Home chevron icon ImagingSystems chevron icon Imaging Software chevron icon PACS
2007 Best In KLAS PACS Acute Care Large

2007 Best in KLAS PACS (Acute Care Large)

Who is Best in KLAS?

See the latest BEST IN KLAS 2018

2022 Best in KLAS Awards - Global Software
2022 GLOBAL
2022 Best in KLAS Awards - Software and Professional Services
2022 BEST IN KLAS

How do PACS solutions compare?


IBM Watson Health Logo
DR Systems Unity
Konfidence
Average for PACS80.3
40
 
100
 

2

Philips Logo
iSite (Stentor)
 
 

3

Fujifilm Logo
FUJIFILM Synapse
 
 

4

Change Healthcare Logo
McKesson Horizon Medical Imaging
 
 

5

IBM Watson Health Logo
AMICAS Vision Series
 
 

6

Agfa HealthCare Logo
Agfa IMPAX
 
 

7

IBM Watson Health Logo
Emageon Enterprise Visual
 
 

8

GE Healthcare Logo
GE Centricity PACS
 
 

9

Philips Logo
Carestream (Kodak) DirectView
 
 

10

Siemens Healthineers Logo
Siemens SIENET
 
Software 0.0
 

Past PACS Awards

2022
PACS 2022 Large - 300K+ Studies Large - 300K+ Studies
PACS 2022 Small - Under 300K Studies Small - Under 300K Studies
2021
PACS 2021 Large - 300K+ Studies Large - 300K+ Studies
PACS 2021 Small - Under 300K Studies Small - Under 300K Studies
2020
PACS 2020 Large - 300K+ Studies Large - 300K+ Studies
PACS 2020 Small - Under 300K Studies Small - Under 300K Studies
2019
PACS 2019 Community Hospital Community Hospital
PACS 2019 Imaging Centers/Ambulatory Imaging Centers/Ambulatory
PACS 2019 Large Hospital / IDN Large Hospital / IDN
2018
PACS 2018 Community Hospital Community Hospital
PACS 2018 Imaging Centers/Ambulatory Imaging Centers/Ambulatory
PACS 2018 Large Hospital/IDN Large Hospital/IDN
2017
PACS 2017 Community Hospital Community Hospital
PACS 2017 Imaging Centers/Ambulatory Imaging Centers/Ambulatory
PACS 2017 Large Hospital/IDN Large Hospital/IDN
2015/2016
PACS 2016 PACS
PACS 2016 Ambulatory Ambulatory
PACS 2016 Community Community
2014
PACS 2014 PACS
PACS 2014 Ambulatory Ambulatory
PACS 2014 Community Community
2013
PACS 2013 1-200 Beds 1-200 Beds
PACS 2013 Ambulatory Care Ambulatory Care
PACS 2013 Large - Over 200 Beds Large - Over 200 Beds
2012
PACS 2012 Ambulatory Care Ambulatory Care
PACS 2012 Community 1-200 Beds Community 1-200 Beds
PACS 2012 Large - Over 200 Beds Large - Over 200 Beds
2011
PACS 2011 Ambulatory Care Ambulatory Care
PACS 2011 Community - 200 or Less Beds Community - 200 or Less Beds
PACS 2011 Large - Over 200 Beds Large - Over 200 Beds
2010
PACS 2010 Ambulatory Care Ambulatory Care
PACS 2010 Large - Over 200 Beds Large - Over 200 Beds
PACS 2010 Small - 1-200 Beds Small - 1-200 Beds
2009
PACS 2009 PACS
PACS 2009 Ambulatory Ambulatory
PACS 2009 Community Community
2008
PACS 2008 PACS
PACS 2008 Ambulatory Ambulatory
PACS 2008 Community Community
2007
PACS 2007 Acute Care Large Acute Care Large
PACS 2007 Ambulatory and Imaging Center Ambulatory and Imaging Center
PACS 2007 Community Community
2006
PACS 2006 Acute Care Large Acute Care Large
PACS 2006 Ambulatory and Imaging Center Ambulatory and Imaging Center
PACS 2006 Community Community
2005
PACS 2005 Acute Care Large Acute Care Large
PACS 2005 Acute Care Small Acute Care Small
PACS 2005 Ambulatory and Imaging Center Ambulatory and Imaging Center
Related ReportsView All Reports
Best in KLAS
KLAS article icon
2021 Best in KLAS Awards - Software and Professional Services
02 February 21    |   Mark Allphin and Sam Eaquinto
The Best in KLAS report recognizes software and services companies who excel in helping healthcare professionals improve patient care. All rankings are a direct result of the feedback of thousands of providers over the last year. A Best in KLAS award signifies to the healthcare IT industry the commitment and partnership that the top vendors should provide. Read the report to see the top-rated medical software and services for 2021. Watch sessions from our first-ever virtual Best In KLAS Award Show to hear from the winning vendors in each segment. View Awards Show Recordings
Performance
KLAS article icon
PACS 2020
18 June 20    |   Monique Rasband
The PACS market is currently an evolving, dynamic space ripe for disruption—many provider organizations are replacing legacy PACS solutions and enterprise imaging (EI) is on the rise. As provider organizations examine potential vendor partners, the following three considerations are top of mind: Are current customers satisfied (and does the vendor deliver consistently regardless of client volume)? Can the vendor scale to meet the complex needs of large-volume organizations? What is the vendor’s EI strategy and how well can they provide EI guidance? Today, no vendor has proven themselves in all three areas. This report will examine vendor performance in each.

Konfidence

Konfidence level
Konfidence Level Description
Products must have at least 30 live organizations participating for software and at least 15 live organizations for professional services. Exception to this is Transcription Services (30).
Products must have at least 20 live organizations participating for software and at least 10 live organizations for professional services. Exception to this is Transcription Services (20).
Products must have at least 15 live organizations participating for software and at least 6 live organizations for professional services. Exception to this is Transcription Services
-
The Konfidence level on this product rating is low. These results are for early trend detection. As more performance data is received, the result is likely to have a wide variance.
We use cookies! We use essential and basic aggregated, depersonalized Google Analytics cookies to provide the type of content which our visitors are most interested in.  Cookie Policy    
​