Home chevron icon Ambulatory & Post Acute Care chevron icon Physician Practice Solutions chevron icon Ambulatory EHR
2018 Best In KLAS Ambulatory EMR Over 75 Physicians

2018 Best in KLAS Ambulatory EMR (Over 75 Physicians)

Who is Best in KLAS?



How do they score? In five key performance categories

Market Segment Average   Epic


Sales & Contracting

Implementation & Training

Functionality & Upgrades

Service & Support

General

50
100

Solutions Not Ranked

Limited Data Products

Score

Prime Suite (EHR)*

46.9

LSS MPM*

56.7

Allscripts Professional EHR*

71.2

Component [C], Not Primary [NP], Regional [R] or Limited Market Share [MS]

GE Healthcare Centricity Practice Solution EMR [NP]*

67.4

Intergy EHR* [NP]*

75.6

*Does not meet minimum KLAS Konfidence level.

Trend does not include the Best KLAS score

See the latest BEST IN KLAS 2018

2024 Best in KLAS Awards - Global Software
2024 GLOBAL
2024 Best in KLAS Awards - Software and Services
2024 BEST IN KLAS

How do Ambulatory EMR solutions compare?


How do the top three solutions trend?


Epic-Epic EpicCare Ambulatory EMR
athenahealth-athenahealth athenaClinicals
Oracle Health-Cerner PowerChart Ambulatory

