Learning Tracks    Reports    Case Studies    Webinars    Members     Charts     My Files     Vendors


 Download Full Report

Similar Reports



 View Members


KLAS Arch Collaborative Physician Guidebook 2025
Jul 2025

KLAS Arch Collaborative Physician Guidebook 2025


A Path to Improving Physician EHR Satisfaction & Well-Being

Authored by:  Jenna Anderson, Lauren Manzione, Tommy Rowley, 07/21/2025 | Read Time: 5 minutes

The 2025 Arch Collaborative Physician Guidebook is based on the feedback of more than 35,000 physicians who have measured their EHR satisfaction via the KLAS Arch Collaborative from 2022 to April 2025. This data has enabled the Arch Collaborative to validate best practices used by healthcare organizations to make notable improvements to their physicians’ EHR satisfaction. This report compiles those best practices and data insights so leaders at any healthcare organization—regardless of their size, region, or EHR vendor—can improve the EHR experience for their physicians, ultimately leading to higher physician well-being and satisfaction.


Access the feedback of
500,000+ clinicians worldwide

Access the feedback of
500,000+ clinicians worldwide

 
 
or Login 


Close X
I am interested in joining the Arch Collaborative.

Here is my information:

Submit
Cancel
loading Sending Email...
After clicking "submit" above, a KLAS Representative will personally contact you within a day or two.

This guidebook will:

  1. Examine the relationship between the EHR experience and physician burnout, including common pain points that contribute to burnout and the potential for AI to ease those challenges
  2. Share best practices that enable increased physician EHR satisfaction through improvements to (1) EHR infrastructure, (2) education, (3) governance, and (4) personalization (the four components of the Arch Collaborative EHR House of Success)
  3. Highlight the correlation between these four components of EHR success and physician well-being, and include best practices that can lead to further improved physician well-being

Note: In 2023, KLAS published a guidebook focused on provider EHR satisfaction, followed by a guidebook specific to nurses in 2024. This guidebook focuses just on the physician experience.

Physician Burnout & Top Pain Points

the cost of ehr burnout physicians 2022 to 2025

While burnout levels have dropped since 2022, a third of physicians still report symptoms of burnout. Physicians who are satisfied with the EHR report lower rates of burnout and an intention to leave their organization. When organizations implement the best practices later in this guidebook, they can improve both physician wellness and EHR satisfaction.

reported burnout among physicians
net ehr experience score by burnout
net ehr experience score by likelihood to leave within two years

Top Physician Pain Points & the Possible Impact of AI to Ease Burden on Physicians

Commentary from surveyed physicians indicates several challenges. A few common issues are excessive documentation and slow chart closure, a sense of being overwhelmed by patient messaging, and difficulty accessing external patient data due to a lack of interoperability. Many healthcare leaders are seeking opportunities to leverage AI to solve their physicians’ pain points, ultimately hoping to reduce physician burnout and increase retention.

pain points and ai tools

Note: Click the links for KLAS reports on these topics; Ambient Speech Outcomes 2025, Message Burden 2025, and EHR Interoperability 2024.

The EHR House of Success Is a Critical Framework for Improving Physician Experience

While there are many barriers to physician EHR satisfaction, Arch Collaborative data consistently shows that focusing on the elements of the EHR House of Success improves EHR satisfaction. Instead of being hindered by the framework, physicians can use it as an effective tool to improve patient care.

ehr_house_of_success

Note: Click the link to jump to the following sections; EHR education, EHR governance, and EHR personalization.

EHR Infrastructure: The Foundation for Success Is a Fast & Reliable EHR Experience

top reasons for physician dissatisfaction with ehr infrastructurePoor EHR reliability and response time create significant barriers to physician EHR satisfaction, and these barriers must be addressed to create a foundation for physician EHR success. If they go unaddressed, efforts to improve training and governance will have muted effects. Specifically, EHR speed is the top-reported infrastructure concern, as slow speed can frustrate physicians daily. Reliability issues (e.g., unexpected downtime) don’t impact users as frequently, but ensuring reliability is still critical, as issues broadly impact users. 47% of interviewed physicians feel their EHR doesn’t have the expected response time, and 25% feel it isn’t reliable.

