KLAS Arch Collaborative Success Pathway—EHR Shared Ownership & Governance
KLAS Arch Collaborative Report KLAS Arch Collaborative Success Pathway—EHR Shared Ownership & Governance - EHR Governance
Access the feedback of
500,000+ clinicians worldwide
Access the feedback of
500,000+ clinicians worldwide
Here is my information:
Healthcare Delivery Organizations
Establish a Clinician-Led, IT-Supported EHR Shared Ownership & Governance Foundation to Drive Trust, Efficiency & EHR Success
Assess the current state: Review self-examination questions. Assess your clinicians’ awareness and feelings about your EHR shared ownership and governance structure using the KLAS Arch Collaborative EHR Experience Survey.
Establish a clinician-led, IT-supported EHR shared ownership and governance structure with foundation councils, committees, and work groups that include multidisciplinary members (e.g., physicians, nurses, APPs, clinical operations leaders, informaticists, educators, IT analysts, revenue/regulatory partners).
Ensure that your EHR shared ownership and governance charter and decision-making model align with organizational strategic goals, EHR guiding principles, clinical needs, and regulatory requirements.
To avoid an EHR silo, determine how EHR decision-making ties to overall organization decisions and established processes for evaluating requests and reporting decisions.
Create a governance model that follows a structured change management framework (e.g., Advancing Research and Clinical Practice Through Close Collaboration model, Johns-Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice model, Star model).
Incorporate the Arch Collaborative’s four governance pillars into your foundation: decision-making, accountability, training/education oversight, and continuous improvement. For additional information, see the Arch Collaborative Learning Summit 2023 overview.
Clearly define the responsibilities of your governance councils, committees, and work groups and define the scope of decision-making authority for each group. These responsibilities should include supporting patient care, optimizing EHR system usability and clinician efficiency, implementing necessary changes and upgrades (see the Success Pathway for EHR Changes & Upgrades), gathering user feedback, monitoring system performance, and reporting outcomes to senior leadership and frontline clinicians.
Determine the number and types of committees and work groups to include in your governance structure (e.g., physician, nurse, revenue cycle), including from a variety of clinical specialty and focus areas, ensuring balanced representation across locations and roles. View examples of EHR shared ownership and governance structures in the following Arch Collaborative case studies with Dubai Health, Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare, and St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital.
Establish consistent standards and processes for governance councils, committees, and work groups.
Institute a defined reporting structure for each governance group, including clear principles that outline who has decision-making authority and who holds final approval at every level.
Ensure there is representative overlap in governance group membership and participation to foster collaboration and coordination (e.g., a member of the nursing advisory council should also participate in the EHR shared ownership and governance steering committee, a physician member of a work group should also participate in the physician advisory council).
To prioritize enhancements and change requests, create transparent decision-making scoring criteria (e.g., patient safety, cost, time to create/implement the change, regulatory impact, clinician efficiency, reach). Create a tool and/or process to track requests and monitor progress and decisions.
Determine the frequency and length of committee and work group meetings (e.g., every third Wednesday at 8:00 a.m. for 90 minutes, once a month for 60 minutes).
Provide a structured agenda template for meetings that includes celebrations, follow-up items, new business, and communication plans. Confirm that each action item is assigned to an individual with a follow-up reporting date.
Select and monitor KPIs to ensure EHR governance groups are effectively serving their purpose.
Select governance council and committee members intentionally using criteria such as clinical credibility, communication skills, service-line representation, and willingness to collaborate.
Include frontline workflow experts and stakeholders who can assess the organization-wide impact of EHR changes and optimizations.
Create a career development/laddering framework for participants. (See an example of EHR shared ownership and governance career laddering in the Arch Collaborative case study written in partnership with Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.)
Establish a clear role for each participant (e.g., voting member, advisor, subject matter expert) to ensure efficient EHR use across users and proper management of EHR workflows.
Clarify term lengths and rotation schedules to maintain strong engagement across a wide user base. Monitor participation and replace inactive members.
Provide protected time for participants to engage in your EHR shared ownership and governance process.
