All Categories chevron icon Value- Based Care chevron icon Population Health chevron icon Population Health Management
2018 Best In KLAS Population Health

2018 Best in KLAS Population Health

2025 BEST IN KLAS

Who is Best in KLAS?



How do they score? In five key performance categories

Market Segment Average   Cedar Gate Technologies


Sales & Contracting

Implementation & Training

Functionality & Upgrades

Service & Support

General

50
100

Solutions Not Ranked

Limited Data Products

Score

Optum (Advisory Board) Crimson Population Health*

60.1

Analytics*

85.8

GE Healthcare Caradigm Population Health*

76.6

Population Health Intelligence Platform*

56.7

Verscend Population Health Analytics*

81.4

PopulationManager*

95.3

Population Health Applications*

88.7

Explorys IBM Watson Health Explorys*

54.9

Population Health Management*

86.7

Accountable Delivery System Platform*

86.0

Aerial for Population Health Management*

79.4

Change Healthcare Risk Manager (McKesson)*

76.1

Component [C], Not Primary [NP], Regional [R] or Limited Market Share [MS]

SPH Analytics Population Care (MDInsight)* [R]*

82.6

HealthEC Care Manager* [R]*

94.3

*Does not meet minimum KLAS Konfidence level.

Trend does not include the Best KLAS score

See the latest BEST IN KLAS 2018

2025 Best in KLAS Awards - Global Software
2025 GLOBAL
2025 Best in KLAS Awards - Software and Services
2025 BEST IN KLAS

How do Population Health solutions compare?


Cedar Gate Technologies Logo
Enli CareManager
Konfidence
Average for Population Health79.3
50
87.6
 
100
 

2

Epic Logo
Healthy Planet
86.0
 
 

3

i2i Population Health Logo
i2iTracks
84.9
 
 

4

IBM Logo
Phytel IBM Watson Health Phytel
84.8
 
 

5

athenahealth Logo
Population Health
83.3
 
 

6

Optum Logo
One Population Health
80.3
 
 

7

Altera Digital Health Logo
Allscripts CareInMotion
78.2
 
 

8

Philips Logo
Wellcentive Advance Outcomes Manager
78.1
 
 

9

Oracle Health Logo
Cerner HealtheIntent Suite
77.5
 
 

10

eClinicalWorks Logo
CCMR
71.4
 
Software 80.2
 

How do the top three solutions trend?


Cedar Gate Technologies-Enli CareManager
Epic-Epic Healthy Planet
i2i Population Health-i2i Population Health i2iTracks

