-rated medical software and services for 2021. Watch sessions from our first-ever virtual Best In KLAS Award Show to hear from the winning vendors in each segment. View Awards Show Recordings
Performance
KLAS article icon
Cerner Revenue Cycle Management, Report 4 of 4
13 February 20    |   Alex McIntosh and Boyd Stewart
In August 2018, representatives from some of Cerner’s largest and most complex customers met with Cerner executives to participate in a transparent summit around revenue cycle success. The purpose of this summit was to provide insights that would enable Cerner to conduct a significant pivot to regain client confidence and deliver a world-class RCM solution. In KLAS’ previous follow-up reports, customers reported that Cerner has delivered a road map, become more transparent, and worked to improve client relationships. This report is the final in the series and focuses on the tangible improvements that have been realized since the August 2018 summit.
Performance
KLAS article icon
Cerner Revenue Cycle Management, Report 3 of 4
29 August 19    |   Alex McIntosh and Boyd Stewart
In August 2018, representatives from some of Cerner’s largest and most complex customers met with Cerner executives to participate in a transparent summit around revenue cycle success. The purpose of this summit was to provide insights that would enable Cerner to conduct a significant pivot to regain client confidence and deliver a world-class RCM solution. After the summit, Cerner made specific commitments to clients on when issues would be addressed. This report is a follow-up on Cerner’s progress toward those commitments.
Perception
KLAS article icon
Cerner Revenue Cycle Management, Report 2 of 4
08 May 19    |   Alex McIntosh and Boyd Stewart
In August 2018, representatives from some of Cerner’s largest and most complex customers met with Cerner executives to participate in a transparent summit around revenue cycle success. The purpose of this summit was to provide Cerner with enough insight to enable Cerner to conduct a significant pivot to regain client confidence in Cerner and deliver a world-class RCM solution. After the summit, Cerner made specific commitments to clients on when issues would be addressed.

Konfidence

Konfidence level
Konfidence Level Description
Products must have at least 30 live organizations participating for software and at least 15 live organizations for professional services. Exception to this is Transcription Services (30).
Products must have at least 20 live organizations participating for software and at least 10 live organizations for professional services. Exception to this is Transcription Services (20).
Products must have at least 15 live organizations participating for software and at least 6 live organizations for professional services. Exception to this is Transcription Services
-
The Konfidence level on this product rating is low. These results are for early trend detection. As more performance data is received, the result is likely to have a wide variance.
We use cookies! We use essential and basic aggregated, depersonalized Google Analytics cookies to provide the type of content which our visitors are most interested in.  Cookie Policy    
​