Best Practices for Improving EHR Infrastructure

feather iconEasier lifts

Speed

  • Comply with your EHR vendor’s infrastructure recommendations.

Reliability

  • Schedule regular downtime during the times of least impact; regularly communicate about scheduled downtime. Develop and implement downtime protocols to ensure patient safety and care continuity during both scheduled and unexpected events. Test upgrades offline to prevent live disruptions.

dumbbell iconHeavier lifts

Speed

  • Work with technical team and EHR vendor to set SLAs for EHR reliability, speed, and login processes across care settings; communicate these SLAs with senior leadership and end users.
  • Use a ticketing system and proactively round with physicians (alongside your technical team) to monitor EHR reliability, speed, and other issues across care settings.

Reliability

  • Forecast hardware-replacement costs by maintaining an inventory, setting a three- or five-year refresh cycle, and budgeting for annual equipment replacements.
  • When issues occur, conduct a root-cause analysis (examining ticket patterns and process-related factors; promptly inform clinicians of service impacts and restoration timelines.
  • Build in redundancy and automatic failovers.

To see more best practices and assess your organization’s maturity on EHR infrastructure, see this Success Pathway.

EHR Education: Establishing & Sustaining User Mastery & Efficiency

Onboarding EHR Education

Onboarding EHR education most commonly refers to the EHR training offered to newly hired clinicians during their first 90 days at an organization. Physicians who are satisfied with their initial training have a 176% higher agreement rate that the EHR is easy to learn compared to physicians who are not satisfied with their initial training.

physician challenges related to ehr training

Best Practices for Improving Onboarding EHR Education

feather iconEasier lifts

  • Determine the best delivery method, timing, and duration of training based on content and learner needs.
  • Identify tools to track individual journeys, including participation, gaps, and proficiency levels.
  • When communicating about training, emphasize the importance of EHR mastery for patient care/safety, documentation efficiency, and burnout reduction, and include a respected leader to reinforce its value. Clearly communicate how physicians can access tip sheets, videos, training materials, etc.
  • Ensure peer trainers are educated on needed physician workflows.
  • Ensure onboarding EHR content is vetted by physicians who are currently using the EHR in relevant specialties.
  • Use assessments and test-out options to tailor onboarding EHR education for physicians’ experience levels.
  • Survey new hires 2–3 weeks post-onboarding on the effectiveness, strengths, and gaps of the EHR education program; specifically ask what workflows they have encountered in patient care they felt unprepared for.
  • Actively iterate courses and content based on clinician survey results, help desk tickets, support requests, and EHR data.

dumbbell iconHeavier lifts

  • Build your onboarding EHR curriculum around optimal organizational, role, and specialty workflows; incorporate hands-on, patient-centered exercises to create meaningful, context-based learning.
  • Remove participation barriers by designing a clear, accessible path for clinicians to engage in onboarding EHR education courses in the correct sequence and within the appropriate time frame.
  • Establish a formal mentorship program for all departments between new hires and experienced physicians; set clear expectations to ensure mentors are effective teachers and strong EHR users.
  • Schedule regular check-in meetings with new hires at key intervals (e.g., 30, 60, and 90 days post-hire); use pre-meeting surveys to identify training needs and tailor the sessions to support individuals’ learning and EHR optimization.

To see more best practices and assess your organization’s maturity on onboarding EHR education, see this Success Pathway.

Ongoing EHR Education

Often overlooked, ongoing EHR education is an essential component of user mastery and efficiency. Physicians who are satisfied with ongoing training report a 124% higher agreement rate that the EHR enables efficiency. Unfortunately, 51% of physician respondents don’t agree that their ongoing training is sufficient. Physicians may have individual preferences for the type of training, but the quality, content, and scalability of the training are most important to their satisfaction and burnout levels.

