2018 Best In KLAS Population Health

2018 Best in KLAS Population Health

2021 BEST IN KLAS

Who is Best in KLAS?



How do they score? In five key performance categories

Market Segment Average   Cedar Gate Technologies


Sales & Contracting

Implementation & Training

Functionality & Upgrades

Service & Support

General

50
100

Solutions Not Ranked

Limited Data Products

Score

Arcadia Analytics*

85.8

Change Healthcare Risk Manager (McKesson)*

76.1

Conifer Health Solutions Population Health Intelligence Platform*

56.7

Explorys IBM Watson Health Explorys*

54.9

Forward Health Group PopulationManager*

95.3

GE Healthcare Caradigm Population Health*

76.6

Health Catalyst Population Health Applications*

88.7

Lightbeam Population Health Management*

86.7

Lumeris Accountable Delivery System Platform*

86.0

Medecision Aerial for Population Health Management*

79.4

Optum (Advisory Board) Crimson Population Health*

60.1

Verscend Population Health Analytics*

81.4

Component [C], Not Primary [NP], Regional [R] or Limited Market Share [MS]

HealthEC Care Manager* [R]*

94.3

SPH Analytics Population Care (MDInsight)* [R]*

82.6

*Does not meet minimum KLAS Konfidence level.

Trend does not include the Best KLAS score

See the latest BEST IN KLAS 2018

2021 Best in KLAS Awards - Global Software
2021 GLOBAL
2021 Best in KLAS Awards - Software and Professional Services
2021 BEST IN KLAS

How do Population Health solutions compare?


How do the top three solutions trend?


Cedar Gate Technologies-Enli CareManager
Epic-Epic Healthy Planet
i2i Population Health-i2i Population Health i2iTracks

Past Population Health Awards

2021
Population Health Management 2021 Population Health Management
2020
Population Health Management 2020 Population Health Management
2019
Population Health 2019 Population Health
2018
Population Health 2018 Population Health
2017
Population Health 2017 Population Health
2015/2016
Population Health 2016 Population Health
2014
Population Health 2014 Population Health
Related Reports View All Reports
Performance
KLAS article icon
Population Health Vendor Overview 2021
22 June 21    |   Bradley Hunter and Cathy McCabe
Provider organizations looking to advance their value-based care strategies often look to population health management (PHM) technology to give them the confidence to move forward with value-based care. This report seeks to provide transparency into the major PHM technology offerings available today—the types of organizations that typically use the systems, what the customer experience is like, which solutions are seeing the most market energy, and the breadth of their PHM capabilities. PHM insights that go beyond this study’s general overview can be found here .
Performance
KLAS article icon
SDOH Referral Networks 2021
30 March 21    |   Bradley Hunter and Paul Warburton
Adoption of technology to help provider organizations manage SDOH referrals is still early, but interest is growing as organizations seek to take on more value-based reimbursement risk. This report provides a first look at customer satisfaction with various SDOH referral network solutions and examines the parts of the SDOH referral process in which these solutions are being used. All measured vendors in this early market have overall scores above 90 (out of 100), indicating high overall satisfaction. Shifts in satisfaction are possible as the market matures and the number of KLAS ratings increases.
Best in KLAS
KLAS article icon
2021 Best in KLAS Awards - Software and Professional Services
02 February 21    |   Mark Allphin and Sam Eaquinto
The Best in KLAS report recognizes software and services companies who excel in helping healthcare professionals improve patient care. All rankings are a direct result of the feedback of thousands of providers over the last year. A Best in KLAS award signifies to the healthcare IT industry the commitment and partnership that the top vendors should provide. Read the report to see the top-rated medical software and services for 2021. Watch sessions from our first-ever virtual Best In KLAS Award Show to hear from the winning vendors in each segment. View Awards Show Recordings
First Look
KLAS article icon
Relevant
29 January 21    |   Bradley Hunter and Sam Eaquinto
FQHCs have only had a couple of options to choose between in the last few years when it came to solutions that support taking on risk through value-based care. Relevant’s data analytics platform is intended to help community health centers make better decisions based on data. This report is KLAS’ first look at the experience of Relevant’s clients and seeks to provide early insights into satisfaction among these customers.
White Paper
KLAS article icon
Value-Based Reimbursement 2020
01 October 20    |   Bradley Hunter and Paul Warburton
Insights from CHIME’s 2019 “HealthCare’s Most Wired” data, KLAS Population Health Management Cornerstone Summit, and KLAS Decision Insights In the nearly 10 years since accountable care organizations were first established, healthcare organizations have been slow to take on risk-based agreements, especially those with downside risk. While the industry agrees that the rising costs and stagnant outcomes of fee-for-service (FFS) are not sustainable, healthcare executives are becoming less optimistic about how quickly value-based reimbursement (VBR) will outpace FFS. This report examines data from a variety of sources to measure industry progress toward VBR and explore how technology is being used to support it.
White Paper
KLAS article icon
PHM Cornerstone Summit 2019 White Paper
01 April 19    |   Bradley Hunter
When CMS rolled out the Medicare Shared Savings Program in 2011, it helped initiate a wave of optimism that value-based reimbursement (VBR) programs would go a long way toward resolving the persistent problem of rising healthcare costs. Eight years later, some say that VBR has not lived up to its promises, and enthusiasm seems to be shrinking as many provider organizations hesitate to take on meaningful risk. Those that press forward often find that expected financial outcomes are out of reach. What happened to dampen enthusiasm? Why is success so difficult to achieve? On November 14, 2018, leading executives from provider, payer, and vendor organizations convened in Salt Lake City, UT, to help answer these questions. Together, they identified strategic and operational barriers that have dampened VBR headway as well as potential solutions to clear the way. They also discussed ways to measure VBR progress in the future at both national and organizational levels. This document is being publicly shared to help all those that may benefit from the combined experience and expertise of summit attendees. (See page 15 for a list of attendees.)

Konfidence

Konfidence level
Konfidence Level Description
Products must have at least 30 live organizations participating for software and at least 15 live organizations for professional services. Exception to this is Transcription Services (30).
Products must have at least 20 live organizations participating for software and at least 10 live organizations for professional services. Exception to this is Transcription Services (20).
Products must have at least 15 live organizations participating for software and at least 6 live organizations for professional services. Exception to this is Transcription Services
-
The Konfidence level on this product rating is low. These results are for early trend detection. As more performance data is received, the result is likely to have a wide variance.
We use cookies! We use essential and basic aggregated, depersonalized Google Analytics cookies to provide the type of content which our visitors are most interested in.  Cookie Policy    
​