Build a Standardized Pathway with Closed-Loop Feedback for Clinicians to Submit & Track Optimization Requests
Establish a single pathway to formally enter the governance process and educate users on the governance submission process.
Ensure the process supports requesters in creating a well-developed proposal.
Create a standardized submission form that incorporates the Phase 1 scoring criteria, outlines the requested change and its rationale, captures expected downstream impacts and/or efficiency gains, and ties to the organization’s strategic goals.
Provide an opportunity for requesters to present their idea(s) to the appropriate governance group. Identify a change sponsor to help shepherd the requester through the governance process.
Publish a simplified flow diagram for requests that can also be leveraged to show each submission’s status.
Institute response-time expectations and close-the-loop standards for all submissions (i.e., each submission receives a follow-up with next steps in 30 days). Ensure each submission is easily trackable by committee members and requesters.
Include information about whether the request is approved and will move forward and why. As applicable, set expectations around the implementation timeline.
For requests that are not approved, close the loop with the requester by explaining the rationale.
Create a Robust EHR Shared Ownership & Governance Communication Plan
Develop a robust communication plan for EHR governance decisions and changes. Identify communication owners (e.g., CMIO/CMO will communicate physician-focused messages, CNIO/CNO will communicate nursing-focused messages, service line leaders will communicate role-specific changes).
Set a consistent day and time for routine communications (e.g., every Thursday morning, every other Tuesday at noon), especially for topics like upgrades.
Create a standard communication format that translates EHR shared ownership and governance decisions into clear “what, why, and when” messages for clinicians.
Highlight clinician-proposed changes and enhancements. Include a standard “you asked, we acted” section in all EHR shared ownership and governance-related communications.
Leverage multiple communication channels (e.g., emails, townhall meetings, superuser cascades, rounding, team meetings, posters, intranet sites, EHR pop-ups) to reach diverse audiences.
Use a variety of communication formats, incorporating videos and written formats.
Tailor messages by specialty, role, and workflow impact.
Establish In-Person Support & Rounding to Continually Capture Clinician Feedback & Strengthen Relationships
Build relationships between EHR shared ownership and governance committee members and frontline clinicians through a regular rounding cadence.
Prepare team members to share tips, workflow refinements, and upcoming changes as well as to listen for pain points to gather new submissions. Equip team members with the knowledge to close the loop on concerns and questions.
Require governance leaders to regularly round in clinical settings and listen to concerns.
Display committee rosters, term lengths, and meeting schedules in an easily accessible place (i.e., your intranet) so that clinicians know who represents them in EHR shared ownership and governance decisions.
Credit clinicians when their changes or optimizations are implemented to illustrate your clinician-led EHR shared ownership and governance framework. Include relevant details (e.g., the requester’s name, role, and specialty) on tip sheets and related education materials.
Incorporate clinician quotes, survey themes, and EHR usage data into EHR shared ownership and governance agenda packets.
Self-Examination Questions—EHR Shared Ownership & Governance
On a scale of 1–5, rate your agreement with the following statements (5 means “strongly agree” and 1 means “strongly disagree”):
- Our organization has created a strategic and operational EHR shared ownership and governance framework to oversee EHR management, EHR usage and training, and EHR changes and optimizations.
- We use the Arch Collaborative to routinely measure clinician satisfaction, demonstrate that their input is heard, and identify key pain points.
- Our organization’s EHR shared ownership and governance structure is clinician led and IT supported.
- Our organization promotes strong working relationships with clinical and operational leaders to successfully guide organization goals through our EHR shared ownership and governance structure.
- Our EHR shared ownership and governance structure creates consistent opportunities for clinical, organizational, and IT leaders to engage directly with frontline EHR users (e.g., rounding, regular informatics office hours).
- Our organization demonstrates a ROI for our EHR shared ownership and governance structure by tracking and showing trends in clinician burnout and turnover, patient care, request volume, turnaround times, issue resolution, education engagement, and upgrade quality.
- Clinicians from multiple roles and backgrounds are intentionally selected for EHR shared ownership and governance roles using transparent selection criteria.