Best Practices for Improving Ongoing EHR Education

feather iconEasier lifts

  • Leverage educational resources from your EHR vendor.
  • Ensure physicians know how to find support (e.g., online training resources, training staff).
  • Measure the effectiveness of your education program using a physician survey (such as KLAS’ Education Quality Benchmark).
  • Review help-desk tickets and support requests to identify training opportunities and/or curriculum gaps.
  • Use EHR efficiency data and end-user surveys as needed to identify and reach out to physicians who need additional training. Adjust content based on results.
  • Provide at least 1–2 hours of ongoing training for physicians.

dumbbell iconHeavier lifts

  • Build a curriculum that includes workflow- and specialty-specific content to ensure relevance and effectiveness.
  • Create a path for physicians to enroll in education courses in the correct order and time frame.
  • Through end-user surveys and EHR data, measure effectiveness, strengths, and gaps; communicate improvements (e.g., reduced after-hours documentation, faster charting, increased patient face time) with clinicians to promote ongoing participation.
  • Provide education when making EHR upgrades.
  • Use EHR liaisons as a resource to reinforce EHR best practices.
  • With EHR metrics and surveys in hand, round with clinicians to understand gaps and wins from ongoing education courses; be prepared to offer tips to clinicians.
  • Determine the best delivery method, timing, and duration of training based on content and learner needs. Determine if it should be incorporated with a wellness program. Provide continued medical education credit.
  • Identify tools to track individual journeys for EHR education, including participation, gaps, and proficiency levels.
  • Incentivize engagement through high-value options, such as off-site training, protected time for training, CME credits, and leadership development paths.

To see more best practices and assess your organization’s maturity on ongoing EHR education, see this Success Pathway.

EHR Governance: Governance Is a Tool to Show Physicians You Care

Effective EHR governance should go beyond approving changes—healthcare organizations should use governance as a strategic and operational framework to oversee EHR management, usage (including training), and optimization. Further, governance shows physicians you care and are listening to them and their needs. Unfortunately, many physicians feel they don’t have shared ownership over EHR governance, as only 45% of surveyed physicians agree that their organization implemented, trains on, and supports their EHR well.

EHR governance

The strategic and operational framework established within a healthcare organization to oversee system management, use, and optimization. Organizations’ governance strategies should involve four elements: (1) decision-making, (2) training/education oversight, (3) accountability, and (4) continuous improvement.

physician challenges related to ehr governance

quote icon“[I want the organization] to actually advocate for us. Whenever I bring something up, support will say they aren’t sure how to do it, and I don’t hear anything for several weeks. Finally, when a fix is implemented, it doesn’t work. In the end, it feels as though we never talked.”—Physician

Best Practices for Improving EHR Governance

feather iconEasier lifts

  • Create a diverse clinician group to work with the IT team on EHR-related decisions. Involve physicians who have frontline workflow expertise in all steps, including decision-making, implementation, and training. Make sure that individuals on governance committees are allotted time to participate.
  • Utilize many methods to communicate EHR changes; adapt messages based on the content, audience, and degree of change.
  • Send communication through a trusted source (e.g., leader, department head, educator, EHR liaison) as well as through the IT team; be consistent with the delivery method and format of communications.
  • Close the communication loop about requests and projects; communicate why changes are (or are not) occurring.

dumbbell iconHeavier lifts

  • Align decision-makers on strategic plans, including guiding principles, policies, and standardized processes that will guide consistent decisions across the organization.
  • IT teams must proactively communicate EHR changes to physicians.
  • Use rounding to interact frequently with physicians.
  • For obvious EHR needs, create a fast-track process for requests to bypass the review process.
  • Follow an established process for submitting, reviewing, delivering, and communicating about EHR requests.

To see more best practices and assess your organization’s maturity on EHR governance, see this Success Pathway.

EHR Personalization: Increasing Efficiency by Meeting Individual User Needs

Personalization allows healthcare organizations to meet the needs of individual end users without making significant changes to the EHR. Physicians want to make their EHR their own by aligning capabilities to meet their specific workflows.

net ehr experience score by agreement that ehr is personalized to support workflow

Best Practices for Improving EHR Personalization

feather iconEasier lifts

  • Audit physician workflows and introduce personalizations that will best meet their needs as soon as possible.
  • Assess available EHR vendor and third-party firms who can provide personalization courses/labs.
  • Embed personalization content into both initial and ongoing training, with regular follow-ups to optimize workflows.
  • Continuously monitor EHR usage data to identify EHR efficiency opportunities.
  • Streamline high-click workflows to reduce burden and improve user satisfaction.

dumbbell iconHeavier lifts

  • Encourage physicians to implement personalization tools they have successfully used before, following your EHR policies/governance.
  • Survey clinicians to assess perceived benefits and satisfaction with personalization tools. Determine which tools offer the greatest impact by specialty or focus area.
  • Calculate and share time and cost savings from reduced clicks to build buy-in and maintain engagement.