Past Ambulatory EMR Awards

2024
Ambulatory EHR 2024 11-75 Physicians | Independent 11-75 Physicians | Independent
Ambulatory EHR 2024 Health System Owned Health System Owned
Ambulatory EHR 2024 Over 75 Physicians | Independent Over 75 Physicians | Independent
2023
Ambulatory EMR 2023 11-75 Physicians | Independent 11-75 Physicians | Independent
Ambulatory EMR 2023 Health System Owned Health System Owned
Ambulatory EMR 2023 Over 75 Physicians | Independent Over 75 Physicians | Independent
2022
Ambulatory EMR 2022 11-75 Physicians 11-75 Physicians
Ambulatory EMR 2022 Over 75 Physicians Over 75 Physicians
2021
Ambulatory EMR 2021 11-75 Physicians 11-75 Physicians
Ambulatory EMR 2021 Over 75 Physicians Over 75 Physicians
2020
Ambulatory EMR 2020 11-75 Physicians 11-75 Physicians
Ambulatory EMR 2020 Over 75 Physicians Over 75 Physicians
2019
Ambulatory EMR 2019 11-75 Physicians 11-75 Physicians
Ambulatory EMR 2019 Over 75 Physicians Over 75 Physicians
2018
Ambulatory EMR 2018 11-75 Physicians 11-75 Physicians
Ambulatory EMR 2018 Over 75 Physicians Over 75 Physicians
2017
Ambulatory EMR 2017 11-75 Physicians 11-75 Physicians
Ambulatory EMR 2017 Over 75 Physicians Over 75 Physicians
2015/2016
Ambulatory EMR 2016 1-10 Physicians 1-10 Physicians
Ambulatory EMR 2016 11-75 Physicians 11-75 Physicians
Ambulatory EMR 2016 Over 75 Physicians Over 75 Physicians
2014
Ambulatory EMR 2014 1-10 Physicians 1-10 Physicians
Ambulatory EMR 2014 11-75 Physicians 11-75 Physicians
Ambulatory EMR 2014 Over 75 Physicians Over 75 Physicians
2013
Ambulatory EMR 2013 1-10 Physicians 1-10 Physicians
Ambulatory EMR 2013 11-75 Physicians 11-75 Physicians
Ambulatory EMR 2013 Over 75 Physicians Over 75 Physicians
2012
Ambulatory EMR 2012 1-10 Physicians 1-10 Physicians
Ambulatory EMR 2012 11-75 Physicians 11-75 Physicians
Ambulatory EMR 2012 Over 75 Physicians Over 75 Physicians
2011
Ambulatory EMR 2011 1-10 Physicians 1-10 Physicians
Ambulatory EMR 2011 11-75 Physicians 11-75 Physicians
Ambulatory EMR 2011 Over 75 Physicians Over 75 Physicians
2010
Ambulatory EMR 1 Physician 1 Physician
Ambulatory EMR 2-5 Physicians 2-5 Physicians
Ambulatory EMR 26-100 Physicians 26-100 Physicians
Ambulatory EMR 6-25 Physicians 6-25 Physicians
Ambulatory EMR Over 100 Physicians Over 100 Physicians
2009
Ambulatory EMR 1 Physician 1 Physician
Ambulatory EMR 2-5 Physicians 2-5 Physicians
Ambulatory EMR 26-100 Physicians 26-100 Physicians
Ambulatory EMR 6-25 Physicians 6-25 Physicians
Ambulatory EMR Over 100 Physicians Over 100 Physicians
2008
Ambulatory EMR 1 Physician 1 Physician
Ambulatory EMR 2-5 Physicians 2-5 Physicians
Ambulatory EMR 26-100 Physicians 26-100 Physicians
Ambulatory EMR 6-25 Physicians 6-25 Physicians
Ambulatory EMR Over 100 Physicians Over 100 Physicians
2007
Ambulatory EMR (1-5 Physicians) 2007 Ambulatory EMR (1-5 Physicians)
Ambulatory EMR 2007 26-100 Physicians 26-100 Physicians
Ambulatory EMR 2007 6-25 Physicians 6-25 Physicians
2006
Ambulatory EMR 2006 1-5 Physicians 1-5 Physicians
Ambulatory EMR 2006 6-25 Physicians 6-25 Physicians
Ambulatory EMR 2006 Over 25 Physicians Over 25 Physicians
2005
Ambulatory EMR 2005 1-5 Physicians 1-5 Physicians
Ambulatory EMR 2005 6-25 Physicians 6-25 Physicians
Ambulatory EMR 2005 Over 25 Physicians Over 25 Physicians
Related ReportsView All Reports
Performance
KLAS article icon
Ambulatory Pediatric Solutions 2024
11 March 24    |   Andy Paulsen and Chris Clune
Amid changing regulations from entities like the American Academy of Pediatrics and HIPAA, pediatric clinics’ functionality needs are increasing and becoming more specific. Most ambulatory pediatric practices are small organizations with limited budgets, and they have to prioritize functionalities that are most important and forgo others to stay within budget. In addition to established pediatric-specific vendors, broad-specialty vendors are addressing this challenge by developing pediatric-specific EHRs or adapting existing platforms to cater to customer needs. Following KLAS’ 2023 report on the pediatrics market , this report examines how well pediatric-specific and broad-specialty vendors meet the unique customer needs of this niche market.
Performance
KLAS article icon
MEDITECH Complete Look 2023
18 July 23    |   Paul Warburton and Tyson Blauer
When making a core HIT purchasing decision, healthcare organizations must take into account how prospective partners deliver across a variety of key technology areas. This MEDITECH Expanse “complete look” provides a high-level analysis of the key products that make up MEDITECH’s enterprise suite. (Other reports in the series do the same for Altera Digital Health [Allscripts] , Epic , Evident , and Oracle Health [Cerner] .) This report focuses on the core Expanse suite; data on MEDITECH’s MAGIC, C/S, and 6.x platforms is excluded.
Performance
KLAS article icon
Oracle Health (Cerner) Complete Look 2023
18 July 23    |   Paul Warburton and Tyson Blauer
When making a core HIT purchasing decision, healthcare organizations must take into account how prospective partners deliver across a variety of key technology areas. This Oracle Health (Cerner) “complete look” provides a high-level analysis of the key products that make up Oracle Health’s enterprise suite. (Other reports in the series do the same for Altera Digital Health [Allscripts] , Epic , Evident , and MEDITECH .)
Performance
KLAS article icon
Epic Complete Look 2023
18 July 23    |   Paul Warburton and Tyson Blauer
When making a core HIT purchasing decision, healthcare organizations must take into account how prospective partners deliver across a variety of key technology areas. This Epic “complete look” provides a high-level analysis of the key products that make up Epic’s enterprise suite. (Other reports in the series do the same for Altera Digital Health [Allscripts] , Evident , MEDITECH , and Oracle Health [Cerner] .)
Performance
KLAS article icon
Altera Digital Health (Allscripts) Complete Look 2023
18 July 23    |   Paul Warburton and Tyson Blauer
When making a core HIT purchasing decision, healthcare organizations must take into account how prospective partners deliver across a variety of key technology areas. This Altera Digital Health (Allscripts) Sunrise “complete look” provides a high-level analysis of the key products that make up Altera Digital Health’s enterprise suite. (Other reports in the series do the same for Epic , Evident , MEDITECH , and Oracle Health [Cerner] .) This report focuses on the core Sunrise suite and its supporting technology; data on Altera Digital Health’s standalone ambulatory platforms (TouchWorks and Professional) is excluded.
Performance
KLAS article icon
Ambulatory and Enterprise EMR Interoperability 2023
16 March 23    |   Coray Tate and Paul Warburton
Interoperability is a continued area of critical focus for the healthcare industry. There is no question that progress is being made, but there is still significant room for improvement. For this report, KLAS talked to vendor-identified deep adopters to take a holistic look at the current state of interoperability in ambulatory and enterprise EMRs and measure how close we are to an ideal state. The results reveal each vendor’s strengths and weaknesses within various areas of interoperability.
Perception
KLAS article icon
Transitions of Care 2022
29 December 22    |   Bradley Hunter and Paul Warburton
Inefficient care transitions lead to wasted time and energy, increased risk of human error, and potentially poor experiences for both patients and providers. Despite the industry’s attempts to ensure the right information is sent to the right people at the right time, healthcare organizations must often revert to manual processes for data entry, verification, and communication. Some organizations use or want to use technology to streamline their transitions of care (TOC). This report—KLAS’ first to look at TOC—draws from the perspectives of 95 healthcare leaders across multiple care settings to understand their adoption of care transition technology, the challenges they encounter in their care settings, and the vendors they are considering.
Performance
KLAS article icon
Midsize/Large Ambulatory EMR 2022
05 July 22    |   Aaron Gleave and Alex McIntosh
Technology needs are constantly evolving in healthcare, yet vendor development efforts may not always align with provider organizations’ top priorities. To better understand what these priorities are in midsize and large ambulatory practices (11+ physicians), KLAS interviewed over 500 respondents from such organizations regarding the areas most in need of improvement from their EMR vendor.

Konfidence

Konfidence level
Konfidence Level Description
Products must have at least 30 live organizations participating for software and at least 15 live organizations for professional services. Exception to this is Transcription Services (30).
Products must have at least 20 live organizations participating for software and at least 10 live organizations for professional services. Exception to this is Transcription Services (20).
Products must have at least 15 live organizations participating for software and at least 6 live organizations for professional services. Exception to this is Transcription Services
-
The Konfidence level on this product rating is low. These results are for early trend detection. As more performance data is received, the result is likely to have a wide variance.
We use cookies! We use essential and basic aggregated, depersonalized Google Analytics cookies to provide the type of content which our visitors are most interested in.  Cookie Policy    
​