Past Population Health Awards

2025
Population Health Management 2025 Population Health Management
2024
Population Health Management 2024 Population Health Management
2023
Population Health Management 2023 Population Health Management
2022
Population Health Management 2022 Population Health Management
2021
Population Health Management 2021 Population Health Management
2020
Population Health Management 2020 Population Health Management
2019
Population Health 2019 Population Health
2018
Population Health 2018 Population Health
2017
Population Health 2017 Population Health
2015/2016
Population Health 2016 Population Health
2014
Population Health 2014 Population Health
Related ReportsView All Reports
Emerging Technology
KLAS article icon
The Garage Bridge 2024
15 May 24    |   Benjamin Cassity and Jacob Mortensen
Healthcare organizations use many different data sources for care information and coordination, and data management is critical in order for organizations to deliver effectively on value-based care contracts. The Garage aims to help organizations on this front with Bridge, a value-based care platform. This report examines the Bridge customer experience.
First Look
KLAS article icon
COPE Health Solutions Analytics for Risk Contracting (ARC) 2024
10 April 24    |   Bradley Hunter and Jacob Mortensen
With the rapid rise in value-based care contracts and emphasis on patient population health, healthcare provider organizations are looking for insights into specific populations and metrics to manage outcomes and coordinate care. COPE Health Solutions seeks to meet this need by providing analytics and visualizations of population health data through the Analytics for Risk Contracting (ARC) solution. This report takes a first look at customer satisfaction and key functionality adoption among ARC customers.
Performance
KLAS article icon
Oracle Health (Cerner) Complete Look 2023
18 July 23    |   Paul Warburton and Tyson Blauer
When making a core HIT purchasing decision, healthcare organizations must take into account how prospective partners deliver across a variety of key technology areas. This Oracle Health (Cerner) “complete look” provides a high-level analysis of the key products that make up Oracle Health’s enterprise suite. (Other reports in the series do the same for Altera Digital Health [Allscripts] , Epic , Evident , and MEDITECH .)
Performance
KLAS article icon
Epic Complete Look 2023
18 July 23    |   Paul Warburton and Tyson Blauer
When making a core HIT purchasing decision, healthcare organizations must take into account how prospective partners deliver across a variety of key technology areas. This Epic “complete look” provides a high-level analysis of the key products that make up Epic’s enterprise suite. (Other reports in the series do the same for Altera Digital Health [Allscripts] , Evident , MEDITECH , and Oracle Health [Cerner] .)
Performance
KLAS article icon
Altera Digital Health (Allscripts) Complete Look 2023
18 July 23    |   Paul Warburton and Tyson Blauer
When making a core HIT purchasing decision, healthcare organizations must take into account how prospective partners deliver across a variety of key technology areas. This Altera Digital Health (Allscripts) Sunrise “complete look” provides a high-level analysis of the key products that make up Altera Digital Health’s enterprise suite. (Other reports in the series do the same for Epic , Evident , MEDITECH , and Oracle Health [Cerner] .) This report focuses on the core Sunrise suite and its supporting technology; data on Altera Digital Health’s standalone ambulatory platforms (TouchWorks and Professional) is excluded.
Performance
KLAS article icon
Population Health Vendor Overview 2023
15 June 23    |   Andy Paulsen and Bradley Hunter
As more healthcare organizations start to leverage population health management (PHM) technology in their journey toward offering value-based care, they are sometimes uncertain about how well vendors can fulfill their unique needs, as PHM programs vary in breadth and complexity. This report—a follow-up to KLAS’ 2021 report —provides an overview of several PHM offerings to help readers understand (1) what types of organizations typically use the solutions, (2) what the customer experience is like, (3) which solutions see the most market energy and why, (4) which vendors facilitate value-based contract revenue, and (5) how broadly PHM capabilities are adopted. Note: Although there are six PHM pillars, one pillar—patient engagement—is not covered in this report (view the KLAS website for more information on this pillar).
Point of Light
KLAS article icon
Points of Light 2023 Case Study 23
15 April 23    |   Aurene Wilford and Boyd Stewart
Poor interoperability between payers and providers negatively impacts many areas, including care quality, administrative workload, and documentation for regulatory requirements. With a shared goal of improving care for all patients, the collaborators in this case study worked together to automate the data exchange process and make it easier for providers to identify and close care gaps. This improved interoperability has increased preventive care, improved quality measure performance, and enabled providers to better address patient needs at the point of care.
Point of Light
KLAS article icon
Points of Light 2023 Case Study 11
14 April 23    |   Aurene Wilford and Boyd Stewart
Hoping to provide improved care management for individuals with high-risk chronic conditions, the collaborators in this case study launched a program aimed at providing deviceless remote patient monitoring for recently discharged individuals with hypertension, COPD, or congestive heart failure. If patient-entered data is outside the normal thresholds, virtual care navigators receive real-time alerts and can intervene to prevent the patient’s condition from deteriorating. Outcomes include reduced ED visits and readmissions as well as lower costs.

Konfidence

Konfidence level
Konfidence Level Description
Products must have at least 30 live organizations participating for software and at least 15 live organizations for professional services. Exception to this is Transcription Services (30).
Products must have at least 20 live organizations participating for software and at least 10 live organizations for professional services. Exception to this is Transcription Services (20).
Products must have at least 15 live organizations participating for software and at least 6 live organizations for professional services. Exception to this is Transcription Services
-
The Konfidence level on this product rating is low. These results are for early trend detection. As more performance data is received, the result is likely to have a wide variance.
We use cookies! We use essential and basic aggregated, depersonalized Google Analytics cookies to provide the type of content which our visitors are most interested in.  Cookie Policy    
​