To see more best practices and insights on EHR personalization, see page 29 in the Expanded Insights section of the full report.

Actively Working to Improve the EHR Experience Will Improve Physician Well-Being

Physician well-being is critical for organizations to consider and actively work to improve. As mentioned previously, burnout among physicians is high, and many specifically cite their EHR as a burnout contributor. Thus, physician satisfaction with the EHR House of Success elements discussed above—EHR infrastructure, education, governance, and personalization—are strong indications of physicians’ burnout risk and overall well-being.

impact of physician ehr dissatisfaction on burnout risk

Beyond the best practices already discussed that are specific to the EHR House of Success, there are other ways to work to improve physician wellness, hopefully leading to less burnout and turnover.

Best Practices for Improving Physician Wellness

feather iconEasier lifts

  • Equip lower-level managers to explain reasons for decisions and how they align with the organization’s mission.
  • Maintain a positive organizational culture by acknowledging accomplishments and encouraging physician participation in EHR changes.
  • Embed wellness programs into education and informatics efforts.
  • Implement team events throughout the year both at and outside of work to build camaraderie.
  • Eliminate invasive or stigmatizing language in surveys/assessments and communication so that physicians feel empowered to seek mental health care when required.

dumbbell iconHeavier lifts

  • Create a safe, supportive environment that encourages dialogue about staff well-being.
  • Thoughtfully use AI automation; track outcomes to assess impact on physician burnout.
  • Give physicians control over aspects of their workload to allow more focus on patient care.
  • Ensure appropriate staffing levels to support physician flexibility and autonomy.
  • Appoint a chief wellness officer (CWO); allocate dedicated staff and budget to wellness efforts.
  • Offer comprehensive support resources (e.g., mental health, financial planning, and healthcare education services) to help physicians manage personal and professional challenges.
  • Regularly measure burnout symptoms to identify and address concerns.

For more insights, see the recent Arch Collaborative report on improving the clinician experience.


About This Report

KLAS surveys clinicians about their EHR experience and satisfaction using our Arch Collaborative EHR Experience Survey. This survey captures clinician feedback on various metrics, including 11 metrics (see the accompanying chart) that are aggregated into an overall Net EHR Experience Score (NEES). The NEES represents a snapshot of the clinician’s overall satisfaction with the EHR environment at their organization and can range from -100 (all negative feedback) to 100 (all positive feedback).

The data in this report was collected from 216 healthcare organizations between 2022 and 2025—historical data (prior to 2022) is not included except in the burnout timeline chart. If an organization has surveyed their clinicians multiple times, only the most recent full measurement is included. For this report, only data on physicians was used.

The previous guidebook had a provider focus, including both physician and advanced practice practitioner (APP) data. For this guidebook, only physician data is included, as Arch Collaborative data shows large gaps in scores between physicians and APPs, with physicians reporting lower gaps overall. This targeted view of physicians is aimed to help organizations address physician-specific challenges, though most best practices can also apply to APPs.

idividual metrics behind the nees

Additionally, the insights in this guidebook draw from Arch Collaborative member case studies, which highlight top-performing members of the Arch Collaborative that have worked with their EHR vendor or third-party vendor to improve different aspects of the EHR experience for physicians.

report respondents by primary work setting
report respondents by specialty

report respondents by organization type


Report Non-Public HTML Body

Report Public HTML Body


Upload Full Report



 Download Full Report

This material is copyrighted. Any organization gaining unauthorized access to this report will be liable to compensate KLAS for the full retail price. Please see the KLAS DATA USE POLICY for information regarding use of this report. © 2019 KLAS Research, LLC. All Rights Reserved. NOTE: Performance scores may change significantly when including newly interviewed provider organizations, especially when added to a smaller sample size like in emerging markets with a small number of live clients. The findings presented are not meant to be conclusive data for an entire client base.

}