- EHR shared ownership and governance committee members are compensated and/or recognized appropriately for their involvement in our governance structure.
- Our organization provides clear communication and training to EHR shared ownership and governance participants on the expectations and time commitment for the role.
- Our organization’s EHR shared ownership and governance charters include a process for replacing participants who leave before the conclusion of their term or who don’t meet defined expectations.
- Our EHR shared ownership and governance committees consistently follow established processes.
- Our organization uses a consistent scoring system to prioritize change and enhancement requests.
- Clinicians understand how to request fixes and optimizations and can see the status of their requests.
- Rationale for approvals, denials, and deferrals are regularly communicated back to requestors.
- If a fix or optimization request is denied or deferred, our organization works to find a related training tip for the requestor.
- Our organization’s EHR shared ownership and governance framework includes a fast track for break fixes.
- Our organization’s EHR shared ownership and governance communications are distributed at a consistent day and time.
- Our organization routinely shares examples of “you asked, we acted” changes and enhancements.
- Our organization’s communications are tailored by clinical role and specialty/focus area.
- Clinicians know who their assigned informatics/IT support contacts are.
- Our organization uses multiple communication channels and formats to reach clinicians.
- Clinicians consistently receive closure on issues raised during rounding.
- Our organization provides resources and training to help users understand EHR system capabilities, optimize workflows, and adhere to policies and procedures.
- When our organization rolls out EHR changes and optimizations, we have established processes to ensure the appropriate education is in place for all impacted clinicians.
Total
Scoring
| Total score | Maturity level | Next steps |
|---|---|---|
| 98+ | Mature | Your EHR shared ownership and governance process likely needs only fine-tuning. Your current efforts are extensive and align with Arch Collaborative best practices. |
| 75–97 | Established | Your answers indicate that your EHR shared ownership and governance foundation has some areas to shore up. To improve clinicians’ EHR experience, focus on strengthening communication gaps, committee structures, rounding, and upgrade governance. Ensure your EHR shared ownership and governance align with your organization’s strategic objectives, available resources, and clinician needs. |
| <75 | Nascent | Continue to work on your process-improvement plan to create value for clinicians as you work to improve their EHR experience. |
HIT Software Vendors
Self-Examination Questions—EHR Shared Ownership & Governance
- We provide clear guidance on how our customers should structure multidisciplinary governance.
- We publish consistent and predictable timelines for EHR changes, upgrades, and patches.
- We provide incentives or tools to help organizations adopt our most current release.
- We collaborate with our customers’ EHR shared ownership and governance committees to evaluate enhancement feasibility.
- We guide customers on when to follow standards and when to make targeted changes or optimizations that will add value without increasing clinician frustration, particularly during EHR upgrades.
- We offer tools/templates to our customers for scoring enhancement requests and prioritizing changes.
- We help our customers understand the intent and impact of upcoming system EHR changes.
- We offer EHR analytics that help EHR shared ownership and governance teams understand usage patterns and workflow problems.
- We provide specialty-specific workflows, communication templates, and training materials for EHR upgrades.
- Our release notes are organized to support clinician-specific communications.
- We have made a sandbox or test environment accessible for customers to test EHR changes and upgrades early.
- We have clear, established channels through which our customers can submit change requests.
- We follow established processes for evaluating and prioritizing customers’ change requests.
- We provide transparency into the status of customers’ change requests.
- We close the loop on customers’ change requests and communicate whether those requests are accepted.
- We provide transparency to our customers around the why of changes that are made.
Report Non-Public HTML Body
Report Public HTML Body
This material is copyrighted. Any organization gaining unauthorized access to this report will be liable to compensate KLAS for the full retail price. Please see the KLAS DATA USE POLICY for information regarding use of this report. © 2019 KLAS Research, LLC. All Rights Reserved. NOTE: Performance scores may change significantly when including newly interviewed provider organizations, especially when added to a smaller sample size like in emerging markets with a small number of live clients. The findings presented are not meant to be conclusive data for an entire client base.